skip to main content
10.1145/2338676.2338679acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improvements in visually directed walking in virtual environments cannot be explained by changes in gait alone

Published:03 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

A previous study indicated that peripheral visual information strongly affects the judgment of egocentric distances for users of immersive virtual environments. The experiment described in this document aimed to investigate if these effects could be explained in terms of changes in gait caused by visual information in the extreme periphery. Three conditions with varying degrees of peripheral occlusion were tested and participants' walking characteristics measured. The results indicate that the improvements in distance judgments, as peripheral information increases, can only partially be explained in terms of gait modification, but likely involve both changes in the characteristics of gait and other spatial or movement parameters.

References

  1. Creem-Regehr, S. H., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A, and Thompson, W. B. 2005. The Influence of Restricted Viewing Conditions on Egocentric Distance Perception: Implications For Real and Virtual Indoor Environments. Perception, 34, 2, 191--204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Interrante, V., Anderson, L., and Ries, B. 2006. Distance Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments, Revisited. IEEE Virtual Reality 2006, 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jones, J. A., Swan II, J. E., Singh, G., and Ellis, S. R. 2011. Peripheral Visual Information and Its Effect on Distance Judgments in Virtual and Augmented Environments. Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 29--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jones, J. A., Swan II, J. E., Singh, G., Kolstad, E., and Ellis, S. R. 2008. The Effects of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Motion Parallax on Egocentric Depth Perception. Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 9--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hausdorff, J. M. 2007. Gait Dynamics, Fractals and Falls: Finding Meaning in The Stride-to-Stride Fluctuations of Human Walking. Human Movement Science. 26, 4, 555--589.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Knapp, J. M. 1999. The Visual Perception of Egocentric Distance in Virtual Environments. PhD thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Psychology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Loomis, J. M., and Knapp, J. M. 2003. Visual Perception of Egocentric Distance in Real and Virtual Environments, Virtual and Adaptive Environments: Applications, Implications, and Human Performance, 21--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mohler, B. J., Campos, J. L., Weyel, M. B., Bülthoff, H. H. 2007. Gait Parameters While Walking in a Head-Mounted Display Virtual Environment and The Real World. 13th Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments and 10th Immersive Projection Technology Workshop, 85--88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Philbeck, J. W., Woods, A. J., Arthur, J., and Todd, J. 2008. Progressive Locomotor Recalibration During Blind Walking. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 8, 1459--1470.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Phillips, L., Interrante, V., Kaeding, M., Ries, B. and Anderson, L. 2010. A Further Assessment of Factors Correlating with Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments. Joint Virtual Reality Conference of Euro VR, 55--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Richardson, A. R., and Waller, D. 2007. Interaction with an Immersive Virtual Environment Corrects Users' Distance Estimates. Human Factors, 49, 3, 507--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Rieser, J. J., Pick, H. L., Jr., Ashmead, D. A., and Garing, A. E. 1995. The Calibration of Human Locomotion and Models of Perceptual-motor Organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 480--497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Rubino. F. A. 2002. Gait Disorders. The Neurologist. 8, 254--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Singh, G., Swan II, J. E., Jones, J. A., Ellis, S. R. 2010. Depth Judgment Measures and Occluding Surfaces in Near-Field Augmented Reality. Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 149--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Souman, J. L., Giordano, P. R., Schwaiger, M., Frissen, I., Thümmel, T., Ulbrich, H., De Luca, A., Bülthoff, H. H., Ernst, M. O. 2011. CyberWalk: Enabling Unconstrained Omnidirectional Walking through Virtual Environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 8, 4, 1--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Swan II, J. E., Livingston, M. A., Smallman, H. S., Brown, D., Baillot, Y., Gabbard, J. L., and Hix, D. 2006. A Perceptual Matching Technique for Depth Judgments in Optical, See-through Augmented Reality. IEEE Virtual Reality 2006, 19--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Swan II, J. E., Jones, A., Kolstad, E., Livingston, M. A., and Smallman, H. S. 2007. Egocentric Depth Judgments in Optical, See-through Augmented Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13, 3, 429--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Thompson, W. B., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Loomis, J. M., and Beall, A. C. 2004. Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter When Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments?, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 13, 5, 560--571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Whittle, M. W. Gait Analysis: An Introduction. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Willemsen, P., and Gooch, A. A. 2002. Perceived Egocentric Distances in Real, Image-based, and Traditional Virtual Environments. IEEE Virtual Reality 2002, 275--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Willemsen, P., Colton, M. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., and Thompson, W. B. 2004. The Effects of Head-Mounted Display Mechanics on Distance Judgments in Virtual Environments. Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, vol. 73 of ACM International Conference Proceedings Series, ACM, 35--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Willemsen, P., Colton, M. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., and Thompson, W. B. 2009. The Effects of Head-Mounted Display Mechanical Properties and Field of View on Distance Judgments in Virtual Environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 6, 2, 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Witmer, B. G., and Sadowski, W. 1998. Nonvisually Guided Locomotion to a Previously Viewed Target in Real and Virtual Environments, Human Factors, 40, 3, 478--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Wu, B., Ooi, T. L., and He, Z. J. 2004. Perceiving Distance Accurately by a Directional Process of Integrating Ground Information, Nature, 428 (Mar.), 73--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Improvements in visually directed walking in virtual environments cannot be explained by changes in gait alone

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SAP '12: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception
              August 2012
              131 pages
              ISBN:9781450314312
              DOI:10.1145/2338676

              Copyright © 2012 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 3 August 2012

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              SAP '12 Paper Acceptance Rate21of40submissions,53%Overall Acceptance Rate43of94submissions,46%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader