skip to main content
10.1145/2254129.2254199acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Semantically-enhanced authoring of defeasible logic rule bases in the semantic web

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Semantic Web represents an initiative to improve the current Web, by augmenting content with semantics and encouraging cooperation among human and software agents. The development of the logic and proof layers of the Semantic Web is currently concentrating the related research effort and is vital, since these layers allow systems to infer new knowledge from existing information, assisting them in explaining their actions and, ultimately, increasing user trust towards the Semantic Web. However, there is a lack of applications that could contribute towards developing logic-based applications. Consequently, users resort to inadequate tools that offer syntactic support, without being able to support the user semantically as well. This work presents S2DRREd, a software tool that introduces a supplementary level of semantic assistance during rule base development. The tool allows creating meta-models of the main notions of the loaded rule sets and assists the user in authoring rule bases, independently of the explicitly chosen rule language syntax. The domain of application is defeasible logic, a type of logic that allows reasoning with incomplete and conflicting information and, as such, it can play an increasingly important role in a drastically dynamic environment like the Web.

References

  1. Bassiliades, N., Antoniou, G., & Vlahavas, I. 2006. A Defeasible Logic Reasoner for the Semantic Web. Int. J. on Semantic Web and Information Systems 2, 1, Sheth, A., & Lytras, M. D. (Eds.), IDEA Group Publishing, 1--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler J., & Lassila O. 2001. The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284, 5, 34--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Boley, H. 2003. Object-Oriented RuleML: User-Level Roles, URI-Grounded Clauses, and Order-Sorted Terms. Proc. Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web (RuleML-2003). Sanibel Island, Florida, LNCS 2876, Springer-Verlag, 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Boley, H. 2006. The RuleML Family of Web Rule Languages. In Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning. Springer, 1--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Boley, H. 2010. Integrating Positional and Slotted Knowledge on the Semantic Web. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence 2, 4, 343--353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Craig, B. 2007. The OO jDREW Engine of Rule Responder: Naf Hornlog RuleML Query Answering. Proc. Int. Conf. on Advances in Rule Interchange and Applications (RuleML'07), Paschke, A., & Biletskiy, Y. (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 149--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gasse, F., & Haarslev, V. 2008. DLRule: A Rule Editor Plug-in for Protéégé. Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions (OWLED 2008). Washington, DC, USA, April 1--2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Horrocks, I., & Patel-Schneider, P. F. 2004. A Proposal for an OWL Rules Language. Proc. 13th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web (WWW '04). ACM, NY, USA, 723--731. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kontopoulos, E., Bassiliades, N., & Antoniou, G. 2011. Visualizing Semantic Web Proofs of Defeasible Logic in the DR-DEVICE System. Knowledge-based Systems 24, 3, Elsevier, 406--419. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Nute, D. 1994. Defeasible Logic. Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Gabbay, D. M., Hogger, C. J., and Robinson, J. A. (Eds.). Vol. 3, Oxford University Press, 353--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. O'Connor, M. J., Knublauch, H., Tu, S. W., Grossof, B., Dean, M., Grosso, W. E., & Musen, M. A. 2005. Supporting Rule System Interoperability on the Semantic Web with SWRL. Proc. 4th Int. Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Galway, Ireland, Springer Verlag, LNCS 3729, 974--986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ortega, A. M., Alcaraz Calero, J. M., Botía Blaya, J. A., Martínez Pérez, G., & Garcíía Clemente, F. J. 2010. Knowledge Authoring with ORE: Testing, Debugging and Validating Knowledge Rules in a Semantic Web Framework. J. UCS 16, 2, 1234--1266.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Reynolds, D. 2010. OWL 2 RL in RIF. W3C Working Group Note 22 June 2010. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-owl-rl/#Background_OWL_2_RL, last access: November 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Semantically-enhanced authoring of defeasible logic rule bases in the semantic web

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WIMS '12: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics
      June 2012
      571 pages
      ISBN:9781450309158
      DOI:10.1145/2254129

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate140of278submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader