skip to main content
10.1145/2212776.2223838acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Sharing emotion on Facebook: network size, density, and individual motivation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social networking sites afford substantial affective self-expression and hybrid social connections. In this study, we collected 185 Facebook users' egocentric social network data and analyzed the words of positive emotion and negative emotion in their past status updates. Preliminary results reveal that sharing emotion on Facebook is associated with their social network size and density, and this association is moderated by the individual motivation for relationship management. We also found a decreasing trend of emotion sharing with longer usage of Facebook. Follow-up studies and implications are discussed.

References

  1. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. and Freeman, L.C. Ucinet 6 for windows, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd, D. Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In A networked self: Indentiy, community, and culture on social netowrk sites, Z. Papacharissi. Routledge, New York, NY, 2011, 39--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. The benefit of facebook "friends": Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 4 (2007), 1143--1168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Facebook Data Team. What's on your mind. http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=4775173 58858.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Golder, S.A. and Macy, M.W. Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylenth across diverse cultures. Science,333, 6051 (2011),1878--1881.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gross, J.J., Richards, J.M. and John, O.P. Emotion regulation in everyday life. Emotion regulation in couples and families: Pathways to dysfunction and health, (2006), 13--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayes, A.F. and Matthes, J. Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, (2009), 924--936.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hogan, B. Name Gen Web, 2010. http://apps.facebook.com/namegenweb/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kivran-Swaine, F. and Naaman, M. Network properties and social sharing of emotions in social awareness streams. In Proc. CSCW 2011, ACM Press (2011), 379--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lee, D.-H., Im, S. and Taylor, C.R. Voluntary selfdisclosure of information on the internet: A multimethod study of the motivations and consequences of disclosing information on blogs. Psychology and Marketing, 25, 7 (2008), 692--710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Naaman, M., Boase, J. and Lai, C.-H., Is it really about me? message content in social awareness streams. In Proc. CSCW 2010, ACM Press (2010),189192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Pennebaker, J.W., Booth, R. and Francis, M. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC. LIWC.net, Austin, TX, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rimé, B., Paez, D., Kanyangara, P. and Yzerbyt, V. The social sharing of emotions in interpersonal and in collective situations: Common psychosocial consequences. In Emotion regulation and well-being, I. Nyklí ek, A. Vingerhoets and Zeelenberg, M., Springer, 2011, 147--163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Sharing emotion on Facebook: network size, density, and individual motivation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader