skip to main content
10.1145/2317956.2317959acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Crafting quality in design: integrity, creativity, and public sensibility

Published:11 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to enrich the design research community's notions of quality by turning to the techniques and values of master craftspeople. We describe and analyze interviews conducted with elite craft practitioners in the US and Taiwan to consider how they perceive and produce quality. The crafters articulate a consensus view of interaction with integrity. American participants tend to frame their understanding of quality in terms of self-expression through a creative interaction with materials, while participants from Taiwan emphasize the role of communities in establishing---and benefitting from---craft quality. As HCI continues to turn to design approaches on account of their strengths producing works of socio-cultural relevance and value, our study sheds light on the qualities of interacting with integrity, the pleasures of self-expression through creative interaction with materials, and the practical benefits of positioning creative work in relation to the material resources, aesthetic tastes, and socio-economic needs of a public.

References

  1. Bardzell, J. Interaction criticism: An introduction to the practice. Interacting with Computers 23 (6), 2011, 604--621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S. "Pleasure is your birthright": Digitally enabled designer sex toys as a case of third-wave HCI. Proc. of CHI'10, ACM Press (2011), 257--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bardzell, S. Feminist HCI: Taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. Proc. of CHI'10. ACM Press (2010), 1301--1310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Binder, T., P. Ehn, G. De Michelis, and G. Jacucci. 2011. Design Things. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Blevis, E. Sustainable interaction design: Invention, disposal, renewal & Waste. Proc. CHI'07. ACM press (2007), 503--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., and Sengers, P. Affect: From information to interpretation. Proc. of AARHUS'05, ACM Press (2005), 59--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Burrell, J., and K. Toyama. 2009. "What constitutes good ICTD research." Information Technologies and International Development 5(3):82--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, J. L. The Encyclopedia of Taiwan Nature Dyeing. Taichung Culture Center: Taichung, Taiwan, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cross, N. Designerly Ways of Knowing. Basel: Birkhauser, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dimond, J., Fiesler, C., and Bruckman, A. Domestic violence and information communication technologies. In Bardzell, S., and Churchill, E. (eds.). Special Issue: Feminism and HCI: New Perspectives. Interacting with Computers (in press). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gowlland, G. 2009. "Learning to See Value: Exchange and the Politics of Vision in a Chinese Craft." Ethnos 74(2):229--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Greenberg, S. & Buxton, B. (2008). Usability considered harmful (some of the time). Proc of CHI ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Grasseni, C. 2004. "Skilled vision. An apprenticeship in breeding aesthetics." Social Anthropology 12(1):41--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hassenzahl, M. Needs, affect, and interactive products: Facets of user experience. Interacting with Computers 22 (2010) 353--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ingold, T. "Walking the plank: meditations on a process of skill." Defining technological literacy: towards an epistemological framework New York, Palgrave Macmillan. (2006)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, J. S., and J. M. Hawley. Technology's impact on creative traditions: Pieceful co-existence in quilting. Clothing and Textiles Res J 22(1--2):69, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J. and Wensveen, S. Design Research through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kreps, C. F. Liberating culture: cross-cultural perspectives on museums, curation, and heritage preservation. Psychology Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuutti, K. HCI and design: uncomfortable bedfellows? In Binder, Löwgren & Malmborg (eds.) (Re)searching the Digital Bauhaus. London: Springer, 2009, 43--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin, X. J. Reestablishing the prosperity for craft: Border-crossing of craft in the context of cultural creative industry. Taiwan Craft. Vol. 37 (2010), 6--11. NTCRI: CaoTun, Taiwan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ling, X (ed.). From Art Craft to Craft Industry: Community Craft Cultivating and Development Plan Collection 2009. NTRCI: Caotun, Taiwan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Löwgren, J. & Stolterman, E. 2004 Thoughtful Interaction Design. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. Technology as Experience. The MIT Press, MA, USA, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. McCullough, M. Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand. MIT Press, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Nelson H. & Stolterman, E. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ogden, C., Richards, I. A. The Meaning of Meaning. Mariner Books, New York, USA, 1923.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Pye, D. The nature and art of workmanship. Cambridge UP, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosner, D., and J. Bean. Learning from IKEA hacking: i'm not one to decoupage a tabletop and call it a day." In Proc. of CHI'09. ACM (2009), 419--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Rosner, D. K., and A. S. Taylor. Antiquarian answers: book restoration as a resource for design. Proc. of CHI'11. ACM Press(2011), 2665--2668. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sennett, Richard. The craftsman. Yale University Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Schön, D. A. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic books, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Shusterman, R. Pragmatist Aesthetics: Living Beauty, Rethinking Art. 2000. Rowman & Littlefield.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Taiwan Life Aesthetic Movement. http://lifearts.cca.gov.tw/Index.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor, A. S. Out there. Proc. of CHI'11. ACM Press (2011), 685--694. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Torrey, C., E. F. Churchill, and D. W. McDonald. Learning how: the search for craft knowledge on the internet. Proc. of CHI'09. ACM Press (2009), 1371--1380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Wallace, J., Jackson, D., Ladha C., Patrick, O., Monk, A., Blythe, M., and Wright, P. Digital jewelry and family relationships. Workshop on the Family and Communication Technologies, Newcastle, UK, 2007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Wolf, T. V., J. A. Rode, J. Sussman, and W. A. Kellogg. 2006. "Dispelling design as the black art of CHI." Pp. 521--530 in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Zimmerman, J. Designing for the self: making products that help people become the person they desire to be. In Proc of CHI '09. ACM Press (2009), 395--404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Crafting quality in design: integrity, creativity, and public sensibility

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '12: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      June 2012
      828 pages
      ISBN:9781450312103
      DOI:10.1145/2317956

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader