Edgar Serna M.
ABSTRACT
The revolution in informatics introduced many social changes among which stands the shape and speed how people acquire knowledge and process information. Generally, the application of this technology has been directed by academic research, which in turn has allowed its massification, for both educational and industrial use. In training, one of his more recent contributions is the paradigm of "Learning Objects" LO and, although its development is an interesting field of research because of the high interoperability of the community, the software engineering proposal so far to develop still has gaps. The LO is designed to satisfy educational objectives in the same way that an information system is designed to satisfy customer requirements, so that both development processes have many similarities. This paper presents the proposal of "Ingeniería de Software para Desarrollar Objetos de Aprendizaje" ISDOA, in which is implementing an innovator life cycle in the field of research in LO.
- IEEE. 2002. Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata. IEEE 1484.12.1-2002. Learning Technology Standards Committee of the IEEE.Google Scholar
- Wiley, D. 2002. The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Agency for Instructional Technology, 571--577. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liber, O. 2005. Learning objects: conditions for viability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 5, 366--373.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gagné, R. M. 1965. The conditions of learning. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Bianchini, A. 1992. Metodología para el desarrollo de aplicaciones educativas en ambientes multimedios. Trabajo de ascenso a la categoría de Profesor Asociado en la Escuela de Ingeniería de Sistemas, Cap. IV. Universidad Metropolitana de Caracas.Google Scholar
- Dorrego, E. 1994. Modelo para la producción y evaluación formativa de medios instruccionales, aplicado al video y al software. Revista de Tecnología Educativa, 12, 3, 313--327.Google Scholar
- Daziel, J. 2002. Reflections on the COLIS (Collaborative Online Learning and Information Systems) Demonstrator Project and the "Learning Object Lifecycle". In Proceedings of the ASCILITE 2002 Conference. Auckland, New Zealand, Dec. 8--11.Google Scholar
- Polo, M. 2003. Aproximación a un Modelo de Diseño: ADITE. Docencia Universitaria, 4, 1, 67--83.Google Scholar
- Madueño, L. A. 2003. Desarrollo de Software Educativo bajo Plataforma Web. En Congreso Internacional EDUTEC 2003, Gestión de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación en los Diferentes Ámbitos Educativos, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Nov. 24 a 28.Google Scholar
- Boyle, T. 2003. Design principles for authoring dynamic, reusable learning objects. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19, 1, 46--58.Google Scholar
- Pfleeger, S. L. 2009. Software engineering: Theory and practice. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Strijker, A. 2004. Reuse of Learning Objects in Context: Human and Technical Aspects. PrintPartners Ipskamp.Google Scholar
- Azpeitia, I., Monge, S. & Ovelar, R. 2005. Una Aproximacióón al Diseño de una Guía de Buenas Prácticas en torno al Paradigma de los Learning Objects. En II Simposio Pluridisciplinar sobre Diseño, Evaluación y Descripción de Contenidos Educativos Reutilizables. Barcelona, España, Oct. 19--21.Google Scholar
- Gruene, M., Lenz, K. & Oberweis, A. 2005. Pricing of Learning Objects in a Workflow-Based E-Learning Scenario. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS '05. Big Island, Hawaii, Jan. 3--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peláez, S. G. & Lóópez, B. 2006. Metodología para el Desarrollo de Software Educativo (DESED). UPIICSA, 14, 6, 41--42.Google Scholar
- Díaz-Antón, M. G. et al. 2006. Propuesta de una metodología de desarrollo de software educativo bajo un enfoque de calidad sistémica. Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas, Venezuela.Google Scholar
- de Marcos, L. et al. 2007. Reflections on e-learning lifecycle and learning objects lifecycle. In International Technology, Education and Development Conference INTED2007. Valencia, Spain, March 7--9.Google Scholar
- Delgado, J. A. et al. 2007. Desarrollo de objetos de aprendizaje basado en patrones. En VIII Encuentro Internacional Virtual Educa Brasil 2007. Sao José dos Campos, Jun. 18--22.Google Scholar
- Barajas, S. A. et al. 2009. Developing Large Scale Learning Objects for Software Engineering Process Model through MIDOA Model. In 2009 Mexican International Conference on Computer Science (ENC). México, Sept. 21--25, 203--208. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Abud, M. A. 2009. MeISE: Metodología de Ingeniería de Software Educativo. Revista Internacional de Educación en Ingeniería, 2, 1, 1--9.Google Scholar
- Caro, M. F. et al. 2009. Diseño de software educativo basado en competencias. Ciencia e Ingeniería Neogranadina, 19, 1, 71--98.Google Scholar
- Grewal, A. et al. 2005. The E-Learning Lifecycle and its Services: The Web Services Approach. In Second International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society. Bangkok, Thailand, Aug. 4--7.Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. A. 1983. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Herrmann, W. D. 1996. The Whole Brain Business Book. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Gardner, H. 1983. Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Gagné, R. M. 1985. The conditions of learning and Theory of Instruction. Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
- Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E. & Allen, D. E. (Eds). 2001. The Power of Problem-Based Learning. FALMER/KP.Google Scholar
- Serna, M. E. 2011. Análisis y comparación de las propuestas recientes para diseñar casos de prueba desde los casos de uso orientados a verificar los aspectos funcionales del software. MsC. Thesis. Universidad Nacional de Colombia Medellín.Google Scholar
- Serna, M. E. 2011. Management requirements engineering using a semi-formal model. In press.Google Scholar
- Serna, M. E.; Castro, C. C. & Botero, T. R. 2011. Una propuesta de plan de pruebas para la Verificacióón y Validación de Objetos de Aprendizaje. In press.Google Scholar
- Pozo, J. I. et al. 1994. La solución de Problemas. Editorial Santillana.Google Scholar
- Tecnológico de Monterey. Diseño de Problemas. Online http://www.itesm.mx/va/diie/tecnicasdidacticas/2_6.htm {Sep. 2011}.Google Scholar
- Carneson, J., Delpierre, G. & Masters, K. 1996. Designing and Managing Multiple Choice Questions. Appendix C: Multiple Choice questions and Bloom's Taxonomy. University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
- Castro, C. C. A. 2011. Proceso Ágil De Ingeniería Del Software Para Objetos Virtuales De Aprendizaje, PAISOVA. III Jornadas de Investigación Facultad de Ingenierías, JOIN 2011, 133--137. Universidad de San Buenaventura Medellín.Google Scholar
- Caudill, B. & Banks, D. 2006. Instructional Designer's Pocket Guide to SCORM. JCA Solutions.Google Scholar
- Jardey, S. O. et al. 2006. Diseño, desarrollo e implementación de objetos pedagógicos virtuales de aprendizaje en el marco de proyectos pedagógicos de aula. Investigación e innovación en la enseñanza de las ciencias, 1, 2, 24--28.Google Scholar
- Astudillo, G. J. & Willging, P. A. 2009. Uso de Repositorios de Objetos de Aprendizaje de Libre Acceso. Online Virtual educa. {Marzo 2011}.Google Scholar
- Domínguez de la Rosa, J. J. 2009. Diseño e implementación de un objeto virtual de aprendizaje para la introducción a la programación de computadores. En IV Congreso Online del Observatorio para la Cibersociedad. España, Nov. 12--29.Google Scholar
- Haughey, M. & Muirhead, B. 2004. Evaluating learning objects for schools. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 8,1. University of Southern Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
- Pisik, G. B. 1997. Is this course instructionally sound? A guide to evaluating online training courses. Educational Technology, 37, 4, 50--59.Google Scholar
- Retalis, S. (2004). Usable and interoperable e-learning resources and repositories. In S. Mishra & R. C. Sharma (Eds.), Interactive multimedia in education and training. IGI Global.Google Scholar
- Riddy, P. & Fill, K. 2004. Evaluating e-learning resources. Paper presented at the Networked Learning Conference, Lancaster, UK, April 5--7.Google Scholar
- Medina, D., Hermida C. J. & Montoyo, A. 2009. A new proposal for learning object quality evaluation based on ontology. In 1st International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. Barcelona, Spain, July 6--8.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- SEDLO: software engineering for developing learning objects
Recommendations
PLORS: a personalized learning object recommender system
Learning management systems (LMS) are typically used by large educational institutions and focus on supporting instructors in managing and administrating online courses. However, such LMS typically use a "one size fits all" approach without considering ...
Organizational schemata of e-portfolios for fostering higher-order thinking
The information technology of online e-portfolio systems have been widely used during the past several years along with the diffusion of electronic teaching-learning systems. However, for the time being e-portfolio is viewed more as an assessment tool ...
An online authoring tool for creating activity-based learning objects
As higher education increasingly relies on e-learning, the need for tools that will allow teachers themselves to develop effective e-learning objects as simply and quickly as possible has also been increasingly recognized. This article discusses the ...
Comments