skip to main content
10.1145/2362456.2362458acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesi-knowConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Collaborative modelling of reflection to inform the development and evaluation of work-based learning technologies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we report the use of a goal modelling approach to produce a shared model of reflective learning in a research project. The project successfully applied the i* modelling approach to bridge from theory to technical and work requirements in diverse application domains. This proved to be an effective approach for agreeing on important concepts as well as establishing common ground between a diverse range of scientific and practice-oriented people. This made it possible to agree upon an emerging reflective learning model in the project that made tacit knowledge explicit, and explicit knowledge more precise.

References

  1. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., and Mead, M. 1987. The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 11.3 (1987), 369--386 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Boud, D., Keogh, R., and Walker, D. 1985. Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. Routledge Falmer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, H. H. and Brennan, S. E. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on socially shared cognition, L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D., Teasley, Eds. APA, Washington, 127--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dewey, J. 1933. How we think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D. C. Heath, Boston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. http://istar.rwth-aachen.de/tikiindexphp?page=i%2A?Tools&structure=i%2A?Wiki?HomeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Krogstie, J., Dalberg V. and Jensen, S. M. 2004. Harmonising Business Processes of Collaborative Networked Organization Using Process Modelling. In Proceedings of PROVE'04 Toulouse, FranceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Krogstie, J. 2012: Model-based Development and Evolution of Information Systems: A Quality Approach. Springer, London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lockerbie, J. and Maiden, N. A. M. 2006: REDEPEND: Extending i* Modelling into Requirements Processes. In Proceedings 14th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, Minneapolis-Saint Paul, 361--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lockerbie, J., Karlsen, K., Puccio, M., Morreale, V. and Bonura, S. 2008. Using Requirements to Define Services for Service-Centric Food Traceability Information Systems. In Proceedings of SOCCER (Service-Oriented Computing: Consequences for Engineering Requirements) Workshop at RE'08 Conference, Barcelona, 15--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Maiden N. A. M., Jones S. V., Manning S., Greenwood J. And Renou L. 2004. Model-Driven Requirements Engineering: Synchronising Models in an Air Traffic Management Case Study. In Proceedings of CAiSE'2004, Springer, 368--383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Miles, M. B, and Huberman, A. M. 1994: Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Moody, D., Heymans, P. and Matulevicius, R. 2012. Visual syntax does; matter: improving the cognitive effectiveness of the i* visual notation. RE 15.2 (2010). Springer, 141--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ncube C., Lockerbie J. and Maiden N. A. M. (2007). Automatically Generating Requirements from i* Models: A Case Study with a Complex Airport Operations System. In Proceedings of REFSQ'07, 33--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nysetvold, A. G. and Krogstie, J. 2006. Assessing Business Process Modeling Languages Using a Generic Quality Framework. In Advanced Topics in Database Research Series Vol 5, Siau, K., Ed. Idea Group, 79--93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Krogstie, B., Prilla M., Knipfer, K., Wessel, D. and Pammer, V. 2012. Computer support for reflective learning in the workplace: A model. In Proceedings of ICALT 2012 (Rome, Italy, July 4--5, 2012). IEEE CS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pammer, V., Knipfer, K., Krogstie, B., Wessel, D., Prilla, M. and Lindstaedt, S. 2011. Reflective Learning at Work - A Position and Discussion Paper. In ARNets11 - Awareness and Reflection in Learning Networks at EC-TEL 2011, Palermo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Petre, M. 1995. Why looking isn't always seeing. Readership skills and graphical programming. Communications of the ACM, 38.6 (June 1995), 33--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Yu, E. S. K. and Mylopoulos, J. 1994. Using goals, rules, and methods to support reasoning in business process reengineering. In: Proc. of HICCS'27, Nunamaker, J. F. and Sprague, R. H., Eds. IEEE CS Press., 234--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zachos K., Lockerbie, J., Hughes B., and Matthews P. 2011. Towards a framework for describing cloud service characteristics for use by chief information officers. In Proceedings of the RESS Workshop, Trento, Italy, 16--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Collaborative modelling of reflection to inform the development and evaluation of work-based learning technologies

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        i-KNOW '12: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies
        September 2012
        244 pages
        ISBN:9781450312424
        DOI:10.1145/2362456

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 September 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate77of238submissions,32%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader