skip to main content
10.1145/2305484.2305509acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseicsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Weighted faceted browsing for characteristics-based visualization selection through end users

Published:25 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Faceted browsing is a widely spread, intuitive, and interactive search paradigm for information collections based on the metadata of its items. However, it has the problem that every selected criterion is mandatory so that less important ones may reduce the result set and interesting items may be removed unintentionally. On the other hand, choosing only very few facets yields to an unmanageable set of items wherein the best ones do not become obvious. In this paper, we propose weighted faceted browsing, which seamlessly extends the existing faceted browsing paradigm. Besides basic filtering capabilities, it provides a sophisticated relevance ranking of the result set based on the distinction between mandatory and weighted optional search criteria. Further, we show its practicability within an information visualization workbench to facilitate the end user's search for visualization components based on their characteristics.

References

  1. Apache Software Foundation. Apache Lucene, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Castaignet, V., and Vavrille, F. Musicovery.com, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dachselt, R., Frisch, M., and Weiland, M. Facetzoom: a continuous multi-scale widget for navigating hierarchical metadata. In Proc. of the 26th conf. on Human factors in computing systems (CHI'08) (2008), 1353--1356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gilson, O., Silva, N., Grant, P., and Chen, M. From web data to visualization via ontology mapping. In Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 27 (2008), 959--966. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Grammel, L., Tory, M., and Storey, M.-A. How information visualization novices construct visualizations. In Proc. InfoVis 2010 (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hearst, M. A. Search User Interfaces. Cambridge University Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Heim, P., Ertl, T., and Ziegler, J. Facet graphs: Complex semantic querying made easy. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, vol. 6088. 2010, 288--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Huynh, D., and Karger, D. Parallax and companion: set-based browsing for the dataweb, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Katifori, A., Halatsis, C., Lepouras, G., Vassilakis, C., and Giannopoulou, E. Ontology visualization methods - a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 39 (2007), 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Keck, M., Kammer, D., Iwan, R., Taranko, S., and Groh, R. Delviz: Exploration of tagged information visualizations. In Informatik 2011 - Interaktion und Visualisierung im Daten-Web (Berlin, 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lengler, R., and Eppler, M. J. Towards a periodic table of visualization methods for management. In Proc. of the Conf. on Graphics and Visualization in Engineering (GVE 2007) (2007), 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mackinlay, J., Hanrahan, P., and Stolte, C. Show me: Automatic presentation for visual analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6 (Nov. 2007), 1137--1144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Miettinen, K. Some methods for nonlinear multi-objective optimization. In Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, vol. 1993. 2001, 1--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Pietschmann, S., Nestler, T., and Daniel, F. Application composition at the presentation layer: Alternatives and open issues. In Proc. of the 12th Intl. Conf. on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services (iiWAS 2010), ACM (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Polowinski, J. Widgets for faceted browsing. In Human Interface and the Management of Information. Designing Information Environments, vol. 5617. 2009, 601--610. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Robertson, S. E., and Jones, K. S. Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27, 3 (1976), 129--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sacco, G. M., and Tzitzikas, Y. Dynamic Taxonomies and Faceted Search: Theory, Practice, and Experience. Springer, New York, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Schmitt, I., Schulz, N., and Saake, G. Multi-level weighting in multimedia retrieval systems. In XML-Based Data Management and Multimedia Engineering EDBT 2002 Workshops, vol. 2490. 2002, 524--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Tvarožek, M., and Bieliková, M. Collaborative multi-paradigm exploratory search. In Proc. of the Hypertext 2008 workshop on Collaboration and collective intelligence (2008), 29--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Voigt, M., Pietschmann, S., Grammel, L., and Meißner, K. Context-aware recommendation of visualization components. In Proc. of the 4th Intern. Conf. on Information, Process, and Knowledge Management (eKNOW '12) (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Voigt, M., Pietschmann, S., and Meißner, K. Towards a semantics-based, end-user-centered information visualization process. In Proc. of the 3rd Intern. Workshop on Semantic Models for Adaptive Interacive Systems (SEMAIS '12) (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Yee, K.-P., Swearingen, K., Li, K., and Hearst, M. Faceted metadata for image search and browsing. In Proc. of the Conf. on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '03) (2003), 401--408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Weighted faceted browsing for characteristics-based visualization selection through end users

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        EICS '12: Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems
        June 2012
        350 pages
        ISBN:9781450311687
        DOI:10.1145/2305484

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 June 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate73of299submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        EICS '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader