skip to main content
10.1145/2317956.2317988acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding personal digital collections: an interdisciplinary exploration

Published:11 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Once undertaken primarily by museum professionals, the activity of curatorship has been popularized via the Web. Social media tools, such as YouTube playlists and Pinterest Web bulletin boards, enable users to curate a diverse range of materials for personal use and for broader publication. But what makes one set of "curated" items more interesting than another? In this paper, we show how findings from an initial humanistic inquiry led to a lab-based user experiment, and how combined insights from these studies have illuminated new research streams in both humanistic and design research modes.

References

  1. J. Bardzell. Interaction criticism and aesthetics. Proceedings of ACM CHI, 2357--2366, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Bardzell, J. Bolter, and J. Lowgren. Interaction criticism: three readings of an interaction design, and what they get us. Interactions, 32--37, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Bawarshi. Genre and the invention of the writer. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. V. Bhatia. Worlds of written discourse. London and New York: Continuum, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Bazerman. Shaping written knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press., 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dr.Dada. Dr.Dada's color collection. Seattle Art Museum Web site, 2007. Retrieved January 16, 2012, from http://www.seattleartmuseum.org/emuseum/code/emuseum.asp?emu_action=searchrequest&moduleid=6&profile=mySAM&currentrecord=1&style=single&rawsearch=mysamid/,/is/,/113/,/false/,/falseGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. U. Eco. The infinity of lists. McEwen, Alastair, trans. New York: Rizzoli, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Filippini-Fantoni and J. Bowen. Bookmarking in museums: extending the experience beyond the visit? Proceedings Museums and the Web, 2007. Available at: http://www.archimuse.com/mw2007/papers/filippini-fantoni/filippini-fantoni.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Feinberg. Personal expressive bibliography in the public space of cultural heritage institutions. Library Trends 59(4): 588--606, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. G. Geisler. Open Video Digital Library Toolkit software. Documented at http://www.open-video-toolkit.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. W. Davies King. Collections of nothing. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Laurenmurphy. Laurenmurphy's "my favorite works" collection. Seattle Art Museum Web site, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2012, from http://www.seattleartmuseum.org/emuseum/code/emuseum.asp?emu_action=searchrequest&moduleid=6&profile=mySAM&currentrecord=1&style=single&rawsearch=mysamid/,/is/,/798/,/false/,/falseGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Lowgren and E. Stolterman. Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Marty. My lost museum: user expectations and motivations for creating personal digital collections on museum websites. Library and Information Science Research, 33(3): 211--219, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. P. Marty and M. Kazmer. Introduction to understanding users. Library Trends 59(4): 563--567, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Michelem. Michelem's modern and contemporary collection. Seattle Art Museum, 2007. Retrieved January 16, 2012, from http://www.seattleartmuseum.org/emuseum/code/emuseum.asp?emu_action=searchrequest&moduleid=6&profile=mySAM&currentrecord=1&style=single&rawsearch=mysamid/,/is/,/162/,/false/,/falseGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. C. Miller. Genre as social action. Reprinted in A. Freedman and P. Medway, eds. Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. rodrigue. Clinical decision making, a Penn Tags project by rodrigue. University of Pennsylvania Libraries Web site. No date. Retrieved January 16, 2012, from http://tags.library.upenn.edu/project/3984Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. Spinuzzi. Tracing genres through organizations: a sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. Williams. On the tip of creative tongues. New York Times, October 4, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. J. Yates. Control through communication: the rise of the system in American management. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Understanding personal digital collections: an interdisciplinary exploration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '12: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      June 2012
      828 pages
      ISBN:9781450312103
      DOI:10.1145/2317956

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader