skip to main content
research-article

Assistive tagging: A survey of multimedia tagging with human-computer joint exploration

Published: 07 September 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Along with the explosive growth of multimedia data, automatic multimedia tagging has attracted great interest of various research communities, such as computer vision, multimedia, and information retrieval. However, despite the great progress achieved in the past two decades, automatic tagging technologies still can hardly achieve satisfactory performance on real-world multimedia data that vary widely in genre, quality, and content. Meanwhile, the power of human intelligence has been fully demonstrated in the Web 2.0 era. If well motivated, Internet users are able to tag a large amount of multimedia data. Therefore, a set of new techniques has been developed by combining humans and computers for more accurate and efficient multimedia tagging, such as batch tagging, active tagging, tag recommendation, and tag refinement. These techniques are able to accomplish multimedia tagging by jointly exploring humans and computers in different ways. This article refers to them collectively as assistive tagging and conducts a comprehensive survey of existing research efforts on this theme. We first introduce the status of automatic tagging and manual tagging and then state why assistive tagging can be a good solution. We categorize existing assistive tagging techniques into three paradigms: (1) tagging with data selection & organization; (2) tag recommendation; and (3) tag processing. We introduce the research efforts on each paradigm and summarize the methodologies. We also provide a discussion on several future trends in this research direction.

References

[1]
Abbasi, R., Grzegorzek, M., and Staab, S. 2009. Tagez: Flickr tag recommendation. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Semantics and Digital Media Technologies.
[2]
Amir, A., Argillander, J., Campbell, M., Haubold, A., Iyengar, G., Ebadollahi, S., Kang, F., Naphade, M. R., Natsev, A., Smith, J. R., Tesic, J., and Volkmer, T. 2005. IBM research TRECVID-2005 video retrieval system. In Proceedings of the TRECVID Workshop.
[3]
Anderson, A., Ranghunathan, K., and Vogel, A. 2008. Tagez: Flickr tag recommendation. In Proceeding of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).
[4]
Ayache, S. and Quénot, G. 2007. Evaluation of active learning strategies for video indexing. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing.
[5]
Ballan, L., Bertini, M., and Bimbo, A. D. 2010. Tag suggestion and localization in user-generated videos based on social knowledge. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Social Media.
[6]
Beitzel, S. M., Jensen, E. C., Frieder, O., Chowdhury, A., and Pass, G. 2005. Surrogate scoring for improved metasearch precision. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development on Information Retrieval.
[7]
Blei, D. and Jordan, M. 2003. Modeling annotated data. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development on Information Retrieval.
[8]
Cao, J., Zhang, Y., Song, Y., Chen, Z., Zhang, X., and Li, J. 2009. Mcg-webv: A benchmark dataset for Web video analysis. Tech. rep. ICT-MCG-09-001, Institute of Computing Technology.
[9]
Chen, H. C., Chang, M. C., Chang, P. C., Tien, M. C., Hsu, W. H., and Wu, J. C. 2008. Sheepdog c group and tag recommendation for flickr photos by automatic search-based learning. In Proceeding of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[10]
Chen, L., Xu, D., Tsang, I. W., and Luo, J. 2010. Tag-based Web photo retrieval improved by batch mode re-tagging. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[11]
Chen, Z., Cao, J., Song, Y., Guo, J., Zhang, Y., and Li, J. 2010. Context-oriented Web video tag recommendation. In Proceeding of the International World Wide Web Conference.
[12]
Chua, T. S., Tang, J., Hong, R., Li, H., Luo, Z., and Zheng, Y. T. 2009. Nus-wide: A real-world Web image database from national university of singapore. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval.
[13]
Cui, J., Wen, F., Xiao, R., Tian, Y., and Tang, X. 2007. Easyalbum: An interactive photo annotation system based on face clustering and re-ranking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[14]
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., and Fei-Fei, L. 2009. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[15]
Duygulu, P., Barnard, K., de Freitas, J., and Forsyth, D. 2002. Object recognition as machine translation: Learning a lexicon for a fixed image vocabulary. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision.
[16]
Everingham, M. 2010. Overview and results of the classification challenge. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge Workshop.
[17]
Everingham, M., Gool, L. V., Williams, C. K. I., Win, J., and Zisserman, A. 2010. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. Int. J. Comput. Vision 88, 2.
[18]
Fan, J., Shen, Y., Zhou, N., and Gao, Y. 2010. Harvesting large-scale weakly-tagged image databases from the Web. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[19]
Fei-Fei, L., Fergus, R., and Perona, P. 2006. One-shot learning of object categories. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 28, 4.
[20]
Feng, S., Lang, C., and Xu, D. 2010. Beyond tag relevance: Integrating visual attention model and multi-instance learning for tag saliency ranking. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval.
[21]
Feng, S. L., Manmatha, R., and Lavrenko, V. 2004. Multiple Bernoulli relevance models for image and video annotation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[22]
Freund, Y., Iyer, R., Schapire, R. E., and Singer, Y. 1998. An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Machine Learning.
[23]
Gao, Y. and Fan, J. 2006. Incorporating concept ontology to enable probabilistic concept reasoning for multi-level image annotation. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval.
[24]
Garg, N. and Weber, I. 2008. Personalized, interactive tag recommendation for Flickr. In Proceeding of the ACM International Conference on Recommender Systems.
[25]
Goh, K. S., Chang, E. Y., and Lai, W. C. 2004. Multimodal concept-dependent active learning for image retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[26]
Griffin, G., Holub, A., and Perona, P. 2007. Caltech-256 object category dataset. Tech. rep. 7694, California Institute of Technology.
[27]
Hauptmann, A., Lin, W. H., Yan, R., Yang, J., and Chen, M. 2006. Extreme video retrieval: Joint maximization of human and computer performance. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[28]
Hauptmann, A., Yan, R., and Lin, W. C. 2007. How many high-level concepts will fill the semantic gap in video retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval.
[29]
Ho, C., Chang, T., Lee, J., Hsu, J. Y., and Chen, K. 2009. Kisskissban: A competitive human computation game for image annotation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation.
[30]
Huang, T. S., Dagli, C. K., Rajaram, S., Chang, E. Y., Mandel, M. I., Poliner, G. E., and Ellis, D. P. W. 2008. Active learning for interactive multimedia retrieval. Proc. IEEE 96, 4.
[31]
Huiskes, M. J. and Lew, M. S. 2008. The mir Flickr retrieval evaluation. In Proceeding of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval.
[32]
Huiskes, M. J., Thomee, B., and Lew, M. S. 2010. New trends and ideas in visual concept detection. In Proceeding of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval.
[33]
Jeon, J., Lavrenko, V., and Manmatha, R. 2003. Automatic image annotation and retrieval using cross media relevance models. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development on Information Retrieval.
[34]
Jesus, R., Goncalves, D., Abrantes, A., and Corriea, N. 2008. Playing games as a way to improve automatic image annotation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.
[35]
Jiang, Y. C., Yang, J., Ngo, C. C., Hauptmann, A. G., and Sukthankar, R. 2010. Representations of keypoint-based semantic concept detection: A comprehensive study,. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 12, 1.
[36]
Kennedy, L. S., Chang, S. F., and Kozintsev, I. V. 2006. To search or to label? predicting the performance of search-based automatic image classifiers. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval.
[37]
Lavrenko, V., Manmatha, R., and Jeon, J. 2004. A model for learning the semantics of pictures. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
[38]
Lee, S., Neve, W. D., Plataniotis, K. N., and Ro, Y. M. 2010. MAP-based image tag recommendation using a visual folksonomy. Pattern Recog. Lett. 31.
[39]
Lew, M., Sebe, N., Djeraba, C., and Jain, R. 2006. Content-based multimedia information retrieval: State-of-the-art and challenges. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 2, 1.
[40]
Li, G., Wang, M., Zheng, Y. T., Zha, Z. J., Li, H., and Chua, T. S. 2011. Shottagger: Tag location for internet videos. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval.
[41]
Li, J. and Wang, J. 2008. Real-time computerized annotation of pictures. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 30, 6.
[42]
Li, X., Snoek, C. G., and Worring, M. 2009. Learning social tag relevance by neighbor voting. Pattern Recog. Lett. 11, 7.
[43]
Li, X., Snoek, C. G., and Worring, M. 2010. Unsupervised multi-feature tag relevance learning for social image retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval.
[44]
Lin, C., Tseng, B., and Smith, J. R. 2003. VideoAnnEx: IBM MPEG-7 annotation tool for multimedia indexing and concept learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia & Expo.
[45]
Liu, D., Hua, X. C., Wang, M., and Zhang, H. C. 2010. Image retagging. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[46]
Liu, D., Hua, X. S., Yang, L., Wang, M., and Zhang, H. J. 2008. Tag ranking. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference.
[47]
Liu, D., Hua, X. S., and Zhang, H. J. 2011. Content-based tag processing for internet social images. Multimedia Tools Appl.
[48]
Liu, D., Wang, M., Hua, X. C., and Zhang, H. C. 2010. Semi-automatic tagging of photo albums via exemplar selection and tag inference. IEEE Trans. Multimedia.
[49]
Liu, D., Yan, S., Rui, Y., and Zhang, H. J. 2010. Unified tag analysis with multi-edge graph. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[50]
Liu, X., Cheng, B., Yan, S., Tang, J., Chua, T. C., and Jin, H. 2009. Label to region by bi-layer sparsify priors. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[51]
Liu, X., Yan, S., Luo, J., Tang, J., Huang, Z., and Jin, H. 2010. Nonparametric label-to-region by search. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[52]
Loui, A. C., Luo, J., Chang, S.-F., Ellis, D., Jiang, W., Kennedy, L., Lee, K., and Yanagawa, A. 2007. Kodak's consumer video benchmark data set: Concept definition and annotation. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval.
[53]
Makadia, A., Pavlovic, V., and Kumar, S. 2008. A new baseline for image annotation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision.
[54]
Monay, F. and Gatica-Perez, D. 2003. On image auto-annotation with latent space models. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[55]
Mori, Y., Takahashi, H., and Oka, R. 1999. Image-to-word transformation based on dividing and vector quantizing images with words. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Multimedia Intelligent Storage and Retrieval Management.
[56]
Naaman, M. and Nair, R. 2008. Zonetag's collaborative tag suggestions: What is this person doing in my phone? IEEE Multimedia Mag. 15, 3.
[57]
Naphade, M. R. and Smith, J. R. 2004. On the detection of semantic concepts at TRECVID. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[58]
O'Reilly, T. 2007. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Commun. Strategies 1, 17--37.
[59]
Over, P., Awad, G., Fiscus, J., and Michel, M. 2010. TRECVID 2010 c goals, tasks, data, evaluation, mechanisms and metrics. In Proceedings of the TRECVID Workshop.
[60]
Qi, G., Hua, X. S., Rui, Y., Tang, J., Mei, T., and Zhang, H. J. 2007. Correlative multi-label video annotation. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[61]
Rae, A., Sigurbjörnsson, B., and van Zwol, R. 2010. Improving tag recommendation using social networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Adaptivity, Personalization and Fusion of Heterogeneous Information.
[62]
Rui, Y., Huang, T. S., and Chang, S. F. 1999. Image retrieval: Current techniques, promising directions, and open issues. J. Visual Commun. Image Rep. 10, 1.
[63]
Russell, B., Torralba, A., Murphy, K., and Freeman, W. T. 2007. Labelme: A database and Web-based tool for image annotation. Int. J. Comput. Vision.
[64]
Sande, K. E., Gevers, T., and Snoek, C. G. 2010. Evaluating color descriptors for object and scene recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 32, 9, 1582--1596.
[65]
Seneviratne, L. and Izquierdo, E. 2006. An interactive framework for image annotation through gaming. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval.
[66]
Settles, B., Craven, M., and Friedland, L. 2008. Active learning with real annotation costs. In Proceedings of the NIPS Workshop on Cost-Sensitive Learning.
[67]
Sevil, S. G., Kucuktunc, O., Duygulu, P., and Can, F. 2010. Automatic tag expansion using visual similarity for photo sharing websites. Multimedia Tools Appl. 49, 1.
[68]
Shen, Y. and Fan, J. 2010. Leveraging loosely-tagged images and inter-object correlations for tag recommendation. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[69]
Sigurbjörnsson, B. and Zwol, R. V. 2008. Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference.
[70]
Smeulders, A. W., Worring, M., Santini, S., Gupta, A., and Jain, R. 2000. Content based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22, 12.
[71]
Snoek, C. G. and Smeulders, A. W. 2010. Visual-concept search solved? IEEE Comput. 43, 6, 76--78.
[72]
Snoek, C. G. and Worring, M. 2009. Concept-based video retrieval. Found. Trends Inf. Retriev. 4, 2.
[73]
Sorokin, A. and Forsyth, D. 2008. Utility data annotation via Amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.
[74]
Steggink, J. and Snoek, C. G. 2011. Adding semantics to image region annotations with the name-it-game. Multimedia Syst.
[75]
Suh, B. and Bederson, B. B. 2004. Semi-automatic image annotation using event and torso identification. Tech. rep. HCIL-2004-15, Computer Science Department, University of Maryland.
[76]
Sun, A. and Bhowmick, S. S. 2010. Quantifying tag representativeness of visual content of social images. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[77]
Tang, J., Chen, Q., Yan, S., Chua, T. S., and Jain, R. 2010. One person labels one million images. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[78]
Tang, J., Hong, R., Yan, S., Chua, T. C., Qi, G. C., and Jain, R. 2011. Image annotation by knn-sparse graph-based label propagation over noisy-tagged Web images. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2, 2.
[79]
Tian, Y., Liu, W., Xiao, R., Wen, F., and Tang, X. 2007. A face annotation framework with partial clustering and interactive labeling. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[80]
Toderici, G., Aradhye, H., Pasca, M., Sbaiz, L., and Yagnik, J. 2010. Finding meaning on youtube: Tag recommendation and category discovery. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[81]
Torralba, A., Fergus, R., and Freeman, W. 2008. 80 million tiny images: A large dataset for non-parametric object and scene recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 30, 11, 1958--1970.
[82]
Ulges, A., Schulze, C., Keysers, D., and Breuel, T. M. 2008. Identifying relevant frames in weakly labeled videos for training concept detectors. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval.
[83]
van de Sande, K. E., Gevers, T., and Snoek, C. G. 2011. Empowering visual categorization with the gpu. IEEE Trans. Multimedia.
[84]
Volkmer, T., Smith, J. R., and Natsev, A. 2005. A Web-based system for collaborative annotation of large image and video collections. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[85]
von Ahn, L. and Dabbish, L. 2004. Labeling images with a computer game. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[86]
von Ahn, L., Liu, R., and Blum, M. 2006. Peekaboom: A game for locating objects in images. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[87]
Wang, C., Jing, F., Zhang, L., and Zhang, H.-J. 2006. Image annotation refinement using random walk with restarts. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[88]
Wang, C., Jing, F., Zhang, L., and Zhang, H.-J. 2007. Content-based image annotation refinement. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[89]
Wang, M. and Hua, X. C. 2011. Active learning in multimedia annotation and retrieval: A survey. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2, 2.
[90]
Wang, M., Hua, X. S., Hong, R., Tang, J., Qi, G. J., and Song, Y. 2009. Unified video annotation via multi-graph learning. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 19, 5.
[91]
Wang, M., Hua, X. S., Tang, J., and Hong, R. 2009. Beyond distance measurement: Constructing neighborhood similarity for video annotation. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 11, 3.
[92]
Wang, M., Yang, K., Hua, X. S., and Zhang, H. J. 2010. Towards relevant and diverse search of social images. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 12, 8.
[93]
Wang, X., Zhang, L., Liu, M., Li, Y., and Ma, W. C. 2010. ARISTA c image search to annotation on billions of Web photos. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[94]
Wang, X.-J., Zhang, L., Jing, F., and Ma, W.-Y. 2006. Annosearch: Image auto-annotation by search. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[95]
Wang, Z., Feng, J., Zhang, C., and Yan, S. 2010. Learning to rank tags. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval.
[96]
Weinberger, K., M.Slaney, and R.V.Zowl. 2008. Resolving tag ambiguity. In Proceeding of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[97]
Wu, F., Han, Y., Tian, Q., and Zhuang, Y. 2010. Multi-label boosting for image annotation by structural grouping sparsity. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[98]
Wu, F., Yuan, Y., and Zhuang, Y. 2010. Heterogeneous feature selection by group lasso with logistic regression. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[99]
Wu, L., Yang, L., Yu, N., and Hua, X. C. 2009. Learning to tag. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference.
[100]
Xu, H., Wang, J., Hua, X.-S., and Li, S. 2009. Tag refinement by regularized LDA. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[101]
Yan, R., Fleury, M. O., Merler, M., Natsev, A., and Smith, J. R. 2009. Large-scale multimedia semantic concept modeling using robust subspace bagging and mapreduce. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Large-Scale Multimedia Retrieval and Mining.
[102]
Yan, R., Natsev, A., and Campbell, M. 2009. Hybrid tagging and browsing approaches for efficient manual image annotation. IEEE Multimedia Mag. 16, 2.
[103]
Yang, K., Hua, X.-S., Wang, M., and Zhang, H. C. 2010. Tagging tags. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.
[104]
Yang, K., Wang, M., Hua, X. S., and Zhang, H. J. 2009. Active tagging for image indexing. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Internet Multimedia Search and Mining.
[105]
Zhu, G., Yan, S., and Ma, Y. 2010. Image tag refinement towards low-rank, content-tag prior and error sparsity. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Case Study on the Design and Use of an Annotation and Analytical Tool Tailored To Lead ClimbingExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3573876(1-8)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)User Preference and Performance using Tagging and Browsing for Image LabelingProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580926(1-13)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)A survey on social image semantic analysisChinese Science Bulletin10.1360/TB-2022-093868:25(3368-3384)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Assistive tagging: A survey of multimedia tagging with human-computer joint exploration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Computing Surveys
    ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 44, Issue 4
    August 2012
    318 pages
    ISSN:0360-0300
    EISSN:1557-7341
    DOI:10.1145/2333112
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 September 2012
    Accepted: 01 April 2011
    Revised: 01 March 2011
    Received: 01 January 2011
    Published in CSUR Volume 44, Issue 4

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Annotation
    2. interactive tagging
    3. tag location
    4. tag recommendation
    5. tag refinement
    6. tagging

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)52
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)A Case Study on the Design and Use of an Annotation and Analytical Tool Tailored To Lead ClimbingExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3573876(1-8)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)User Preference and Performance using Tagging and Browsing for Image LabelingProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580926(1-13)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2022)A survey on social image semantic analysisChinese Science Bulletin10.1360/TB-2022-093868:25(3368-3384)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Socio-Economic Diversity in Human AnnotationsProceedings of the 14th ACM Web Science Conference 202210.1145/3501247.3531588(98-109)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2022
    • (2021)A Topic-Sensitive Method for Mashup Tag Recommendation Utilizing Multi-Relational Service DataIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2018.280582614:2(342-355)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
    • (2021)Inter-Brain EEG Feature Extraction and Analysis for Continuous Implicit Emotion Tagging During Video WatchingIEEE Transactions on Affective Computing10.1109/TAFFC.2018.284975812:1(92-102)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
    • (2020)Big Data ProcessingApplications and Approaches to Object-Oriented Software Design10.4018/978-1-7998-2142-7.ch005(111-132)Online publication date: 2020
    • (2020)Image Fusion Method Based on NSCT and Adaptive Sparse RepresentationProceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Video and Image Processing10.1145/3447450.3447461(68-74)Online publication date: 25-Dec-2020
    • (2020)Missing Low-Rank and Sparse Decomposition Based on Smoothed Nuclear NormIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology10.1109/TCSVT.2019.290746730:6(1550-1558)Online publication date: Jun-2020
    • (2020)A Knowledge Graph Approach to Mashup Tag Recommendation2020 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC)10.1109/SCC49832.2020.00021(92-99)Online publication date: Nov-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media