skip to main content
10.1145/2339530.2339729acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Incorporating heterogeneous information for personalized tag recommendation in social tagging systems

Published:12 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

A social tagging system provides users an effective way to collaboratively annotate and organize items with their own tags. A social tagging system contains heterogeneous information like users' tagging behaviors, social networks, tag semantics and item profiles. All the heterogeneous information helps alleviate the cold start problem due to data sparsity. In this paper, we model a social tagging system as a multi-type graph. To learn the weights of different types of nodes and edges, we propose an optimization framework, called OptRank. OptRank can be characterized as follows:(1) Edges and nodes are represented by features. Different types of edges and nodes have different set of features. (2) OptRank learns the best feature weights by maximizing the average AUC (Area Under the ROC Curve) of the tag recommender. We conducted experiments on two publicly available datasets, i.e., Delicious and Last.fm. Experimental results show that: (1) OptRank outperforms the existing graph based methods when only (user, tag, item) relation is available. (2) OptRank successfully improves the results by incorporating social network, tag semantics and item profiles.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

311a_w_talk_2.mp4

mp4

392.7 MB

References

  1. L. Backstrom and J. Leskovec. Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks. In WSDM, pages 635--644, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. I. Cantador, P. Brusilovsky, and T. Kuflik. Workshop hetrec 2011. RecSys 2011. ACM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. B. Gao, T.-Y. Liu, W. Wei, T. Wang, and H. Li. Semi-supervised ranking on very large graphs with rich metadata. In KDD, pages 96--104, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Z. Guan, J. Bu, Q. Mei, C. Chen, and C. Wang. Personalized tag recommendation using graph-based ranking on multi-type interrelated objects. In SIGIR, pages 540--547, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Jäschke, L. B. Marinho, A. Hotho, L. Schmidt-Thieme, and G. Stumme. Tag recommendations in folksonomies. In PKDD, pages 506--514, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. I. Konstas, V. Stathopoulos, and J. M. Jose. On social networks and collaborative recommendation. In SIGIR, pages 195--202, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. Liang, Y. Xu, Y. Li, and R. Nayak. Personalized recommender system based on item taxonomy and folksonomy. CIKM '10, pages 1641--1644, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. Liang, Y. Xu, Y. Li, R. Nayak, and X. Tao. Connecting users and items with weighted tags for personalized item recommendations. HT '10, pages 51--60. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Ma, T. C. Zhou, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. Improving recommender systems by incorporating social contextual information. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 29:9:1--9:23, Apr. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Milne. An Open-Source Toolkit for Mining Wikipedia, volume 2889. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Peng, D. D. Zeng, H. Zhao, and F.-y. Wang. Collaborative filtering in social tagging systems based on joint item-tag recommendations. CIKM '10, pages 809--818. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Rendle, L. B. Marinho, A. Nanopoulos, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Learning optimal ranking with tensor factorization for tag recommendation. In KDD, pages 727--736, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Rendle and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Pairwise interaction tensor factorization for personalized tag recommendation. In WSDM, pages 81--90, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. B. Sigurbjörnsson and R. van Zwol. Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge. WWW '08, pages 327--336. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. Symeonidis, A. Nanopoulos, and Y. Manolopoulos. Tag recommendations based on tensor dimensionality reduction. In RecSys, pages 43--50, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. Symeonidis, A. Nanopoulos, and Y. Manolopoulos. A unified framework for providing recommendations in social tagging systems based on ternary semantic analysis. TKDE, 22(2):179--192, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H. Yildirim and M. S. Krishnamoorthy. A random walk method for alleviating the sparsity problem in collaborative filtering. In RecSys, pages 131--138, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Y. Zhen, W.-J. Li, and D.-Y. Yeung. Tagicofi: tag informed collaborative filtering. RecSys '09, pages 69--76. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Incorporating heterogeneous information for personalized tag recommendation in social tagging systems

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          KDD '12: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
          August 2012
          1616 pages
          ISBN:9781450314626
          DOI:10.1145/2339530

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 August 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

          Upcoming Conference

          KDD '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader