skip to main content
10.1145/2347655.2347672acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesslipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving broadcast efficiency in wireless sensor network time synchronization protocols

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this work we proposed an algorithm to allow nodes in a wireless sensor network to interconnect in a way such that time stamp information can be efficiently distributed for network wide synchronization. The algorithm works by first establishing a level hierarchy in the network, and then solves set cover problems between adjacent levels through local interactions of the nodes. A proof is included to demonstrate the correctness of the distributed set cover method used in the algorithm. The algorithm features low overhead since it does not require any neighboring node list to be sent, making it ideal for networks with high connectivity. The efficiency and operation of the algorithm is studied through simulations.

References

  1. Abtin Keshavarzian and Huang Lee and Lakshmi Venkatraman. Wakeup Scheduling in Wireless Sensor Networks. MobiHoc, May 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Elson, L. Girod, and D. Estrin. Fine-Grained Network Time Synchronization using Reference Broadcasts. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 2002), December 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J.-J. Gagnepain. Sensitivity of Quartz Oscillators to the Environment: Characterization Methods and Pitfalls. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 37(5), September 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. Ganeriwal, R. K. Mani, and B. Srivastava. Timing-sync Protocol for Sensor Networks. SenSys, November 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability; A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, NY, USA, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. i Lu and R. Ravi. The power of local optimization: Approximation algorithms for maximum-leaf spanning tree. In In Proceedings, Thirtieth Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and Computing, pages 533--542, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. H. i Lu and R. Ravi. Approximating maximum leaf spanning trees in almost linear time. Journal of Algorithms, 29:132--141, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Lenzen, P. Sommer, and R. Wattenhofer. Optimal clock synchronization in networks. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys '09, pages 225--238, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Lund and M. Yannakakis. On the hardness of approximating minimization problems. J. ACM, 41:960--981, September 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Miklĺős Marĺőti and Branislav Kusy and Gyula Simon and ĺćkos Lĺędeczi. The Flooding Time Synchronization Protocol. SenSys, November 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. O. Mirabella, M. Brischetto, and A. Raucea. Evaluation of Clock Synchronization Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Days (WD), 2009 2nd IFIP, December 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Polastre, J. Hill, and D. Culler. Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, SenSys '04, pages 95--107, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. TGS (USA), INC. Product Information, CCMC series, October 2009. http://www.tgsinc.us/productFiles/CCMC\_serie.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. An energy-efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In INFOCOM 2002. Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE, volume 3, pages 1567--1576 vol.3, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Improving broadcast efficiency in wireless sensor network time synchronization protocols

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SLIP '12: Proceedings of the International Workshop on System Level Interconnect Prediction
      June 2012
      58 pages
      ISBN:9781450314374
      DOI:10.1145/2347655

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6of8submissions,75%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader