skip to main content
10.1145/2330601.2330627acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What to do with actionable intelligence: E2Coach as an intervention engine

Published:29 April 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe a new, analytics driven approach to supporting students in large introductory physics courses. For this project, we have assembled data for more than 49,000 physics students at the University of Michigan. For each, we combine an extensive portrait of background and preparation with details of progress through the course and final outcome. This information allows us to construct models predicting student performance with a dispersion of half a letter grade. We explore residuals to this model, conducting structured interviews with students who did better (and worse) than expected, identifying strategies which lead to student success (and failure) at all levels of preparation. This work was done in preparation for the launch of E2Coach: a computer tailored educational coaching project which provides a model for an intervention engine, capable of dealing with actionable information for thousands of students.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., Conrad, F. G., & Corbett, A. T. (1989). Skill acquisition and the LISP Tutor, Cognitive Science, 13, 467--506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Du Bulay, et al., 2010, Towards Systems That Care: A Conceptual Framework based on Motivation, Metacognition and Affect, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 20, http://iaied.org/pub/1310/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Hayes, R. Q., Whalen, S. K., and Cannon, B., 2009, CSRDE STEM retention report, Center for Institutional Data Exchange and Analysis, University of Oklahoma, Norman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. http://chcr.umich.edu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Koedinger, K., Anderson, J., Hadley, W., and Mark, M., 1997, Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Miller, Kate, 2011, Gender Matters: Assessing and Addressing the Persistent Gender Gap in Physics Education, University of Michigan Honors Senior Thesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Miyake, Akira, Lauren E Kost-Smith, Noah D Finkelstein, Steven J Pollock, Geoffrey L Cohen, and Tiffany a Ito. 2010. Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: a classroom study of values affirmation. Science (New York, N. Y.) 330, no. 6008 (November): 1234--7. doi:10.1126/science.1195996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rask, K., 2010, Attrition in STEM fields at a liberal arts college: The importance of grades and pre-collegiate preferences, Economics of Education Review, 29, 892.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Strecher, Victor J, Saul Shiffman, and Robert West. 2005. Randomized controlled trial of a web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy. Addiction. 100, no. 5 (May): 682--8. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01093.x. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15847626.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Wilson, Z., et al., 2011, Hierarchical Mentoring, A Transformative Strategy for Improving Diversity and Retention in Undergraduate STEM Disciplines, Journal of Science Education Technology, DOI 10.1007/s10956-011-9292-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. What to do with actionable intelligence: E2Coach as an intervention engine

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      LAK '12: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge
      April 2012
      282 pages
      ISBN:9781450311113
      DOI:10.1145/2330601

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 April 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader