skip to main content
10.1145/2346536.2346593acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

(Hidden) social influences in switching mobile service platforms

Published:07 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

During the past few years, the mobile industry has gone through a radical change from business focusing on excellence in device manufacturing and supply chain management to ecosystems around successful focal players, such as Apple and Google, controlling these service platforms. In order to compete in this environment, these firms need to understand what makes a consumer switch between these mobile service platforms. To that end, we conducted an inductive qualitative study with university students from Finland and USA as subjects (142 altogether), delving into how and why consumers switch mobile phones, and what are the factors affecting their decisions. Our results indicate that tacit, or hidden, social influences are emerging as important factors that are intertwined with both same- and cross-side network effects in the mobile service ecosystems.

References

  1. Horan, T., Big Screen, little screen. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. The OECD Observer, 2008. July 2008(286): p. 22--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Clarke, I. and J. Madison, Emerging Value Proposition for M-Commerce. Journal of Business Strategies, 2001. 18(2): p. 133--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mahatanankoon, P., J. H. Wen, and B. Lim, Consumer-Based M-Commerce: Exploring Consumer Perception of Mobile Applications. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 2004. 27: p. 347--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ballon, P. and R. Hawkins, Standardization and Business models for Platform Competition: The Case of Mobile Television. International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research, 2008. 7(1): p. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Tuunanen, T., M. Myers, and H. Cassab, A Conceptual Framework for Consumer Information Systems Development. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2010. 2(1): p. 5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lamb, R. Alternative Paths Toward a Social Actor Concept. in the Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems. 2006. Acapulco: Association for Information Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lamb, R. and R. Kling, Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 2003. 27(2): p. 197--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Parker, G. G. and M. W. Van Alstyne, Two-sided network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design. Management Science, 2005. 51(10): p. 1494--1504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Rochet, J.-C. and J. Tirole, Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2003. 1(4): p. 990--1029.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Economides, N. and E. Katsamakas, Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry. Management Science, 2006. 52(7): p. 1057--1071. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Eisenmann, T., G. Parker, and M. W. Van Alstyne, Strategies for Two-Sided Markets. Harvard Business Review, 2006(October): p. 92--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Taudes, A., M. Feurstein, and A. Mild, Options analysis of software platform decisions: A case study. MIS Quartely, 2000. 24(2): p. 227--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Tuunainen, V., T. Tuunanen, and M. Bastek. A Model for ICT Intensive Service Innovations in two-sided markets -- Case Study of IPTV in a National TV Broadcasting Company. in 2009 International Conference on New Trends in Information and Service Science (NISS2009). 2009. Beijing, China: IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Tuunainen, V. and T. Tuunanen. IISIn - A model for analyzing ICT Intensive Service Innovations in n-sided Markets. in the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). 2011. Kauai, Hawaii: IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts, Economics, Organization and Management. 1992, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Katz, M. L. and C. Shapiro, Systems Competition and Network Effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994. 8(2): p. 93--115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Klemperer, P., Markets with consumer switching costs. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987. 102(2): p. 375--394.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuentelsaz, L., J. P. Maicas, and Y. Polo, Switching Costs, Network Effects, and Competition in the European Mobile Telecommunications Industry. Information Systems Research, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Farrell, J. and P. Klemperer, Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. Handbook of industrial organization, 2007. 3: p. 1967--2072.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu, J., J. E. Yao, and C. S. Yu, Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2005. 14(3): p. 245--268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. 1995, New York: The Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. von Hippel, E., Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts. Management Science, 1986. 32(7): p. 791--805. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sarker, S. and J. D. Wells, Understanding mobile handheld device use and adoption. Communications of the ACM, 2003. 46(12): p. 35--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. 1975: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Schepers, J. and M. Wetzels, A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 2007. 44(1): p. 90--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Venkatesh, V., et al., User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 2003. 27(3): p. 425--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Davis, F. D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 1989. 13(3): p. 319--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. (Hidden) social influences in switching mobile service platforms

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEC '12: Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce
      August 2012
      357 pages
      ISBN:9781450311977
      DOI:10.1145/2346536

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 August 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate150of244submissions,61%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader