Jaap Hage
- Alexy, R. (1978). Theorie derjuristischen Argumentation. Suhrkamp Verlag, Framkfurt am Main.Google Scholar
- Anscombe, G.E.M. (1958). On Brute Facts,,4nalysis, vol. 18, p. 69-72.Google Scholar
- Brewka, G. (1994). Reasoning about preference in dcthult logic. Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Davidson, D. (i 967). Truth and Meaning. in D. Davidson, Ttwth and Interpretation, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1984.Google Scholar
- Dworkin, R. (1978). Taking Rights Seriously, 2nd ed., Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
- Foot, Ph. R. (1958). Moral Arguments. in Ph. R. Foot, Virtues and Vices and other Essays in ~loral Philosophy, Basil BlackwelI, Oxford 1978, p. 96-109.Google Scholar
- Fuller, L.L. (1969). Tile Morality of Law, 2nd ed., Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
- Geffner, H. and J. Pearl (1992). Conditional entaihnent: bridging two approaches to default reasoning, .4rt(ficial Intelligence 53, p.209-244. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gordon, Th. F. (1994): The Pleadings Game: An Exercise in Coinputational Dialectics, ,4rt(ficial hltelligence and Law 2, pp. 239-292. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hage, J.C. (1993). Monological Reason Based Logic. Proceedings of the fourth International Conference on Law and Artificial httelligence, ACM-press, Amsterdam, p. 30-39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hage, J.C. (1994). Two Metaphors of Reasoning. H. Prakken, A.J. Muntjewerff, A. Soeteman and R.G.F. Winkels (cds.), Legal knowledge based systems; the relatioti with legal theory, Koninklijke Vermande, Lelystad, pp. 12% 138.Google Scholar
- Hage, J.C. (forthcoming). The two layers of the law (in Dutch).Google Scholar
- Hage, J.C., R, Leenes, and A. Lodder (1994). {lard cases; a procedural approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law, vol. 2, pp. 113-167. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hage, J.C. and H.B. Verheij (1994). Towards a logic lbr reasoning with norms. J. Breuker (ed.)Proceedings of the E011- 94 Workshop on Arttficial NoJwtative Reasoning, pp. 160-177.Google Scholar
- Hage, J.C. and H.B. Verheij (to appear). Reason-Based Logic: a logic for reasoning with mles and reasons. Paper accepted for Law, Computers attd Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
- Hare, R.M. (1952). The Language of Morals. Oxtbrd University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Hart, H.L.A. (1958). Positivism and the Separation of I~aw and Morals, in H.L.A. Hart, Essays in Jutisprttdeltce and })hilosopio,, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1983, p.49-87.Google Scholar
- Hempel, C.G. (1950). The Empiricist Criterion of Meaning. In A.J. Ayer, Logical Positivism, '{}~e Free Press, New York 1959.Google Scholar
- Koers, A.W. and D. Kracht ( 1991 ). A Goal Driven Kamwledge Based System For A Domain Of Private International Law, Proceedings of the Third bzternational Conference on .4rtificial Intelligence and Law, ACM Press, p. 81-85. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lorenz, K. (1977). Behind the Mirror: ,4 Search for a Nattlral History of Human Knowledge. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
- Lukaszewicz, W. (1990). Non-monotonic Reasoning; fo~talization of commonsense reasoning. Ellis Horwood, London e.a.Google Scholar
- MacConnick, D.N. (1974). Law as institutional fact, The Law Quarterly Review 90, p. 102-129.Google Scholar
- MacConnick, D.N. (1978). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- MacConnick, D.N. and O. Weinberger (1987), An Institutional Theory of Law, Reidel, Dordrecht etc.Google Scholar
- McCarty, L.T. (1980). The Taxman Project: Towards a Cognitive Theory of Legal Argument. B. Niblett (ed.), Computer Science and Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Naess, A. (1966). Communication and Argument. Elements of Applied Semantics. Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
- Pollock, J.L. (1987). Defeasible Reasoning. Cognitive Science 11, p. 481-518.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Prakken, H. (1993). Logical tools for modelling legal argument, Ph.-D.-thesis gansterdam.Google Scholar
- Prakken, H. (I 995). A semantic view on reasoning about priorities. Proceedings of the Second Dutch-German workshop on Non-monotonic Reasoning, Utrecht, pp. 160-167.Google Scholar
- Putnam, H. (1976). Realism and Reason. H. Putnam, Meaning and the g toral Sciences. Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston e.a. 1978, p. 123-138.Google Scholar
- Raz, J. (1975). Practical Reason and Norms, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
- Ross, A. (1968). Directives and Norms, London.Google Scholar
- Sanders, K.E. ( 1991 ). Representing and reasoning about opentextured predicates. Proceedings of the third International Cotference on Law and,qrtificial Intelligence, ACM-press, Oxlbrd, p. 137-144. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sartor, G. (1994). A Fonnal Model of Legal Argumentation. Ratio duris, vol. 7, pp. 177-211.Google Scholar
- Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech acts; An essay in the philosophy of language, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Searle, J. (1975). A taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts, in J. Searle, Expression and ibieaning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge e.a., p. 1-29.Google Scholar
- Summers, R.S. (1978). Two types of substantive reasons: The core of a theory of coimnon-law justification. Cot'nell Law Review 63 m'. 5, pp. 707-735.Google Scholar
- Touhnin, S.E. (1958). The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, London, New York.Google Scholar
- Verheij, HB, (1995). Accrual of arguments in defeasible argumentation. Accepted paper for the second Dutch/German Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning.Google Scholar
- Valente, A. and J. Breukcr, Ontologies: the Missing Link Between Legal Theory and AI & Law. H. Prakken. A.J. MuntjewerlT, A. Soeteman, and R.G.F. Winkels (eds.), Legal kl~owledge based systems; The Relation with Legal Theory, Koninklijke Vennande BV, Lelystad 1994, p. 139-149.Google Scholar
- Verheij, H.B. and J.C. Hage (1994). Reasoning by analogy; a tbnnal reconstruction. H. Prakken, A.J. Muntjewerff, A. Soeteman and R.F. Wizukels (eds.), Legal knowledge based systems; the relation with legal theory, Koninklijke Vermande, Lelystad, pp. 65-78.Google Scholar
- White, A.R. (1975). Modal Thinking. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Teleological reasoning in reason-based logic
Recommendations
Monological reason-based logic: a low level integration of rule-based reasoning and case-based reasoning
ICAIL '93: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and lawThis paper contains an informal introduction to a theory about legal reasoning (reason-based logic) that takes the notion of a reason to be central. Arguing for a conclusion comes down to first collecting the reasons that plead for and against the ...
Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning
ICAIL '09: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and LawIn 1993, Berman and Hafner criticized case-based models of legal reasoning for not modeling analogical and teleological elements. Another lesson learned since then is the role of ontologies in representing domain knowledge so that a legal reasoning ...
Reasoning about priorities in default logic
AAAI'94: Proceedings of the Twelfth AAAI National Conference on Artificial IntelligenceIn this paper we argue that for realistic applications involving default reasoning it is necessary to reason about the priorities of defaults. Existing approaches require the knowledge engineer to explicitly state all relevant priorities which are then ...
Comments