skip to main content
10.1145/2347504.2347508acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdppiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design for sustainable consumption behaviour: systematising the use of behavioural intervention strategies

Published:22 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

It has been well debated if user centred design, UCD, can actually lead to innovation. This paper discusses the case of sustainable innovation, specifically addressing the development of solutions to influence users' resource consumption behaviour. The approach presented, suggests how knowledge on user actions and habits in a resource consumption situation can be used in the product development process in combination with systematised behavioural intervention strategies to facilitate the creation of innovative solutions aiming to motivate resource efficient everyday actions.

The Design for Sustainable Consumption Behaviour-approach, defined through a combination of UCD-methodology, studies of user consumption behaviour and categorised behavioural intervention strategies, explores how systematised knowledge within the domains can be applicable in an industry context to stimulate innovative solutions supporting actions for a decreased consumption of resources. The DSCB-approach can be regarded as an exploratory tool, which has the potential to help companies to integrate a behavioural perspective within their existing product development processes by providing guidance and an overview of available intervention strategies. To illustrate the use of the approach and conduct a first evaluation of the applicability, this paper reports on an explanatory case study carried out at IKEA of Sweden. The innovative results and outcomes of the case study suggest that the approach has potential to bring forth sustainable innovations. However, the presented approach should be developed further and tested through additional research before further conclusions can be drawn.

References

  1. Abrahamse, W. et al. 2007. The effect of tailored information, goal-setting and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 27, No. 4, 265--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Berry, M. A. and Rondinelli, D. A. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental management: a new industrial revolution. Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 12, No. 2, 38--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cialdini, R. 2007. Influence: the psychology of persuasion. Rev ed. New York: HarperBusiness.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Darby, S. 2000. Making it obvious: designing feedback into energy consumption. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Lighting. Italian Association of Energy Economists/EC-SAVE programme.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Designing-in sustainable behavior: a nudge in the right direction (2008) Strategic Direction, 24, (11), 30--32. DOI=http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1747902&show=abstractGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dwyer, W. et al. 1993. Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment: Research since 1980. Environment and Behavior. Vol. 25, No. 3, 275--321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Flach, J. M. and Dominquez, E. O. 1995. Use-centered design: Integrating the user, instrument, and goal. Ergonomics in Design. Vol. 3, No. 3, 19--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Flyvbjerg, B. 2004. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In Qualitative Research Practice. 2004 Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. F., and Silverman, D. Eds. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 420--434.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fogg, B. J. Creating Persuasive Technologies: An Eight-Step Design Process. Retrieved 2011-02-04 from: http://bjfogg.com/design_files/page8_1.pdf. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fogg, B. J. 2003. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gram-Hanssen, K. 2007. Consuming technologies -- developing routines. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol 16, No. 11, 1181--1189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jelsma, J. and Knot, M. 2002. Designing environmentally efficient services; a 'script' approach. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design 2, 119--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lilley, D. 2009. Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions. Design Studies. Vol. 30, No. 6, 704--720. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.05.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lilley, D., Lofthouse, V., and Bhamra, T. 2005. Towards instinctive sustainable product use. Presented at: 2nd International Conference: Sustainability Creating the Culture, Aberdeen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lockton, D., Harrison, D., and Stanton, N. A. 2010. The Design with Intent Method: a design tool for influencing user behaviour. Applied Ergonomics. Vol. 41, No. 3, 382--392. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lockton, D., Harrison, D. J., and Stanton, 2008. Making the user more efficient: Design for sustainable behaviour. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. Vol.1 No. 1, 3--8. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19397030802131068Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Michalko, M. 1991. Thinkertoys-a handbook of creative-thinking ideas. Berkeley: Ten speed Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., and Rangaswami, M. R. 2009. Why Sustainability Is Now the Key Driver of Innovation. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 87, No. 9, 57--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Norman, D. A. 1988. The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Norman, D. A. and Draper, S. W. 1986. User-Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rodriguez, E., and Boks, C. 2005. How design of products affects user behaviour and vice versa: the environmental implications. In Ecodesign 2005: Fourth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Tang, T. and Bhamra, T. A. 2009. Understanding Consumer Behaviour to Reduce Environmental Impacts through Sustainable Product Design. In: Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference 2008, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK, 16--19 July 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Verganti, R. 2009. Design Driven Innovation -- Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating what Things Mean. Boston, MA: Harvard Business PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wever, R., van Kuijk, J., and Boks, C. 2008. User-centred design for sustainable behaviour. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. Vol. 1, No. 1, 9--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Design for sustainable consumption behaviour: systematising the use of behavioural intervention strategies

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        DPPI '11: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces
        June 2011
        492 pages
        ISBN:9781450312806
        DOI:10.1145/2347504

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 June 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate27of53submissions,51%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader