skip to main content
10.1145/2245276.2232047acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Knowledge compilation for automated Team Composition exploiting standard SQL

Published:26 March 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Automatically finding suitable candidates in an organization to compose a team able to solve a given task is a typical problem in large companies. In this paper we present a Description Logics approach to Team Composition based on candidates technical knowledge and on tasks descriptions, modeled according to a skills ontology in ALE(D). The novelty of our approach is that our implemented service exploits standard-SQL querying expressiveness to emulate the proper reasoning procedures. The Team Composition service has been deployed as part of I.M.P.A.K.T., a skill management system, and results show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

References

  1. F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. Mc Guinness, D. Nardi, and P. Patel-Schneider, editors. The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. F. Baader, R. Küsters, and R. Molitor. Computing least common subsumers in description logics with existential restrictions. In IJCAI'99, pages 96--101, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. F. Baader and A.-Y. Turhan. On the problem of computing small representations of least common subsumers. In KI '02, volume 2479 of LNAI, pages 99--113, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Biesalski and A. Abecker. Similarity measures for skill-profile matching in enterprise knowledge management. In ICEIS 2006, pages 11--16, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Cadoli and F. M. Donini. A survey on knowledge compilation. AI Commun., 10(3--4): 137--150, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Chomicki. Querying with Intrinsic Preferences. In EDBT 2002, pages 34--51. Springer-Verlag, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. I. Chong, S. Das, G. Eadon, and J. Srinivasan. An Efficient SQL-based RDF Querying Scheme. In VLDB'05, pages 1216--1227. VLDB Endowment, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Colucci, T. Di Noia, E. Di Sciascio, F. Donini, G. Piscitelli, and S. Coppi. Knowledge Based Approach to Semantic Composition of Teams in an Organization. In SAC 2005, pages 1314--1319. ACM, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Colucci, T. Di Noia, E. Di Sciascio, F. M. Donini, and M. Mongiello. Concept abduction and contraction for semantic-based discovery of matches and negotiation spaces in an e-marketplace. In ICEC '04, pages 41--50. ACM, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Colucci, T. Di Noia, E. Di Sciascio, F. M. Donini, and A. Ragone. Semantic-based skill management for automated task assignment and courseware composition. J. UCS, 13(9): 1184--1212, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Colucci, E. Tinelli, F. M. Donini, and E. Di Sciascio. Automating competence management through non-standard reasoning. EAAI, 24(8): 1368--1384, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. V. Delaitre and Y. Kazakov. Classifying ELH ontologies in SQL databases. In OWLED '09, volume 529 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. T. Di Noia, E. Di Sciascio, and F. M. Donini. Extending semantic-based matchmaking via concept abduction and contraction. In EKAW '04, volume 3257 of LNAI, pages 307--320. Springer, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Dolby, A. Fokoue, A. Kalyanpur, A. Kershenbaum, E. Schonberg, K. Srinivas, and L. Ma. Scalable semantic retrieval through summarization and refinement. In AAAI 2007, pages 299--304, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Ehrig, P. Haase, N. Stojanovic, and M. Hefke. Similarity for ontologies --- a comprehensive framework. In ECIS '05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. C. W. Holsapple and K. D. Joshi. A formal knowledge management ontology: Conduct, activities, resources, and influences: Research articles. 55(7): 593--612, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. W. Kießling. Foundations of Preferences in Database Systems. In VLDB'02, pages 311--322, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Ošleary. Enterprise knowledge management. IEEE Computer, 31(3): 54--61, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Ošeary. Using AI in knowledge management: Knowledge bases and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(3): 34--39, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. P. Bosc and O. Pivert. SQLf: a relational database language for fuzzy querying. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 3(1): 1--17, Feb. 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Staab, H. Schnurr, R. Studer, and Y. Knowledge Processes and Ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(1): 26--34, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Y. Sure, A. Maedche, and S. Staab. Leveraging Corporate Skill Knowledge - From ProPer to OntoProPer. In PAKM, pages 30--31, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. E. Tinelli, A. Cascone, M. Ruta, T. Di Noia, E. Di Sciascio, and F. M. Donini. I.M.P.A.K.T.: An Innovative Semantic-based Skill Management System Exploiting Standard SQL. In ICEIS 2009, pages 224--229, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. D. Trastour, C. Bartolini, and C. Priest. Semantic Web Support for the Business-to-Business E-Commerce Lifecycle. In WWW '02, pages 89--98. ACM, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. E. P. K. Tsang. Foundations of constraint satisfaction. Computation in cognitive science. Academic Press, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Knowledge compilation for automated Team Composition exploiting standard SQL

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '12: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
        March 2012
        2179 pages
        ISBN:9781450308571
        DOI:10.1145/2245276
        • Conference Chairs:
        • Sascha Ossowski,
        • Paola Lecca

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 March 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SAC '12 Paper Acceptance Rate270of1,056submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader