skip to main content
article
Free Access

The active database management system manifesto: a rulebase of ADBMS features

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 September 1996Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Active database systems have been a hot research topic for quite some years now. However, while “active functionality” has been claimed for many systems, and notions such as “active objects” or “events” are used in many research areas (even beyond database technology), it is not yet clear which functionality a database management system must support in order to be legitimately considered as an active system. In this paper, we attempt to clarify the notion of “active database management system” as well as the functionality it has to support. We thereby distinguish mandatory features that are needed to qualify as an active database system, and desired features which are nice to have. Finally, we perform a classification of applications of active database systems and identify the requirements for an active database management system in order to be applicable in these application areas.

References

  1. 1 R. Agrawal, R.J. Cochrane, B. Lindsay: On Maintaining Priorities in a Production Rule System. Proc. 17th VLDB, Barcelona, Spain, September 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2 A. Aiken, J. Widom, J.M. Hellerstein: Behaviour of Database Production Rules: Termination, Confluence, and Observable Determinism. Proc. SIGMOD, San Diego, June 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3 H. Branding, A. Buchmann, T. Kudrass, J. Zimmermann: Rules in an Open System: The REACH Rule System. Proc. Rules in Database Systems. Workshops in Computing, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4 S. Chakravarthy, D. Mishra: An Event Specification Language (Snoop) for Active Databases and Its Detection. Technical Report UF-CIS TR-91-23, CIS Department, University of Florida, September 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 S. Chakravarthy (ed): Special Issue on Active Databases. Bulletin of the TC on Data Engineering 15:1-4, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification. OMG Document 91.8.1, August 1991. © Digital Equipment Corp., Hewlett-Packard Company, HyperDesk Corp., ObjectDesign Inc., SunSoft Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 U. Dayal: Active Database Management Systems. Proc. 3rd Intl. Conf. on Data and Knowledge Bases, Jerusalem, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 U. Dayal, M. Hsu, R. Ladin: A Transactional Model for Long-Running Activities. Proc. 17th VLDB, Barcelona, Spain, September 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9 K.R. Dittrich: Object-Oriented Database Systems: The Notions and the Issues. In K.R. Dittrich, U. Dayal, A.P. Buchmann (eds): On Object-Oriented Database Systems. Topics in Information Systems, Springer 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 R. Elmasri, S.B. Navathe: Fundamentals of Database Systems. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11 A. Geppert, M. Berndtsson, D. Lieuwen, J. Zimmermann: Performance Evaluation of Active Database Management Systems Using the BEAST Benchmark. Technical Report 96.01, Department of Computer Science, University of Zurich, February 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12 M. Hsu, R. Ladin, D, McCarthy: An Execution Model for Active DBMS. Proc. 3rd Intl. Conf. on Data and Knowledge Bases, Jerusalem, Israel, June 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. 13 J.E.B. Moss: Nested Transactions: An Approach to Reliable Distributed Computing. MIT Press, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14 N.W. Paton, O. Diaz, M.H. Williams, J. Campin, A. Dinn, A. Jaime: Dimensions of Active Behaviour. Proc. Rules in Database Systems. Workshops in Computing, Springer-Verlag, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. 15 E. Simon, A. Kotz-Dittrich: Promises and Realities of Active Database Systems. Proc. 21st VLDB, Zurich, Switzerland, September 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16 J. Widom, S. Ceri (eds): Active Database Systems: Triggers and Rules for Advanced Database Processing. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The active database management system manifesto: a rulebase of ADBMS features

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM SIGMOD Record
            ACM SIGMOD Record  Volume 25, Issue 3
            Sept. 1996
            78 pages
            ISSN:0163-5808
            DOI:10.1145/234889
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 1996 Author

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 September 1996

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader