skip to main content
10.1145/2212776.2212422acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Reject me: peer review and SIGCHI

Published: 05 May 2012 Publication History

Abstract

The HCI research community grows bigger each year, refining and expanding its boundaries in new ways. The ability to effectively review submissions is critical to the growth of CHI and related conferences. The review process is designed to produce a consistent supply of fair, high-quality reviews without overloading individual reviewers; yet, after each cycle, concerns are raised about limitations of the process. Every year, participants are left wondering why their papers were not accepted (or why they were). This SIG will explore reviewing through a critical and constructive lens, discussing current successes and future opportunities in the CHI review process. Goals will include actionable conclusions about ways to improve the system, potential alternative peer models, and the creation of materials to educate newcomer reviewers.

References

[1]
Bartneck, C. and Hu, J. Scientometric analysis of the CHI proceedings. Proc. CHI '09, 3, 1 (2009), 699.
[2]
Bernstein, M. S., Ackerman, M. S., Chi, E. H., and Miller, R. C. The Trouble With Social Computing Systems Research. CHI '11, ACM (2011), 389--398.
[3]
Grudin, J. Why CHI fragmented. CHI 05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems CHI 05, (2005), 1083.
[4]
Grudin, J. Is HCI homeless? interactions 13, 1 (2006), 54.
[5]
Karger, D. CHI: Do we really need three reviewers for every paper? Haystack Blog, 2010. http://groups.csail.mit.edu/haystack/blog/2010/04/13/chi-do-we-really-need-three-reviewers-for-everypaper/.
[6]
Kaye, J. J. Some statistical analyses of CHI. CHI EA '09, (2009).
[7]
Kriplean, T., Morgan, J., Freelon, D., Borning, A., and Bennett, L. Supporting Reflective Public Thought with ConsiderIt. CSCW '12, (2012).
[8]
Landay, J. I give up on CHI/UIST. Dub for the future, 2009. http://dubfuture.blogspot.com/2009/11/i-give-up-onchiuist.html.
[9]
Myers, B. A. A brief history of human-computer interaction technology. interactions 5, 2 (1998), 44--54.
[10]
Oulasvirta, A. 1,214 CHI submissions were rejected this year. Why? Human-Computer Interactions blog, 2011. http://oulasvirta.posterous.com/86113982.
[11]
Sommerville, I. Original ideas don't get published in top conferences. Thoughts on software and systems engineering blog, 2011. http://se9book.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/originalideas-dont-get-published-in-top-conferences/.
[12]
Wilson, M. L., Mackay, W., Russell, D., Chi, E., Bernstein, M., and Thimbleby, H. RepliCHI. CHI '11 Panel, (2011).

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Shadow Program Committee: Designing for Diversity and Equity within Academic CommunitiesACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/36307432:1(1-24)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2023
  • (2021)HCI Research in the Middle East and North Africa: A Bibliometric and Socioeconomic OverviewInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2021.200470138:16(1546-1562)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2021
  • (2020)Uncovering CHI Reviewers Needs and BarriersProceedings of the 2020 Symposium on Emerging Research from Asia and on Asian Contexts and Cultures10.1145/3391203.3391218(57-60)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020

Index Terms

  1. Reject me: peer review and SIGCHI

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '12: CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2012
    2864 pages
    ISBN:9781450310161
    DOI:10.1145/2212776

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 May 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. design
    2. methods
    3. reflexivity
    4. reviewing
    5. systems

    Qualifiers

    • Extended-abstract

    Conference

    CHI '12
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Shadow Program Committee: Designing for Diversity and Equity within Academic CommunitiesACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/36307432:1(1-24)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2023
    • (2021)HCI Research in the Middle East and North Africa: A Bibliometric and Socioeconomic OverviewInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2021.200470138:16(1546-1562)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2021
    • (2020)Uncovering CHI Reviewers Needs and BarriersProceedings of the 2020 Symposium on Emerging Research from Asia and on Asian Contexts and Cultures10.1145/3391203.3391218(57-60)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media