skip to main content
10.1145/2347504.2347548acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdppiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Soft systems networking in design thinking for a sustainable society

Published:22 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sustainability is a complex and dynamic term which can only be understood through the rigorous consideration of the ever-changing necessities of humankind and their resonance across the globe. The recognition of sustainability has faced dramatic alterations with new aspects in recent decades, various methodologies, tools, organizations, and initiatives emerged in order to catch the change and take steps toward a sustainable future. However, the world-wide pervasive environmental degradation and rising social equity problems reveal clearly that these efforts lack the sufficient power to stimulate the social, economic, and political commitment.

This study proposes a methodological tool for constructing a network which provides coordination and increased strength among the agents of sustainable development. With a focus on design-related research and education, academic institutions are suggested as the operators that host and catalyze the interaction between the various layers of producers and consumers. In other words, the main purpose of this study can be seen as the integration and collaboration of the academic, industrial, and user channels which perform innovative design responses as well as generating social conventions.

Embracing the mindset of Soft Systems Methods (SSMs), the paper establishes a theoretical structure adapted from the front-end innovation model 'New Concept Development (NCD)' and the societal repertoire of co-design.

References

  1. Alaca, E. F., 2010, A Management Theory for Art Education: Front-End Structure for Independent and Sustainable Progress, paper presented to the New Media Art Education & Research 3 Always Already New Symposium, 16--18 December, Milan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Assadourian, E., 2010, The Rise and Fall of Consumer Cultures, in Starke L. & Mastny L. (ed.), State of the World 2010: Transforming Cultures form Consumerism to Sustainability, Earthscan, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber, B. R., 2007, Consumed: How Markets Corrupt Children, Infantilize Adults, and Swallow Citizens Whole, Norton& Company, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Broadbent, J., 2007, Generations in Design Methodology, The Design Journal, 6/1, 2--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bürdek, E. B., 2010, Design & Art. The Ongoing Misunderstanding, Keynote Paper in Design and Craft: A History of Convergences and Divergences, 7th Conference of the International Committee of Design History and Design Studies (ICDHS), 20--22 September, Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Castells M. & Himanen P., The Information Society and the Welfare State: The Finnish Model, Oxford University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapman, J. & Gant, N., Introduction, in Chapman, J. & Gant, N. (ed.), Designers, Visionaries + Other Stories: A Collection of Sustainable Design Essays, Earthscan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapman, J., 2009, Design for (Emotional) Durability, Design Issues, 25/4, 29--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Checkland P. & Scholes J., 1990, Soft Systems Methodology in Action, John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dauvergne, P., 2010, The Problem of Consumption, Global Environmental Politics, 10/2, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Diller, S., Shedroff, N., and Rhea, D., 2008, Making Meaning: How Successful Businesses Deliver Meaningful Customer Experiences, New Riders, Berkeley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fuad-Luke, A., 2007, Redefining the Purposes of (Sustainable) Design: Enter the Design Enablers, Catalysts in Co-design, in Chapman, J. and Gant, N. (ed.), Designers, Visionaries + Other Stories: A Collection of Sustainable Design Essays, Earthscan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gabriel Y. & Lang T., 1995, The Unmanageable Consumer: Contemporary Consumption and its Fragmentation, Sage Publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gardner, G., Assadourian, E., and Sarin, R., 2004, The State of Consumption Today, in Starke L. (ed.), State of The World 2004, World Watch Institute, Washington.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Harker, R., 2010, A Greener Future, Newdesign, Issue 82, 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson, T., 2008, The Challenge of Sustainable Lifestyles, in Starke L. (ed.), State of The World 2008: Innovations for a Sustainable Economy, World Watch Institute, Washington.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kasser, T., 2002, The High Price of Materialism, MIT Press, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Koen et al., P., 2001, 'Providing Clarity and A Common Language to The "Fuzzy Front End" of Innovation', Research Technology Management, 44/2, 46--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Koen et al., P., 2002, 'Fuzzy Front End: Effective Methods, Tools, and Techniques' in P. Belliveau, A. Griffin, S. Somermeyer (ed.), The PDMA ToolBook for New Product Development, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 5--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Leonard, A., 2010, The Story of Stuff: How Our Obsession with Stuff Is Trashing The Planet, Our Communities, and Our Health, Constable& Robinson, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Manzini, E., 2006, Design for Sustainability: How to Design Sustainable Solutions, Politecnico di Milano, Milan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Manzini, E., 2006, Design, Ethics, and Sustainability: Guidelines for a Transition Phase, DIS Politecnico di Milano, Milan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Manzini, E., 2007, The Scenario of a Multi-local Society: Creative Communities, Active Networks and Enabling Solutions, in Chapman, J. & Gant, N. (ed.), Designers, Visionaries + Other Stories: A Collection of Sustainable Design Essays, Earthscan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. McDonough, W. & Braungart, M., 1992, The Hannover Principles: Design for Sustainability, in Lees-Maffei, G. and Houze, R. (ed.), The Design History Reader, 2010, Berg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Meadows D. H., 2008, Thinking in Systems: A Primer, Wright D. (ed.), Chelsea Green Publishing Company, Vermont.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mont, O. & Plepys, A., 2008, Sustainable Consumption on Progress: Should We Proud or Alarmed, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16/4, 531--537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Orr, D. W., 2002, The Nature of Design: Ecology, Culture, and Human Intention, Oxford University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Papanek, V., 1984, Design for The Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, Second ed., Thames and Hudson, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Pearce, F., 2010, People Quake: Mass Migration, Ageing Nations and The Coming Population Crash, Transworld Publishers, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Saito, Y., 2007, Everyday Aesthetics, Oxford University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Schor, J. B., 2004, Born to Buy: The Commercialized Child and The New Consumer Culture, Schribner, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. The World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Thorpe, A., 2010, Design's Role in Sustainable Consumption, Design Issues, 26/2, 3--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Tischner, U. et.al., 2000, How to Do EcoDesign: A Guide for Environmentally and Economically Sound Design, German Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Tomkinson, B., 2009, Coping with Complexity: The Ability to Manage Complex Sustainability Problems, in Stibbe A. (ed.), The Handbook of Sustainability Literacy: Skills for a Changing World, Green Books, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Wahl, D. C. & Baxter, S., 2008, The Designer's Role in Facilitating Sustainable Solutions, Design Issues 24/2, 72--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Walker, S., 2006, Object Lessons: Enduring Artifacts and Sustainable Solutions, Design Issues, 22/1, 20--31Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Walker, S., 2006, Sustainable in Design: Explorations in Theory and Practice, Earthscan, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Walker, S., 2010, Wrapped Attention: Designing Products for Evolving Permanence and Enduring Meaning, Design Issues, 26/4, 94--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Wood, J., 2007, Relative Abundance: Fuller's discovery that the Glass is Always Half Full, in Chapman, J. and Gant, N. (ed.), Designers, Visionaries + Other Stories: A Collection of Sustainable Design Essays, Earthscan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Soft systems networking in design thinking for a sustainable society

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      DPPI '11: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces
      June 2011
      492 pages
      ISBN:9781450312806
      DOI:10.1145/2347504

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 June 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate27of53submissions,51%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader