skip to main content
10.1145/2362724.2362782acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiixConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluation of search quality differences and the impact of personality styles in native and foreign language searching tasks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Taking individual differences into consideration is a foundational issue of Human-Computer Interaction research. The current paper examines the differences that arise during native and foreign language information-seeking tasks. Seventeen Hungarian college students, with significant but non-heritage knowledge of English, participated in the study. We examined the impact of search strategies and personality types on search outcome quality. Our results show interesting variations in searchers' success in their native and foreign languages. In-depth search strategies work better and allow searchers to achieve the same success rate in a foreign language as in their native language. More empathy toward the search task also seems to improve results.

References

  1. Aula, A., Kellar, M. 2009. Multilingual search strategies. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference extended abstracts on Human Factors in computing systems. CHIEA '09. ACM, New York, NY, 3865--3870. DOI=10.1145/1520340.1520585 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Marlow, J., Clough, P., Cigarran, R. J., Artiles, J. 2008. Exploring the Effects of Language Skills on Multilingual Web Search. In Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on IR Research. Glasgow, UK, April, 2008. 126--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Petrelli, D., Hansen, P., Beaulieu, M., Sanderson, M. 2002. User requirements elicitation for Cross-Language Information Retrieval. In The New Review of Information Behaviour Research. 2. 17--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Petrelli, D., Hansen, P., Beaulieu, M, Sanderson, M., Demetriou, G., Herring, P. 2004. Observing users-designing Clarity: A case study on the user-centred design of a cross-language retrieval system. In Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55, 10. 923--934 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hansen, P., Karlgren, J. 2005. Effects of foreign language and task scenario on relevance assessment. In Journal of Documentation 61, 5. 623--639.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Pocius, K. E., 1991. Personality factors in human-computer interaction: A review of the literature. In Computers in Human Behavior. 7. 103--135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldstein, K. M., Blackman, S. 1978. Cognitive Style. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Palmquist, R. A., Kim, K-S. 2000. Cognitive Style and OnLine Database Search Experience as Predictors of Web Search Performance. In Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51, 6. 558--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ford, N., Wilson, T. D., Foster, A., Ellis, D. 2002. Information-seeking and Mediated Searching. Part 4. Cognitive Styles in Information-seeking. In Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53, 9. 728--735. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ahmad, R., Wang, J., Hercegfi, K. and Komlodi, A. 2011. Different People Different Styles: Impact of Personality Style in Web Sites Credibility Judgement. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction International Conference (Orlando, FL, USA July 9--14, 2011). DOI=http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2027981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Izsó, L. and Takács, I. 1997. Users' Manual of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) (Myers-Briggs Típus Indikátor Felhasználói Kézikönyve). Manuscript in Hungarian. Department of Ergonomics and Psychology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. McCaulley, M. H., 1993. Does a country or a culture have a type? Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type. http://www.capt.org/Research/Home.cfmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ludford, P. J., Terveen, L. G. 2003. Does an individual's Myers-Briggs Type Indicator preference influence task-oriented technology use? Interact 2003 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Zurich, Switzerland).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hercegfi, K. 2011. Event Related Assessment of Hypermedia Based E-Learning Materials with an HRV-Based Method That Considers Individual Differences in Users. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 17, 2, (2011) 119--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Komlodi, A., Jozsa, E., Koles, M., Hercegfi, K. 2011. Search Quality Differences in Native and Foreign Language Searching. HCIR2011: Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval (Mountain View, CA, USA, October 20, 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Myers, I. B., Myers, P. B., 1980. Gifts differing. Paolo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lyons, M. L., 1985. The DP Psyche. In Datamation. 31. 103--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation of search quality differences and the impact of personality styles in native and foreign language searching tasks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader