ABSTRACT
The importance of the quality of user experience in service encounter has been acknowledged in different disciplines, including Service Management, Marketing, and Design. However, the focus has been on tangible elements of a service, such as touchpoints, service evidence [21], servicescapes [4]. This paper argues that interpersonal interaction in service encounter plays a significant role in the quality of user experience, therefore should be taken into account into service design process. In particular, this paper pays attention on collaborative services where final users are actively involved, and assume the role of service co-producers.
To examine elements that facilitate interpersonal interaction in service, case studies on carpooling service were carried out. Based on a framework for sociability developed in interaction design discipline, 12 carpooling services in Europe and United States were analyzed. As opposed to managerial perspective, this paper suggests that the heterogeneity in the service performance, caused by the interaction between participants, is not a threat to the quality of user experience, but an opportunity to make the experience more unique, and special.
- Battarbee, K. 2004. Co-experience: understanding user experiences in social interaction. Doctoral Thesis. University of Art and Design Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
- Battarbee, K. 2003. Co-experience: the Social User Experience. Proceedings of Computer Human Interaction CHI'03. Extended Abstracts (730-731). New York, ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Battarbee, K. 2003. Defining Co-experience. Proceedings of Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. 23-26 June, Pittsburgh. 109--113. New York, NY: ACM Press Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bitner, M. J. 1992. Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, 57--71Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brereton, M., Ghelawat, S. 2010. Designing for participation in local social ridesharing networks --- grassroots prototyping of IT systems, In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, 29 November 2010, Sydney, Australia, pp. 199--202 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ceschin, F., Vezzoli, C., Zingale, S. 2010. An aesthetic for sustainable interactions in Product-Service System? In Proceedings of the LeNS conference, Bangalore, India, September 29 - October 1, 2010, 1490--1501Google Scholar
- Cipolla, C. 2007. Designing for interpersonal relational qualities in services: A model for Service Design theory and practice, Doctoral Thesis, Politecnico di MilanoGoogle Scholar
- Cook. L. S., Bowen, D. E., Chase, R. B., Dasu, S., Stewart, D. M., Tansik, D. A. 2002. Human issues in service design, Journal of Operations Management 20, 159--174Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hochheiser, H., Shneiderman, B. 2010. From Bowling Alone to Tweeting together: Technology-mediated social participation, Interactions, March+April 2010, 64--67 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jordan, P. 2003. Designing great stuff that people love. Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, xi-xii, Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
- Junginger S., Sangiorgi, D. 2009. Service Design and Organizational Change: Bridging the gap between rigour and relevance. In Proceedings of International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR), October 18--22, Seoul, KoreaGoogle Scholar
- Mont, O. 2004. Institutionalisation of sustainable consumption patterns based on shared use, Ecological Economics 50, 135--153Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pacenti, E. and Sangiorgi, D. 2010. Service design research pioneers: An overview of Service Design research developed in Italy since the '90s. In Design Research Journal, Ges Ut Av Svid, Stiftelsen Svensk Industridesign, 1(10), 26--33Google Scholar
- Preece, J. 2000. Online communities: Designing Usability, Supporting sociability, Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Google ScholarDigital Library
- Preece, J. 2001. Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success, Behavior and Information Technology Journal, 20, 5, 347--356Google ScholarCross Ref
- Prettenthaler, F. and Steininger K. W. 1999. From ownership to service use lifestyle: the potential of car sharing. Ecological Economics 28, 443--453Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sangiorgi, D. 2009. Building up a framework for Service design Research. In Proceedings of Connexity, 8th European Academy of Design conference, April 1-3, Aberdeen, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
- Sangiorgi, D. 2010. Transformative Services and Transformation Design. Paper presented at Second Nordic confrence on Service Design and Service Innovation, December 1--3, Linkoping, SwedenGoogle Scholar
- Shneiderman, B. 2000. Designing trust into online experience, Communications of the ACM, December 2000, Vol. 43, No. 12, 57--59 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sengers, P. 2003. The Engineering of Experience. In Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, 19--29, Kluwer Academic Publishers Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shostack, L. 1982. How to Design a Service. European Journal of Marketing 16 (1), 49--63Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stahel, W. R. 1998 From Products to Services: Selling performance instead of goods. In The IPTS (Institute for Prospective Technological Studies) Report, issue 27, September 1998, European Commission Joint Research CenterGoogle Scholar
- Victorino, L., Verman, R., Wardell, D. 2008 Service Scripting: A Customer's perspective of quality and performance. Cornell Hospitality Report, Vol. 8, No. 20, 6--13. December 2008. School of Hotel Administration, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Interpersonal interaction for pleasurable service experience
Recommendations
Relational Interaction: Challenges and Opportunities for Social Innovation Through Service Co-production
Human-Computer Interaction. Human Values and Quality of LifeAbstractThe significant role of the interaction between a service provider and a user in service production has been pointed out by a number of studies. While interpersonal service interaction has been studied mostly from the perspective of traditional ...
Leveraging Eclipse for integrated model-based engineering of web service compositions
eclipse '05: Proceedings of the 2005 OOPSLA workshop on Eclipse technology eXchangeIn this paper we detail the design and implementation of an Eclipse plug-in for an integrated, model-based approach, to the engineering of web service compositions. The plug-in allows a designer to specify a service's obligations for coordinated web ...
Research on the SOA-based Service Granularity Control
ITCS '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Second International Conference on Information Technology and Computer ScienceResearch in the basic principles of service granularity identified under the SOA framework and proposed to decompose services into three types these are basic services, synthesis services and composite services. It is proposed to decompose basic ...
Comments