skip to main content
research-article

Automatic evaluation of video summaries

Published:06 August 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This article describes a method for the automatic evaluation of video summaries based on the training of individual predictors for different quality measures from the TRECVid 2008 BBC Rushes Summarization Task. The obtained results demonstrate that, with a large set of evaluation data, it is possible to train fully automatic evaluation systems based on visual features automatically extracted from the summaries. The proposed approach will enable faster and easier estimation of the results of newly developed abstraction algorithms and the study of which summary characteristics influence their perceived quality.

References

  1. Bai, L., Lao, S., Smeaton, A. F., and O'Connor, N. E. 2008. Automatic summarization of rushes video using bipartite graphs. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Semantic and Digital Media Technologies (SAMT '08). Springer-Verlag, 3--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bailer, W. and Thallinger, G. 2008. Comparison of content selection methods for skimming rushes video. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM TRECVid Video Summarization Workshop (TVS '08). ACM, 85--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bredin, H., Byrne, D., Lee, H., O'Connor, N. E., and Jones, G. J. 2008. Dublin city university at the trecvid 2008 BBC rushes summarisation task. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM TRECVid Video Summarization Workshop (TVS '08). ACM, 45--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Stone, C. J., and Olshen, R. A. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Christel, M. G., Hauptmann, A. G., Lin, W.-H., Chen, M.-Y., Yang, J., Maher, B., and Baron, R. V. 2008. Exploring the utility of fast-forward surrogates for BBC rushes. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM TRECVid Video Summarization Workshop (TVS '08). ACM, 35--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Christel, M. G., Smith, M. A., Taylor, C. R., and Winkler, D. B. 1998. Evolving video skims into useful multimedia abstractions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '98). ACM, 171--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ding, W., Marchionini, G., and Tse, T. 1997. Previewing video data: Browsing key frames at high rates using a video slide show. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Research, Development and Practice in Digital Libraries (ISDL '97). 151--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dumont, E. and Merialdo, B. 2007. Split-screen dynamically accelerated video summaries. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on TRECVID Video Summarization (TVS '07). ACM, 55--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dumont, E. and Merialdo, B. 2008a. Automatic evaluation method for rushes summarization: experimentation and analysis. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI '08). 518--525.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dumont, E. and Merialdo, B. 2008b. Sequence alignment for redundancy removal in video rushes summarization. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM TRECVid Video Summarization Workshop (TVS '08). ACM, 55--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dumont, E. and Merialdo, B. 2010. Rushes video summarization and evaluation. Multimed. Tools Appl. 48, 1, 51--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ekin, A., Tekalp, A., and Mehrotra, R. 2003. Automatic soccer video analysis and summarization. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 12, 7, 796--807. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ferman, A. and Tekalp, A. 2003. Two-stage hierarchical video summary extraction to match low-level user browsing preferences. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 5, 2, 244--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hauptmann, A. G., Christel, M. G., Lin, W.-H., Maher, B., Yang, J., Baron, R. V., and Xiang, G. 2007. Clever clustering vs. simple speed-up for summarizing rushes. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on TRECVID Video Summarization (TVS '07). ACM, 20--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kasutani, E. and Yamada, A. 2001. The MPEG-7 color layout descriptor: a compact image feature description for high-speed image/video segment retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '01). 674--677.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Over, P., Smeaton, A. F., and Awad, G. 2008. The trecvid 2008 BBC rushes summarization evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM TRECVid Video Summarization Workshop (TVS '08). ACM, 1--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Over, P., Smeaton, A. F., and Kelly, P. 2007. The trecvid 2007 bbc rushes summarization evaluation pilot. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on TRECVID Video Summarization (TVS '07). ACM, 1--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ren, T., Liu, Y., and Wu, G. 2008. Full-reference quality assessment for video summary. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 874--883. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Taskiran, C., Pizlo, Z., Amir, A., Ponceleon, D., and Delp, E. 2006. Automated video program summarization using speech transcripts. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 8, 4, 775--791. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Valdes, V. and Martinez, J. M. 2008. Binary tree based on-line video summarization. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM TRECVid Video Summarization Workshop (TVS '08). ACM, 134--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yamasaki, K., Shinoda, K., and Furui, S. 2008. Automatically estimating number of scenes for rushes summarization. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM TRECVid Video Summarization Workshop (TVS '08). ACM, 129--133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Automatic evaluation of video summaries

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
        ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 8, Issue 3
        July 2012
        143 pages
        ISSN:1551-6857
        EISSN:1551-6865
        DOI:10.1145/2240136
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 August 2012
        • Accepted: 1 April 2011
        • Revised: 1 August 2010
        • Received: 1 April 2010
        Published in tomm Volume 8, Issue 3

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader