skip to main content
10.1145/2254129.2254177acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Advanced agent discovery services

Published: 13 June 2012 Publication History

Abstract

The Semantic Web aims at augmenting the WWW with meaning, assisting people and machines in comprehending Web content and better satisfying their requests. Intelligent agents are considered to be greatly favored by Semantic Web technologies, because of the interoperability the latter will achieve. As a result, a plethora of multi-agent systems is already in use. One of the main problems in these systems is the lack of sufficient discovery and interaction monitoring tools. This paper reports on the design and implementation of advanced agent discovery services. These services are distinguished in two main categories; namely advanced semantic directory and discovery services (yellow pages) and trust-based discovery services which support among others interaction monitoring tools. Their implementation, including the associated graphical interface, was integrated into the EMERALD framework, a knowledge-based framework for interoperating agents. Finally, a software trade use case scenario is presented, which better displays the potential of the proposed approach.

References

[1]
Antoniou, G., and Bikakis, A. 2007. DR-Prolog: A System for Defeasible Reasoning with Rules and Ontologies on the SW. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 19,2.
[2]
Antoniou, G., Skylogiannis, T., Bikakis, A., Doerr, M., and Bassiliades, N. 2007. DR-BROKERING: A Semantic Brokering System. Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 61--72.
[3]
Bassiliades N., and Vlahavas I. 2006. R-DEVICE: An Object-Oriented Knowledge Base System for RDF Metadata. Int. J. on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 2(2): 24--90.
[4]
Bassiliades, N., Antoniou, G., and Vlahavas, I. 2006. A Defeasible Logic Reasoner for the Semantic Web. Int. J. on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 2(1):1--41.
[5]
Bellifemine, F., Caire, G., Poggi, A., and Rimassa, G. 2003. JADE: A white Paper. EXP in search of innovation, Vol. 3, No. 3. (2003), pp. 6--19.
[6]
Benjamins, R., Wielinga, B., Wielemaker, J., and Fensel, D. 1999. An Intelligent Agent for Brokering Problem-Solving Knowledge. IWANN (2), pp. 693--705.
[7]
Berners-Lee, T. 1999. Weaving the Web, Harper.
[8]
Berners-Lee, T., Hall, W., Hendler, J., O'Hara, K., Shadbolt, N., and Weitzner, D. 2006. A Framework for Web Science, Foundations and Trends in Web Science, Vol 1, No 1.
[9]
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. 2001. The Semantic Web. Scientific American Magazine. Vol. 284, No. 5, pp. 34--43, 2001 (Revised 2008)
[10]
Debenham, J. 2004. Multi-issue bargaining in an information-rich context. Knowledge-Based Systems, Volume 17, Issues 2--4, pp. 147--155.
[11]
Governatori, G., Dumas, M., Hofstedeter, A., and Oaks, P. 2001. A Formal Approach to Protocols and Strategies for (Legal) Negotiation. ICAIL 2001, pp. 168--177.
[12]
Hendler, J. 2001. Agents and the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2):30--37. DOI= http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/5254.920597.
[13]
Huynh, T., Jennings, N., and Shadbolt, N. 2006. Certified Reputation: how an agent can trust a stranger. In AAMAS '06: Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, Hokkaido, Japan.
[14]
Ilarri, S., Serrano, J. L., Mena, E., and Trillo, R. 2007. 3D Monitoring of Distributed Multiagent Systems. Third International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST'07), INSTICC Press, ISBN 978-9728865-77-1, pp. 439--442.
[15]
JESS, http://www.jessrules.com/.
[16]
Kozlenkov, A., Penaloza, R., Nigam, V., Royer, L., Dawelbait, G., and Schroeder, M. 2006. Prova: Rule-based Java Scripting for Distributed Web Applications: A Case Study in Bioinformatics. Workshop on Reactivity on the Web at the International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT 2006). Springer, pp.899--908.
[17]
Kravari, K., Kontopoulos, E., and Bassiliades, N. 2009. A Trusted Defeasible Reasoning Service for Brokering Agents in the Semantic Web. 3rd Int. Symp. on Intelligent Distributed Computing (IDC'09), Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Vol. 237, pp. 243--248.
[18]
Kravari, K., Kontopoulos, E., and Bassiliades, N. 2009. Towards a Knowledge-based Framework for Agents Interacting in the Semantic Web, IEEE/WIC/ACM Int. Conf. on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT'09), Vol. 2, pp. 482--485.
[19]
Kravari, K., Kontopoulos, E., and Bassiliades, N. 2010. EMERALD: A Multi-Agent System for Knowledge-based Reasoning Interoperability in the Semantic Web, 6th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SETN 2010), LNCS, Vol. 6040/2010, pp. 173--182.
[20]
Kravari, K., Kontopoulos, E., and Bassiliades, N. 2010. Trusted Reasoning Services for Semantic Web Agents, Informatica: International Journal of Computing and Informatics, 34(4), pp. 429--440.
[21]
Kravari, K., Malliarakis, C., and Bassiliades, N. 2010. T-REX: A hybrid agent trust model based on witness reputation and personal experience. In Proceeding of 11th International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies (EC-Web 2010), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (LNBIP), Vol. 61, Part 3, Springer, pp. 107--118.
[22]
Kravari, K., Papatheodorou, K., Antoniou, G., and Bassiliades, N. 2011. Reasoning and Proofing Services for Semantic Web Agents. In proceedings of the 22nd International Join Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2011). AAAI Press, Best Paper Track, Vol.3, pp. 2662--2667.
[23]
Lam, H., and Governatori, G. 2009. The Making of SPINdle. RuleML-2009 Int. Symp. on Rule Interchange and Applications, Springer, pp. 315--322.
[24]
Macarthur, K. 2008. Trust and Reputation in Multi-Agent Systems. AAMAS 2008.
[25]
Mostafa, H., and Bahgat, R. 2005. The agent visualization system: a graphical and textual representation for multi-agent systems. Information Visualization, 4(2):83--94.
[26]
Nute, D. 1987. Defeasible Reasoning, 20th Int. Conference on Systems Science, IEEE Press, pp. 470--477.
[27]
Petit, C., and Magaud, F.-X. 2006. Multiagent meta-model for strategic decision support. Knowledge-Based Systems, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp. 202--211.
[28]
Sidner, C. L. 1994. Negotiation in collaborative activity: a discourse analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp. 265--267.
[29]
The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA): Specifications. 2002. Available at http://www.fipa.org/specifications.
[30]
Zacharia, G., Moukas, A., and Maes, P. 2000. Collaborative reputation mechanisms for electronic marketplaces. Decision Support Systems, 29:371--388.
[31]
Lee, K. M., Kim, H.-J., Shin H.-J., and Shin, D. R. 2006. Design and Implementation of Middleware for Context-Aware Service Discovery in Ubiquitous Computing Environments. International Conference on Communication Systems and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3983, pp. 483--490

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)A policy-based B2C e-Contract management workflow methodology using semantic web agentsArtificial Intelligence and Law10.1007/s10506-016-9177-224:2(93-131)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2016
  • (2012)HARMProceedings of the 6th international conference on Rules on the Web: research and applications10.1007/978-3-642-32689-9_15(193-207)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2012

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WIMS '12: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics
June 2012
571 pages
ISBN:9781450309158
DOI:10.1145/2254129
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • UCV: University of Craiova
  • WNRI: Western Norway Research Institute

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 June 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. discovery services
  2. intelligent agents
  3. semantic web

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WIMS '12
Sponsor:
  • UCV
  • WNRI

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 140 of 278 submissions, 50%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)A policy-based B2C e-Contract management workflow methodology using semantic web agentsArtificial Intelligence and Law10.1007/s10506-016-9177-224:2(93-131)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2016
  • (2012)HARMProceedings of the 6th international conference on Rules on the Web: research and applications10.1007/978-3-642-32689-9_15(193-207)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2012

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media