ABSTRACT
Sustainability is a complex and dynamic term which can only be understood through the rigorous consideration of the ever-changing necessities of humankind and their resonance across the globe. The recognition of sustainability has faced dramatic alterations with new aspects in recent decades, various methodologies, tools, organizations, and initiatives emerged in order to catch the change and take steps toward a sustainable future. However, the world-wide pervasive environmental degradation and rising social equity problems reveal clearly that these efforts lack the sufficient power to stimulate the social, economic, and political commitment.
This study proposes a methodological tool for constructing a network which provides coordination and increased strength among the agents of sustainable development. With a focus on design-related research and education, academic institutions are suggested as the operators that host and catalyze the interaction between the various layers of producers and consumers. In other words, the main purpose of this study can be seen as the integration and collaboration of the academic, industrial, and user channels which perform innovative design responses as well as generating social conventions.
Embracing the mindset of Soft Systems Methods (SSMs), the paper establishes a theoretical structure adapted from the front-end innovation model 'New Concept Development (NCD)' and the societal repertoire of co-design.
- Alaca, E. F., 2010, A Management Theory for Art Education: Front-End Structure for Independent and Sustainable Progress, paper presented to the New Media Art Education & Research 3 Always Already New Symposium, 16--18 December, Milan.Google Scholar
- Assadourian, E., 2010, The Rise and Fall of Consumer Cultures, in Starke L. & Mastny L. (ed.), State of the World 2010: Transforming Cultures form Consumerism to Sustainability, Earthscan, UK.Google Scholar
- Barber, B. R., 2007, Consumed: How Markets Corrupt Children, Infantilize Adults, and Swallow Citizens Whole, Norton& Company, London.Google Scholar
- Broadbent, J., 2007, Generations in Design Methodology, The Design Journal, 6/1, 2--13.Google Scholar
- Bürdek, E. B., 2010, Design & Art. The Ongoing Misunderstanding, Keynote Paper in Design and Craft: A History of Convergences and Divergences, 7th Conference of the International Committee of Design History and Design Studies (ICDHS), 20--22 September, Brussels.Google Scholar
- Castells M. & Himanen P., The Information Society and the Welfare State: The Finnish Model, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Chapman, J. & Gant, N., Introduction, in Chapman, J. & Gant, N. (ed.), Designers, Visionaries + Other Stories: A Collection of Sustainable Design Essays, Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Chapman, J., 2009, Design for (Emotional) Durability, Design Issues, 25/4, 29--35.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Checkland P. & Scholes J., 1990, Soft Systems Methodology in Action, John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dauvergne, P., 2010, The Problem of Consumption, Global Environmental Politics, 10/2, 1--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diller, S., Shedroff, N., and Rhea, D., 2008, Making Meaning: How Successful Businesses Deliver Meaningful Customer Experiences, New Riders, Berkeley. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fuad-Luke, A., 2007, Redefining the Purposes of (Sustainable) Design: Enter the Design Enablers, Catalysts in Co-design, in Chapman, J. and Gant, N. (ed.), Designers, Visionaries + Other Stories: A Collection of Sustainable Design Essays, Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Gabriel Y. & Lang T., 1995, The Unmanageable Consumer: Contemporary Consumption and its Fragmentation, Sage Publication.Google Scholar
- Gardner, G., Assadourian, E., and Sarin, R., 2004, The State of Consumption Today, in Starke L. (ed.), State of The World 2004, World Watch Institute, Washington.Google Scholar
- Harker, R., 2010, A Greener Future, Newdesign, Issue 82, 6.Google Scholar
- Jackson, T., 2008, The Challenge of Sustainable Lifestyles, in Starke L. (ed.), State of The World 2008: Innovations for a Sustainable Economy, World Watch Institute, Washington.Google Scholar
- Kasser, T., 2002, The High Price of Materialism, MIT Press, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Koen et al., P., 2001, 'Providing Clarity and A Common Language to The "Fuzzy Front End" of Innovation', Research Technology Management, 44/2, 46--55.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Koen et al., P., 2002, 'Fuzzy Front End: Effective Methods, Tools, and Techniques' in P. Belliveau, A. Griffin, S. Somermeyer (ed.), The PDMA ToolBook for New Product Development, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 5--34.Google Scholar
- Leonard, A., 2010, The Story of Stuff: How Our Obsession with Stuff Is Trashing The Planet, Our Communities, and Our Health, Constable& Robinson, London.Google Scholar
- Manzini, E., 2006, Design for Sustainability: How to Design Sustainable Solutions, Politecnico di Milano, Milan.Google Scholar
- Manzini, E., 2006, Design, Ethics, and Sustainability: Guidelines for a Transition Phase, DIS Politecnico di Milano, Milan.Google Scholar
- Manzini, E., 2007, The Scenario of a Multi-local Society: Creative Communities, Active Networks and Enabling Solutions, in Chapman, J. & Gant, N. (ed.), Designers, Visionaries + Other Stories: A Collection of Sustainable Design Essays, Earthscan.Google Scholar
- McDonough, W. & Braungart, M., 1992, The Hannover Principles: Design for Sustainability, in Lees-Maffei, G. and Houze, R. (ed.), The Design History Reader, 2010, Berg.Google Scholar
- Meadows D. H., 2008, Thinking in Systems: A Primer, Wright D. (ed.), Chelsea Green Publishing Company, Vermont.Google Scholar
- Mont, O. & Plepys, A., 2008, Sustainable Consumption on Progress: Should We Proud or Alarmed, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16/4, 531--537.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Orr, D. W., 2002, The Nature of Design: Ecology, Culture, and Human Intention, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Papanek, V., 1984, Design for The Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, Second ed., Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
- Pearce, F., 2010, People Quake: Mass Migration, Ageing Nations and The Coming Population Crash, Transworld Publishers, London.Google Scholar
- Saito, Y., 2007, Everyday Aesthetics, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Schor, J. B., 2004, Born to Buy: The Commercialized Child and The New Consumer Culture, Schribner, New York.Google Scholar
- The World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Thorpe, A., 2010, Design's Role in Sustainable Consumption, Design Issues, 26/2, 3--16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tischner, U. et.al., 2000, How to Do EcoDesign: A Guide for Environmentally and Economically Sound Design, German Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Tomkinson, B., 2009, Coping with Complexity: The Ability to Manage Complex Sustainability Problems, in Stibbe A. (ed.), The Handbook of Sustainability Literacy: Skills for a Changing World, Green Books, UK.Google Scholar
- Wahl, D. C. & Baxter, S., 2008, The Designer's Role in Facilitating Sustainable Solutions, Design Issues 24/2, 72--83.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walker, S., 2006, Object Lessons: Enduring Artifacts and Sustainable Solutions, Design Issues, 22/1, 20--31Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walker, S., 2006, Sustainable in Design: Explorations in Theory and Practice, Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
- Walker, S., 2010, Wrapped Attention: Designing Products for Evolving Permanence and Enduring Meaning, Design Issues, 26/4, 94--108.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wood, J., 2007, Relative Abundance: Fuller's discovery that the Glass is Always Half Full, in Chapman, J. and Gant, N. (ed.), Designers, Visionaries + Other Stories: A Collection of Sustainable Design Essays, Earthscan.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Soft systems networking in design thinking for a sustainable society
Recommendations
Further Connecting Sustainable Interaction Design with Sustainable Digital Infrastructure Design
LIMITS '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Computing Within LimitsThis paper advances the connections between sustainable interaction design (SID) also known as sustainable HCI (SHCI) and sustainable digital infrastructure design (SDID), building on prior work in the HCI archive. We describe trends in sustainable ...
How Design Thinking Can Foster Environmental Sustainability: Integrating Design Thinking into Circular Design Guide
ICIBE '20: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Industrial and Business EngineeringThe growing concern about environmental sustainability has given rise to a search for new methods and tools to apply to sustainable solutions. The concept of the Circular Economy (CE) has emerged as one powerful driver in the move towards ...
Simulation-based optimisation of a sustainable recovery network for Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment WEEE
In recent years, developing countries are facing huge challenges in the management of ‘Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment’ WEEE. Waste from electrical and electronic equipment contains hazardous materials that may have an impact on human ...
Comments