skip to main content
10.1145/2254756.2254768acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmetricsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bundling practice in BitTorrent: what, how, and why

Published:11 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We conduct comprehensive measurements on the current practice of content bundling to understand the structural patterns of torrents and the participant behaviors of swarms on one of the largest BitTorrent portals: The Pirate Bay. From the datasets of the 120K torrents and 14.8M peers, we investigate what constitutes torrents and how users participate in swarms from the perspective of bundling, across different content categories: Movie, TV, Porn, Music, Application, Game and E-book. In particular, we focus on: (1) how prevalent content bundling is, (2) how and what files are bundled into torrents, (3) what motivates publishers to bundle files, and (4) how peers access the bundled files. We find that over 72% of BitTorrent torrents contain multiple files, which indicates that bundling is widely used for file sharing. We reveal that profit-driven BitTorrent publishers who promote their own web sites for financial gains like advertising tend to prefer to use the bundling. We also observe that most files (94%) in a bundle torrent are selected by users and the bundle torrents are more popular than the single (or non-bundle) ones on average. Overall, there are notable differences in the structural patterns of torrents and swarm characteristics (i) across different content categories and (ii) between single and bundle torrents.

References

  1. Availability, vuze. http://wiki.vuze.com/w/Availability.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bittorrent tracker protocol. http://wiki.theory.org/BitTorrent_Tracker_Protocol.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Open sourced bittorrent client, vuze. http://www.vuze.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Peer exchange. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_exchange.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. The pirate bay. http://thepiratebay.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sandvine global internet phenomena report: Fall 2011. http://www.sandvine.com/news/global_broadband_trends.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. W. J. Adams and J. L. Yellen. Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(3):475--498, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Y. Bakos and E. Brynjolfsson. Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Science, 45(12):1613--1630, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. Carlsson, D. L. Eager, and A. Mahanti. Using torrent inflation to efficiently serve the long tail in peer-assisted content delivery systems. In IFIP Networking, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R. Cuevas, M. Kryczka, A. Cuevas, S. Kaune, C. Guerrero, and R. Rejaie. Is content publishing in bittorrent altruistic or profit-driven? In ACM CoNEXT, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G. Dan and N. Carlsson. Dynamic swarm management for improved bittorrent performance. In IPTPS, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Fuerderer, A. Herrmann, and G. Wuebker. Optimal Bundling: Marketing Strategies for Improving Economic Performance. Springer, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. L. Guo, S. Chen, Z. Xiao, E. Tan, X. Ding, and X. Zhang. Measurements, analysis, and modeling of bittorrent-like systems. In ACM IMC, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Joseph Lee and N. W. Alan. Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician, 42(1):59--66, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Legout, N. Liogkas, E. Kohler, and L. Zhang. Clustering and sharing incentives in bittorrent systems. In ACM SIGMETRICS, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Legout, G. Urvoy-Keller, and P. Michiardi. Rarest first and choke algorithms are enough. In ACM IMC, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. N. Lev-tov, N. Carlsson, Z. Li, C. Williamson, and S. Zhang. Dynamic file-selection policies for bundling in bittorrent-like systems. In IEEE IWQOS, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. D. S. Menasche, G. Neglia, D. Towsley, and S. Zilberstein. Strategic reasoning about bundling in swarming systems. In IEEE GameNets, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. S. Menasche, A. A. Rocha, B. Li, D. Towsley, and A. Venkataramani. Content availability and bundling in swarming systems. In ACM CoNEXT}, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. S. Peterson and E. G. Sirer. Antfarm: efficient content distribution with managed swarms. In USENIX NSDI, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Piatek, T. Isdal, T. Anderson, A. Krishnamurthy, and A. Venkataramani. Do incentives build robustness in bittorrent. In USENIX NSDI, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. Piatek, T. Isdal, A. Krishnamurthy, and T. Anderson. One hop reputations for peer to peer file sharing workloads. In USENIX NSDI, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. E. W. Pugh. Origins of software bundling. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 24(1):57--58, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. D. Qiu and R. Srikant. Modeling and performance analysis of bittorrent-like peer-to-peer networks. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. P. Raghubir. Free gift with purchase: Promoting or discounting the brand? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1--2):181--186, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. M. A. Salinger. A graphical analysis of bundling. Journal of Business}, 68(1):85--98, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. A. Sherman, J. Nieh, and C. Stein. Fairtorrent: bringing fairness to peer-to-peer systems. In ACM CoNEXT, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. M. Sirivianos, J. Han, P. Rex, and C. X. Yang. Free-riding in bittorrent networks with the large view exploit. In IPTPS, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Y. Tian, D. Wu, and K.-W. Ng. Analyzing multiple file downloading in bittorrent. In IEEE ICCP, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. R. B. Wilson. Strategic models of entry deterrence. Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, 1(1):305--329, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Y. Yang, A. L. H. Chow, and L. Golubchik. Multi-torrent: A performance study. In IEEE MASCOTS, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. S. Zhang, N. Carlsson, D. Eager, Z. Li, and A. Mahanti. Towards a dynamic file bundling system for large-scale content distribution. In IEEE MASCOTS, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bundling practice in BitTorrent: what, how, and why

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMETRICS '12: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGMETRICS/PERFORMANCE joint international conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems
      June 2012
      450 pages
      ISBN:9781450310970
      DOI:10.1145/2254756
      • cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
        ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 40, Issue 1
        Performance evaluation review
        June 2012
        433 pages
        ISSN:0163-5999
        DOI:10.1145/2318857
        Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate459of2,691submissions,17%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader