skip to main content
10.1145/2330601.2330630acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring reflection in online communities

Published:29 April 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Commons-based Peer Production is the process by which internet communities create media and software artefacts. Learning is integral to the success of these communities as it encourages contribution on an individual level, helps to build and sustain commitment on a group level and provides a means for adaption at an organisational level. While some communities have established ways to support organisational learning -- through a forum or thread reserved for community discussion -- few have investigated how more in-depth visual and analytic interfaces could help formalise this process. In this paper, we explore how social network visualisation can be used to encourage reflection and thus support organisational learning in online communities. We make the following contributions: First, we describe Commons-Based Peer Production, in terms of a socio-technical learning system that includes individual, group and organisational learning. Second, we present a novel visualisation environment that embeds social network visualisation in an asynchronous collaborative architecture. Third, we present results from an evaluation and discuss the potential for visualisation to support the process of organisational reflection in online communities.

References

  1. Argyris, C. and Schon, D. A. Organisational Learning: A Theory of Action Persepctive. Addison Wesley, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Benkler, Y. Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm. The Yale Law journal 112, (2002), 369.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bontis, N., Crossan, M. M., and Hulland, J. Managing An Organizational Learning System By Aligning Stocks and Flows. Journal of Management Studies 39, 4 (2002), 437--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Butler, B., Joyce, E., and Pike, J. Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia. Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2008), 1101--1110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., and White, R. E. An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution. Academy of management review 24, 3 (1999), 522--537.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Douglas Thomas, J. S. B. A New Culture of Learning: Cultivating the Imagination for a World of Constant Change. CreateSpace, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisher, D. and Dourish, P. Social and temporal structures in everyday collaboration. Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '04, (2004), 551--558. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Forte, A. and Bruckman, A. Scaling Consensus: Increasing Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance Andrea Forte and Amy Bruckman. Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE Computer Society (2008), 15--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ghoniem, M., Fekete, J.-D., and Castagliola, P. A Comparison of the Readability of Graphs Using Node-Link and Matrix-Based Representations. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ham, F. Van, Schulz, H.-jörg, and Dimicco, J. M. Honeycomb: Visual Analysis of Large Scale Social Networks. Ifip International Federation For Information Processing, (2009), 429--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Haythornthwaite, C. Crowds and Communities: Light and Heavyweight Models of Peer Production. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Heer, J. and Agrawala, M. Design considerations for collaborative visual analytics. Information Visualization 7, 1 (2008), 49--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Heer, J. and Boyd, D. Vizster: visualizing online social networks. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005., (2005), 32--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Heer, J. and Hellerstein, J. Data Visualization and Social Data Analysis. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, (2009), 1656--1657. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Heer, J., Viégas, F., and Wattenberg, M. Voyagers and voyeurs: Supporting asynchronous collaborative visualization. Communications of the ACM, April (2009), 87--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Henry, N. and Fekete, J.-D. MatrixExplorer: a dual-representation system to explore social networks. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 12, 5 (2006), 677--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jahnke, I. Socio-technical communities: From informal to formal? In B. Whitworth and A. D. Moor, eds., Handbook of Research on SocioTechnical Design and Social Networking. 2009, 763--777.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, D. The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Managemnet Review 33, 1 (1996), 37--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Levitt, B. and March, J. G. Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14, 1 (1988), 319--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Perer, A. and Shneiderman, B. Integrating statistics and visualization. Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '08, (2008), 265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Schindler, M. and Vrandecic, D. Introducing new features to Wikipedia: Case studies for Web Science. Proceedings of the WebSci'09: Society On-Line, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Viegas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., Ham, F. van, Kriss, J., and McKeon, M. ManyEyes: a site for visualization at internet scale. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 13, 6 (2007), 1121--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Viégas, F. B. and Smith, M. Newsgroup Crowds and AuthorLines: Visualizing the Activity of Individuals in Conversational Cyberspaces. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Viégas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., and Dave, K. Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Weber, S. What is Open Source and why does it work? In The success of Open Source. Harvard University Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Wenger, E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press; New Ed edition, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhu, B. and Chen, H. Communication-Garden System: Visualizing a computer-mediated communication process. Decision Support Systems 45, 4 (2008), 778--794. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring reflection in online communities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      LAK '12: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge
      April 2012
      282 pages
      ISBN:9781450311113
      DOI:10.1145/2330601

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 April 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader