skip to main content
10.1145/2351356.2351363acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Causally motivated attribution for online advertising

Published:12 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In many online advertising campaigns, multiple vendors, publishers or search engines (herein called channels) are contracted to serve advertisements to internet users on behalf of a client seeking specific types of conversion. In such campaigns, individual users are often served advertisements by more than one channel. The process of assigning conversion credit to the various channels is called "attribution," and is a subject of intense interest in the industry. This paper presents a causally motivated methodology for conversion attribution in online advertising campaigns. We discuss the need for the standardization of attribution measurement and offer three guiding principles to contribute to this standardization. Stemming from these principles, we position attribution as a causal estimation problem and then propose two approximation methods as alternatives for when the full causal estimation can not be done. These approximate methods derive from our causal approach and incorporate prior attribution work in cooperative game theory. We argue that in cases where causal assumptions are violated, these approximate methods can be interpreted as variable importance measures. Finally, we show examples of attribution measurement on several online advertising campaign data sets.

References

  1. C. Achen. Interpreting and using regression. Number 29. Sage Publications, Inc., 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1):5--32, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Budescu. Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3):542, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. D. Chan, R. Ge, O. Gershony, T. Hesterberg, and D. Lambert. Evaluating online ad campaigns in a pipeline: causal models at scale. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 7--16. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. eMarkerter. Tbd. http://www.emarketer.com/Report.aspx?code=emarketer_2000774.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. eMarketer. Us online ad spend to close in on $40 billion. http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1008783.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. I. Finlo. Removing the barriers to growing online media spend: Transparency. http://www.admonsters.com/blog/removingbarriersgrowingonlinemediaspendtransparency, Nov. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. U. Grömping. Estimators of relative importance in linear regression based on variance decomposition. The American Statistician, 61(2):139--147, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Hunter, M. Jacobsen, R. Talens, and T. Winders. When money moves to digital, where should it go? http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Presentations_Whitepapers/2010/When_Money_Moves_to_Digital_Where_Should_It_Go, Sept. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. C. Inc. Media attribution. http://www.clearsaleing.com/product/media-attribution/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. C. M. Inc. What is c3 metrics? http://c3metrics.com/executive-summary/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. E. Inc. http://www.encoremetrics.com/solution.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Johnson and J. LeBreton. History and use of relative importance indices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 7(3):238, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Lewis, J. Rao, and D. Reiley. Here, there, and everywhere: correlated online behaviors can lead to overestimates of the effects of advertising. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web, pages 157--166. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Lipovetsky and M. Conklin. Analysis of regression in game theory approach. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 17(4):319--330, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. A course in game theory. The MIT press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Pearl. Causality: models, reasoning, and inference, volume 47. Cambridge Univ Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. F. Provost, B. Dalessandro, R. Hook, X. Zhang, and A. Murray. Audience selection for on-line brand advertising: privacy-friendly social network targeting. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 707--716. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Rubin. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of educational Psychology, 66(5):688, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. X. Shao and L. Li. Data-driven multi-touch attribution models. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 258--264. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. L. Shapley. A value for n-person games. The Shapley value, pages 31--40, 1953.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. O. Stitelman, B. Dalessandro, C. Perlich, and F. Provost. Estimating the effect of online display advertising on browser conversion. Data Mining and Audience Intelligence for Advertising (ADKDD 2011), page 8, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. C. Strobl, A. Boulesteix, A. Zeileis, and T. Hothorn. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC bioinformatics, 8(1):25, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. A. Tsiatis. Semiparametric theory and missing data. Springer Verlag, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. M. Van Der Laan. Statistical inference for variable importance. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2(1):2, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Van Der Laan, S. Dudoit, and S. Keles. Asymptotic optimality of likelihood-based cross-validation. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 3(1):4, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Causally motivated attribution for online advertising

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  ADKDD '12: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Data Mining for Online Advertising and Internet Economy
                  August 2012
                  77 pages
                  ISBN:9781450315456
                  DOI:10.1145/2351356

                  Copyright © 2012 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 12 August 2012

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate12of21submissions,57%

                  Upcoming Conference

                  KDD '24

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader