skip to main content
10.1145/2339530.2339731acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

RecMax: exploiting recommender systems for fun and profit

Published:12 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent times, collaborative filtering based Recommender Systems (RS) have become extremely popular. While research in recommender systems has mostly focused on improving the accuracy of recommendations, in this paper, we look at the "flip" side of a RS. That is, instead of improving existing recommender algorithms, we ask whether we can use an existing operational RS to launch a targeted marketing campaign. To this end, we propose a novel problem called RecMax that aims to select a set of "seed" users for a marketing campaign for a new product, such that if they endorse the product by providing relatively high ratings, the number of other users to whom the product is recommended by the underlying RS algorithm is maximum. We motivate RecMax with real world applications. We show that seeding can make a substantial difference, if done carefully. We prove that RecMax is not only NP-hard to solve optimally, it is NP-hard to even approximate within any reasonable factor. Given this hardness, we explore several natural heuristics on 3 real world datasets - Movielens, Yahoo! Music and Jester Joke and report our findings. We show that even though RecMax is hard to approximate, simple natural heuristics may provide impressive gains, for targeted marketing using RS.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

311a_w_talk_4.mp4

mp4

333.5 MB

References

  1. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng., 17, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. S. Anand and N. Griffiths. A market-based approach to address the new item problem. In RecSys, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Bhagat, A. Goyal, and L. V. S. Lakshmanan. Maximizing product adoption in social networks. In WSDM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. W. Chen, Y. Wang, and S. Yang. Efficient influence maximization in social networks. In KDD, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. Domingos and M. Richardson. Mining the network value of customers. In KDD, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. Y. Goldberg et al. Eigentaste: A constant time collaborative filtering algorithm. Inf. Retr., 4(2), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. D. Hartline et al. Optimal marketing strategies over social networks. In WWW, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Hastad. Clique is hard to approximate within n1∈. In FOCS, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. L. Herlocker et al. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In SIGIR, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Kempe, J. M. Kleinberg, and É. Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In KDD, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. X. N. Lam et al. Addressing cold-start problem in recommendation systems. In ICUIMC, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. B. Mobasher et al. Toward trustworthy recommender systems: An analysis of attack models and algorithm robustness. ACM Trans. Internet Techn., 7(4), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Rashid, G. Karypis, and J. Riedl. Influence in ratings-based recommender systems: An algorithm-independent approach. In SDM, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P. B. Kantor, editors. Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Reidl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In WWW, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. G. Takács et al. Matrix factorization and neighbor based algorithms for the netflix prize problem. In RecSys, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Wang, A. P. de Vries, and M. J. T. Reinders. Unifying user-based and item-based collaborative filtering approaches by similarity fusion. In SIGIR, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. RecMax: exploiting recommender systems for fun and profit

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '12: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      August 2012
      1616 pages
      ISBN:9781450314626
      DOI:10.1145/2339530

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 August 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader