skip to main content
10.1145/2254129.2254144acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Influence patterns in topic communities of social media

Published:13 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Users of Social Media typically gather into communities on the basis of some common interest. Their interactions inside these on-line communities follow several, interesting patterns. For example, they differ in the level of influence they exert to the rest of the group: some community members are actively involved, affecting a large part of the community with their actions, while the majority comprises plain participants (e.g., information consumers). Identifying users of the former category lies on the focus of interest of many recent works, as they can be employed in a variety of applications, like targeted marketing.

In this paper, we build on previous research that examined influencers in the context of a popular Social Media web site, namely Twitter. Unlike existing works that consider its user base as a whole, we focus on communities that are created on-the-fly by people that post messages about a particular topic (i.e., topic communities). We examine a large and representative sample of real-world communities and evaluate to which extent their influential users determine the aggregate behavior of the entire community. To this end, we consider a practical use case: we check whether the community's overall sentiment stems from the aggregate sentiment of this core group. We also examine the dynamics of groups of influencers by assessing the strength of the ties between them. In addition, we identify patterns in the content produced by influencers and the relation between influencers of different communities. Our experiments lead to interesting conclusions that highlight many aspects of influencers' activity inside topic communities; thus, they form the basis for intelligent, data mining techniques that can automatically discover influencers in the context of a community.

References

  1. E. Bakshy, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason, and D. J. Watts. Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In WSDM, pages 65--74, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Barbosa and J. Feng. Robust sentiment detection on twitter from biased and noisy data. In COLING, pages 36--44, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Cha, H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, and P. K. Gummadi. Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. In ICWSM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. D. Choudhury, H. Sundaram, A. John, D. D. Seligmann, and A. Kelliher. "birds of a feather": Does user homophily impact information diffusion in social media? CoRR, abs/1006.1702, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Davidov, O. Tsur, and A. Rappoport. Enhanced sentiment learning using twitter hashtags and smileys. In COLING, pages 241--249, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. P. Domingos and M. Richardson. Mining the network value of customers. In KDD, pages 57--66, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Katz and P. Lazarsfeld. Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Transaction Pub, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. B. Moon. What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In WWW, pages 591--600, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. L. Liu, J. Tang, J. Han, M. Jiang, and S. Yang. Mining topic-level influence in heterogeneous networks. In CIKM, pages 199--208, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. Cook. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, 27:415--444, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Pak and P. Paroubek. Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In LREC, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Weng, E.-P. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He. Twitterrank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In WSDM, pages 261--270, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Yang and J. Leskovec. Patterns of temporal variation in online media. In WSDM, pages 177--186, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Influence patterns in topic communities of social media

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WIMS '12: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics
      June 2012
      571 pages
      ISBN:9781450309158
      DOI:10.1145/2254129

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate140of278submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader