skip to main content
10.1145/2339530.2339645acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Parallel field ranking

Published: 12 August 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Recently, ranking data with respect to the intrinsic geometric structure (manifold ranking) has received considerable attentions, with encouraging performance in many applications in pattern recognition, information retrieval and recommendation systems. Most of the existing manifold ranking methods focus on learning a ranking function that varies smoothly along the data manifold. However, beyond smoothness, a desirable ranking function should vary monotonically along the geodesics of the data manifold, such that the ranking order along the geodesics is preserved. In this paper, we aim to learn a ranking function that varies linearly and therefore monotonically along the geodesics of the data manifold. Recent theoretical work shows that the gradient field of a linear function on the manifold has to be a parallel vector field. Therefore, we propose a novel ranking algorithm on the data manifolds, called Parallel Field Ranking. Specifically, we try to learn a ranking function and a vector field simultaneously. We require the vector field to be close to the gradient field of the ranking function, and the vector field to be as parallel as possible. Moreover, we require the value of the ranking function at the query point to be the highest, and then decrease linearly along the manifold. Experimental results on both synthetic data and real data demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithm.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (311b_t_talk_1.jpg)
MP4 File (311b_t_talk_1.mp4)

References

[1]
S. Agarwal. Ranking on graph data. In ICML, pages 25--32, 2006.
[2]
M. Belkin and P. Niyogi. Laplacian eigenmaps and spectral techniques for embedding and clustering. In NIPS 14, pages 585--591. 2001.
[3]
J. Canny. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 8(6):679--698, 1986.
[4]
C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines, 2001. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm.
[5]
F. R. K. Chung. Spectral Graph Theory, volume 92 of Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. AMS, 1997.
[6]
B. Gao, T.-Y. Liu, W. Wei, T. Wang, and H. Li. Semi-supervised ranking on very large graphs with rich metadata. In KDD, pages 96--104, 2011.
[7]
G. H. Golub and C. F. V. Loan. Matrix computations. Johns Hopkins University Press, 3rd edition, 1996.
[8]
Z. Guan, J. Bu, Q. Mei, C. Chen, and C. Wang. Personalized tag recommendation using graph-based ranking on multi-type interrelated objects. In SIGIR, pages 540--547, 2009.
[9]
J. He, M. Li, H.-J. Zhang, H. Tong, and C. Zhang. Manifold-ranking based image retrieval. In ACM Multimedia, New York, October 2004.
[10]
J. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46(5):604--622, 1999.
[11]
M. Lades, J. C. Vorbrüggen, J. M. Buhmann, J. Lange, C. von der Malsburg, R. P. Würtz, and W. Konen. Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 42(3):300--311, 1993.
[12]
J. Lafferty and L. Wasserman. Statistical analysis of semi-supervised regression. In NIPS 20, pages 801--808, 2007.
[13]
B. Lin, C. Zhang, and X. He. Semi-supervised regression via parallel field regularization. In NIPS 24, pages 433--441. 2011.
[14]
D. Liu, X.-S. Hua, L. Yang, M. Wang, and H.-J. Zhang. Tag ranking. In WWW, pages 351--360, 2009.
[15]
C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schtze. Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[16]
T. Ojala, M. Pietikäinen, and D. Harwood. A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions. Pattern Recognition, 29(1):51--59, 1996.
[17]
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford University, 1998.
[18]
P. Petersen. Riemannian Geometry. Springer, 1998.
[19]
S. Roweis and L. Saul. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science, 290(5500):2323--2326, 2000.
[20]
T. Sim, S. Baker, and M. Bsat. The cmu pose, illumination, and expression database. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(12):1615--1618, 2003.
[21]
D. Tao, X. Li, X. Wu, and S. J. Maybank. Geometric mean for subspace selection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31(2):260--274, 2009.
[22]
D. Tao, X. Tang, X. Li, and Y. Rui. Direct kernel biased discriminant analysis: A new content-based image retrieval relevance feedback algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 8(4):716--727, 2006.
[23]
J. Tenenbaum, V. de Silva, and J. Langford. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290(5500):2319--2323, 2000.
[24]
S. Tong and E. Y. Chang. Support vector machine active learning for image retrieval. In ACM Multimedia, pages 107--118, 2001.
[25]
X. Wan, J. Yang, and J. Xiao. Manifold-ranking based topic-focused multi-document summarization. In IJCAI, pages 2903--2908, 2007.
[26]
B. Xu, J. Bu, C. Chen, D. Cai, X. He, W. Liu, and J. Luo. Efficient manifold ranking for image retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 525--534, 2011.
[27]
X. Yuan, X.-S. Hua, M. Wang, and X. Wu. Manifold-ranking based video concept detection on large database and feature pool. In ACM Multimedia, pages 623--626, 2006.
[28]
D. Zhou, J. Weston, A. Gretton, O. Bousquet, and B. Schölkopf. Ranking on data manifolds. In NIPS 16, 2003.
[29]
X. Zhou, M. Belkin, and N. Srebro. An iterated graph laplacian approach for ranking on manifolds. In KDD, pages 877--885, 2011.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
KDD '12: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
August 2012
1616 pages
ISBN:9781450314626
DOI:10.1145/2339530
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 August 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. manifold
  2. ranking
  3. vector field

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

KDD '12
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

Upcoming Conference

KDD '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media