skip to main content
10.1145/223904.223923acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Multidisciplinary modelling in HCI design…in theory and in practice

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 May 1995Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.Barnard, P.J. and Harrison, M.D. Towards a Framework for Modelling Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of EWHCI'92: East-West Conference in HCI, 1992, pp. 189-196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Bellotti, V. Implications of Current Design Practice for the Use of HCI Techniques. In Proceedings of HCI'88: People and Computers V, 1988, CUP: Cambridge, pp. 13-34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Bellotti, V. A Framework for Assessing Applicability of HCI Techniques. In Proceedings of IFIP INTERACT'90: Human-Computer Interaction, 1990, Elsevier: Amsterdam, pp. 213-218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Bellotti, V. Integrating Theoreticians' and Practitioners' Perspectives with Design Rationale. In Proceedings of InterCHI'93: Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1993, ACM Press: NY, pp. 101-106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Bellotti, V., Buckingham Shum, S. and MacLean, A. Assaying Multidisciplinary Modelling Using QOC as a Mediating Design Expression: The 'EuroCODE' Design Exemplar. Amodeus-2 Project, Working Paper ID/WP30, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Bernsen, N.O. Structuring Design Spaces. In Adjunct Proceedings of InterCHI'93 (Short Papers), 1993, pp. 211-212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Blandford, A. and Young, R.M. Developing Runnable User Models: Separating the Problem Solving Techniques from the Domain Knowledge. In HCI'93: People and Computers VIII, 1993, CUPGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Blandford, A.E. and Young, R.M. A tutorial introduction to the PUM Instruction Language. Amodeus-2 Project, Working Paper UM/WP29, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Buckingham Shum, S. Analyzing the Usability of a Design Rationale Notation. To appear in: Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use, Moran, T.P. and Carroll, J.M., (Ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, (in press). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Buckingham Shum, S. (Ed.) Preliminary Modelling of the CERD Flight Sequencing Tool. Amodeus-2 Project, Working Paper TA/WP23, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Buckingham Shum, S. and Hammond, N. Argumentation-Based Design Rationale: What Use at What Cost? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 4, 1994, pp. 603-652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Buckingham Shum, S. and Hammond, N. Delivering HCI Modelling to Designers: A Framework and Case Study of Cognitive Modelling. Interacting with Computers, 6, 3, 1994, pp. 311-341.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Buckingham Shum, S. and Hammond, N. Transferring HCI Modelling and Design Techniques to Practitioners: A Framework and Empirical Work. In Proceedings of HCI'94: People and Computers IX, 1994, CUP, pp. 21-36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Buckingham Shum, S., J~rgensen, A., Hammond, N. and Aboulafia, A. (Eds.) Amodeus HCI Modelling & Design Approaches: Executive Summaries & Worked Examples. Amodeus-2 Project, Working Paper TA/WP16, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Buckingham Shum, S., J~rgensen, A.H., Aboulafia, A. and Hammond, N.V. Communicating HCI Modelling to Practitioners. In Proceedings of ACM CHI'94: Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1994, ACM: New York, pp. 271-272 (Vol.2). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Carroll, J.M. and Rosson, M.B. Deliberated Evolution: Stalking The View Matcher in Design Space. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 3&4, 1991, pp. 281-318.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Coutaz, J. PAC: An Object-Oriented Model for Dialog Design. In Proceedings of IFIP INTERACT'87, 1987, Elsevier: Amsterdam, pp. 431-436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Curtis, B., Krasner, H. and Iscoe, N. A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems. Communications of the ACM, 31, 11, 1988, pp. 1268-1286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Duke, D. and Harrison, M. Abstract Interaction Objects. Computer Graphics Forum, 12, 1993, pp. 25-36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. 20.Gaver, W., T., M., MacLean, A., L~vstrand, L., Dourish, P., Carter, K. and Buxton, W. Realising a Video Environment: EuroPARC's RAVE System. In Proceedings of ACM CHI'92: Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press: New York: Monterey, CA, 1992, pp. 27-35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.Gray, W.D., John, B.E. and Atwood, M.E. The Precis of Project Ernestine or an overview of a validation of GOMS. In Proceedings of ACM CHI'92: Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1992, ACM Press: New York, pp. 307-312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.Gugerty, L. The Use of Analytical Models in Human-Computer Interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 1993, pp. 625-660. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.acLean, A., Buckingham Shum, S. and Bellotti, V. Design Rationale Tutorial. Tutorials at HCI'92-94: British Computer Society HCI Conferences, UK, 1992-94Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.MacLean, A., Young, R.M., Bellotti, V. and Moran, T. Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 3 & 4, 1991, pp. 201-250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. 25.Mantei, M.M., Baecker, R.M., Sellen, A.J., Buxton, W.A.S., Milligan, T. and Wellman, B. Experiences in the Use of a Media Space. In Proceedings of ACM CHI'91: Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1991, pp. 203-208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.May, J., Barnard, P.J. and Blandford, A. Using Structural Descriptions of Interfaces to Automate the Modelling of User Cognition. User Modelling and Adaptive User Interfaces, 3, 1993, pp. 27-64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. 27.McKerlie, D. and MacLean, A. QOC in Action: Using Design Rationale to Support Design. Video Program, InterCHI'93: Human Factors in Computing Systems. Amsterdam, Netherlands. ACM SIGGRAPH Video Review Series, 1993 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.McKerlie, D. and MacLean, A. Reasoning with Design Rationale: Practical Experience with Design Space Analysis. Design Studies, 15, 2, 1994, pp. 214-226Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.Monk, A., Carroll, J., Harrison, M., Long, J. and Young, R. New Approaches to Theory in HCI: How Should We Judge Their Acceptability? In Proceedings of IFIP INTERACT'90: Human-Computer Interaction, 1990, Elsevier: Amsterdam, pp. 1055-1058. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. 30.Payne, S.J. Understanding Calendar Use. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 2, 1993, pp. 83-100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. 31.Rosson, M., Maass, S. and Kellogg, W. The Designer as User: Building Requirements for Design Tools from Design Practice. Communications of the ACM, 31, 11, 1988, pp. 1288-1298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multidisciplinary modelling in HCI design…in theory and in practice

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format