skip to main content
10.1145/2361276.2361285acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social sensitivity correlations with the effectiveness of team process performance: an empirical study

Published: 09 September 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Teamwork is essential in industry and a university is an excellent place to assess which skills are important and for students to practice those skills. A positive teamwork experience can also improve student learning outcomes. Prior research has established that teams with high levels of social sensitivity tend to perform well when completing a variety of specific, short-team, collaborative tasks. Social sensitivity is the personal ability to perceive and understand the feelings and viewpoints of others, and it is reliably measurable. Our hypothesis is that, social sensitivity can be a key component in positively mediating teamwork task activities and member satisfaction. Our goal is to bring attention to the fact that social sensitivity is an asset to teamwork. We report the results from an empirical study that investigates whether social sensitivity is correlated with the effectiveness of processes involved in teamwork and team member satisfaction in an educational setting. The results support our hypothesis that the social sensitivity is highly correlated with team effectiveness. It suggests, therefore, that educators in computer-related disciplines, as well as computer professionals in the workforce, should take the concept of social sensitivity seriously as an aid or obstacle to team performance and the teamwork experience.

References

[1]
Chan, C.L., Jiang, J.J., and Klein, G. 2008. Team Task Skills as a Facilitator for Application and Development Skills. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management. 55, 3 (Aug. 2008), 434--441.
[2]
Ikonen, M. and Kurhila, J. 2009. Discovering High-Impact Success Factors in Capstone Software Projects. In SIGITE'09 (Fairfax, Virginia, USA, October 2009), 235--244.
[3]
Smarkusky, D., Dempsey, R., Ludka, J., and de Quillettes, F. 2005. In SIGCSE '05 (St. Louis, Missouri USA, Feb. 2005).
[4]
Bacon, D.R., Stewart, K.A., and Silver, W.S. 1999. Lessons from the Best and Worst Student Team Experiences: How a Teacher Can Make the Difference. Journal of Management Education. 23, 467--488.
[5]
Hsiung, C.M. 2010. An experimental investigation into the efficiency of cooperative learning with consideration of multiple grouping criteria. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), pp. 670--692.
[6]
Begel, A. and Simon, B. 2008. Struggles of new college graduates in their first software development job. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (Portland, OR, USA, 2008). ACM.
[7]
Rademacher, A. Evaluating The Gap Between the Skills and Abilities of Graduating Computer Science Students and the Expectation of Industry. M.S. thesis, North Dakota State University, 2012.
[8]
Woolley, A.W., Chabris, C.F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., and Malone,T.W. 2010. Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science 2010. ePub ahead of print doi10.1126/science.1193147
[9]
Bender, L., Walia, G., Kambhampaty, K., Nygard, K.E., and Nygard, T.E. 2010. Social Sensitivity and Classroom Team Projects: An Empirical Investigation, Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE 2012: Teaching, Learning, and Collaborating. February 29 - March 3, 2012 Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
[10]
Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F., and Uzzi, B. 2007. The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science, vol 316, (May 18, 2007)
[11]
Wells, C. 2002. Teaching teamwork in information systems. In E. Cohen (Ed.), Challenges of IT education in the 21st century, pp. 1--24. Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing Group.
[12]
Oakley, B.A, Hanna, D.M., Kuzmyn, Z., and Felder, R.M. 2007. Best Practices Involving Teamwork in the Classroom: Results From a Survey of 6435 Engineering Student Respondents. IEEE Transactions On Education, vol. 50, no. 3, (August 2007)
[13]
Springer, L., Stanne, M.E., and Donovan, S.S. 1999. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), ppg. 21--51.
[14]
Felder, R.M., Felder, G.N., and Dietz, E.J. 1998. A logitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention v. comparisons with traditionally-taught students. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), pp. 469--480.
[15]
Swan, B.R., Magleby, C.S., and Todd, R. 1994. A Preliminary Analysis of Factors Affecting Engineering Design Team Performance, Proceedings of the ASEE 1994 Annual Meeting, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, June, 1994.
[16]
Cohen, S.G. and Bailey, D.E. 1997. What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite. Journal of Management. 23, 3, 239--290.
[17]
Hackman, J.R. 1983. A Normative Model of Work Team Effectiveness, Technical Report #2, Research Program on Group Effectiveness, Yale School of Organization and Management, November, 1983
[18]
Bradley, J.H. and Hebert, F.J. 1997. The effect of personality type on team performance. Journal of Management Development. 16, 5, 337--353.
[19]
Faraj, S. and Sproull, L. 2000. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science. 46, 12 (De. 2000), 1554--1568.
[20]
Smith, K.A., and Imbrie, P.K. 2004. Teamwork and project management (3rd Ed.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. BEST Series.
[21]
Haller, C.R., Gallagher, V.J., Weldon, T.L., and Felder, R.M. 2000. Dynamics of peer education in cooperative learning workgroups. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(3). Pp. 285--293.
[22]
Gorla, N. and Wah Lam, Y. 2004. Who Should Work With Whom? 2004. Communications of the ACM. 47, 6 (Jun. 2004), 79--82.
[23]
Shen, S., Prior, S.D., White, A.S., and Karamanoglu, M. 2007. Using Personality Type Differences to Form Engineering Design Teams. Engineering Education. 2, 2, 54--66.
[24]
Felder, R. and Brent, R. 2001. Effective strategies for cooperative learning. Journal of Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teaching. 10, 69--75.
[25]
Beranek, G., Zuser, W., and Grechenig, T. 2005. Functional Group Roles in Software Engineering Teams. In HSSE'05 (St. Louis Missouri USA, May 2005), 1--5.
[26]
Pieterse, V., Kourie, D., and Sonnekus, I. 2006. Software Engineering Team Diversity and Performance. In Proceedings of annual SAICSIT 204 (Somerset West South Africa 2006), 180--186.
[27]
Greenspan, S. 1981. Defining childhood social competence. Advances in Special Education. 3, 1--39.
[28]
Salovey, P. and Mayer, J.D. 1990. Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality. 9, 3, 185--211.
[29]
Sternberg, R.J. Handbook of intelligence, 2nd ed. 2000. (359--379). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
[30]
Kosmitzki, C. and John, O.P 1993 The implicit use of explicit conceptions of social intelligence. Personality & Individual Differences, vol. 15, pp. 11--23
[31]
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., and Plumb, I. 2001. The 'Reading the Mind in the Eyes' Test Revised Version: A Study with Normal Adults, and Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High-functioning Autism. Child Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 2, 241--251.
[32]
Hallerback, M.U., Lugnegard, T., Hjarthag, F., and Gillberg. C. 2009. Cognitive neuropsychiatry, 14 (Mar. 2009), 127--143.
[33]
Pedrini, D.T. and Pedrini, B.C. Vineland Social Maturity Scale Profile. Retrieved August 18, 2011 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED079342.pdf.
[34]
Mesmer-Magnus, J.R., and DeChurch, L.A. 2009. Information Sharing and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 94, 2, pp. 535--546.
[35]
Osborn, A.F. 1957. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-solving, 2nd ed. 1957. New York: Scribner.
[36]
American Heritage Dictionary, Retrieved December 27, 2011 from http://ahdictionary.com/
[37]
Maxwell, J.C. 2002. The 17 Essential Qualities of a Team Player: Becoming the Kind of Person Every Team Wants. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Inc.
[38]
Jenkins, G.D., Mitra, A., Gupta, N., and Shaw, J.D. 1998. Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, pp. 777--787.
[39]
Katzenbach, J. 1997. The myth of top management teams. Harvard Business Review, 75(6), pp. 82--92.
[40]
John, O.P. and Robins, R.W. 1994. Accuracy and Bias in Self-Perception: Individual Differences in Self-Enhancement and the Role of Narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol 66, no. 1, pp. 206--219.
[41]
Costa, A.C., Roe, R.A., and Taillieu, T. 2001. Trust within teams: The relation with performance effectiveness. European Journal Of Work And Organization
[42]
Conlon, D.E., Meyer, C.J., and Nowakowski, J.M. 2005. How does organizational justice affect performance, withdrawal, and couterproductive behavior? In J. Greenberg & J. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 301--327). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[43]
Avery, C.M., Walker, M.A. and Murphy, E.O. 2001. Teamwork Is An Individual Skill: Getting Your Work Done When Sharing Responsibility. San Francisco, CA:Berrett-Koehler.
[44]
Blanchard, K., Randolph, A., and Grazier, P. Go Team!: Take Your Team to the Next Level, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
[45]
Mersino, A. 2007. Emotional Intelligence for Project Managers. American Management Association, New York.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Gender Differences in the Group Dynamics of Smaller CS1 Project Groups2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343369(1-9)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Reflection as a social phenomenon: a conceptual framework toward group reflection researchEducational technology research and development10.1007/s11423-022-10164-271:2(237-265)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2022
  • (2020)Team Role Adoption and Distribution in Engineering Project MeetingsBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1002005710:2(57)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Social sensitivity correlations with the effectiveness of team process performance: an empirical study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ICER '12: Proceedings of the ninth annual international conference on International computing education research
    September 2012
    174 pages
    ISBN:9781450316040
    DOI:10.1145/2361276
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 09 September 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. collaboration
    2. computer science
    3. empirical study
    4. social sensitivity
    5. teams

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ICER '12
    Sponsor:
    ICER '12: International Computing Education Research Conference
    September 9 - 11, 2012
    Auckland, New Zealand

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 189 of 803 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    ICER 2025
    ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
    August 3 - 6, 2025
    Charlottesville , VA , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Gender Differences in the Group Dynamics of Smaller CS1 Project Groups2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343369(1-9)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
    • (2022)Reflection as a social phenomenon: a conceptual framework toward group reflection researchEducational technology research and development10.1007/s11423-022-10164-271:2(237-265)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2022
    • (2020)Team Role Adoption and Distribution in Engineering Project MeetingsBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1002005710:2(57)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2020
    • (2020)Examining gender diversity growth as a model for inclusion of all underrepresented persons in medical physicsMedical Physics10.1002/mp.1452447:12(5976-5985)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2020
    • (2019)Inferential Statistics in Computing Education ResearchProceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research10.1145/3291279.3339408(177-185)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2019
    • (2019)Does Social Sensitivity Impact Virtual Teams?Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3287324.3287409(36-42)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2019
    • (2017)Benefits of power posing: effects on dominance and social sensitivityComprehensive Results in Social Psychology10.1080/23743603.2016.12480802:1(55-67)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2017
    • (2016)A Method to Analyze Computer Science Students’ Teamwork in Online Collaborative Learning EnvironmentsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/279350716:2(1-28)Online publication date: 17-Feb-2016
    • (2013)Analysing computer science students' teamwork role adoption in an online self-organised teamwork activityProceedings of the 13th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/2526968.2526980(105-114)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2013
    • (undefined)Humor and Gender: Males and Females’ Understanding and Appreciation of Humor in Memes and Written Jokes: A Case Study of 3rd Year Students of English at Frères Mentouri Constantine 1 UniversitySSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.3716928

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media