skip to main content
10.1145/2370216.2370470acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Balancing human agency and object agency: an end-user interview study of the internet of things

Published: 05 September 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Advances in the field of the Internet of Things (IoT) have made it possible for everyday objects to attain agency. However, it is unclear how laypersons perceive the increasingly active artifacts. These perceptions are likely to foreground their future responses to IoT objects as they become relevant actors in the physical world and begin to influence everyday user experience. We conducted an in-depth interview study to investigate individuals' knowledge, attitudes, expectations and concerns relating to IoT technologies. Findings show that affordances such as interactivity and modality can be reconceptualized in order to enhance user perceptions of relatedness with the objects. Different from technology-centric and user-centric approaches, the paper suggests a balance between human agency and object agency by adopting a need-oriented design paradigm when building an integral, self-adjusting, user-relevant archetype of IoT.

References

[1]
Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory: An argentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52 (2001), 1--26.
[2]
Criel, J., Vanderhulst, G., Kawsar, F., and Trappeniers. L. A co-creation platform for creative engagement of end-users in a connected object space. In Proc. NoME-IoT '11, ACM Press (2011), 9--14.
[3]
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11 (2000), 227--268.
[4]
Gulati, V. Thingbook: A user created Internet of Things. https://webfiles.uci.edu/vgulati/ThingBook_GulatiVrishti.pdf
[5]
International Telecommunication Union. Internet report: The Internet of things. http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/publications/internetofthings.
[6]
Kröner, A., Brandherm, B., and Schneider, M. Investigating communication needs of digital object memories for user interaction. In Proc. NoME-IoT '11, ACM Press (2011), 15--16.
[7]
Marathe, S. Control and agency customization video games: A theoretical approach to learning outcomes. International Communication Association (2008).
[8]
Nass, C., Lombard, M., Henriksen, L., and Steuer, J. Anthropocentrism and computers. Behaviour and Information Technology 14, 4(1995), 229--238.
[9]
Nass, C., Steuer, J., and Tauber, E. R. Computers are social actors. In Proc. CHI '94, ACM Press (1994), 72--78.
[10]
Sundar, S. S. Self as source: Agency and customization in interactive media. International Communication Association (2006).
[11]
Sundar, S. S., and Nass, C. Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication 51, 1(2001), 52--72.
[12]
Tollmar, K. Dual media design: Sharing memories through digital object. In Proc. DOME-IoT 2010, ACM Press (2010).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Responsible Automation: Exploring Potentials and Losses through Automation in Human–Computer Interaction from a Psychological PerspectiveInformation10.3390/info1508046015:8(460)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2024
  • (2024)The Varieties of Agency in Human–Smart Device Relationships: The Four Agency ProfilesFuture Internet10.3390/fi1603009016:3(90)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Bridging awareness and resistance: Using algorithmic knowledge against controversial contentBig Data & Society10.1177/2053951724129604611:4Online publication date: 10-Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Balancing human agency and object agency: an end-user interview study of the internet of things

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UbiComp '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing
    September 2012
    1268 pages
    ISBN:9781450312240
    DOI:10.1145/2370216
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 September 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. customization
    2. digital memories
    3. internet of things
    4. object agency
    5. user agency

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    Ubicomp '12
    Ubicomp '12: The 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing
    September 5 - 8, 2012
    Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh

    Acceptance Rates

    UbiComp '12 Paper Acceptance Rate 58 of 301 submissions, 19%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)85
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Responsible Automation: Exploring Potentials and Losses through Automation in Human–Computer Interaction from a Psychological PerspectiveInformation10.3390/info1508046015:8(460)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2024
    • (2024)The Varieties of Agency in Human–Smart Device Relationships: The Four Agency ProfilesFuture Internet10.3390/fi1603009016:3(90)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Bridging awareness and resistance: Using algorithmic knowledge against controversial contentBig Data & Society10.1177/2053951724129604611:4Online publication date: 10-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Better to Ask Than Assume: Proactive Voice Assistants’ Communication Strategies That Respect User Agency in a Smart Home EnvironmentProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642193(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Interacting with Healthcare Chatbot: Effects of Status Cues and Message Contingency on AI Credibility AssessmentInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2387396(1-13)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2024
    • (2024)News bylines and perceived AI authorship: Effects on source and message credibilityComputers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100093(100093)Online publication date: Oct-2024
    • (2023)Do You Mind? User Perceptions of Machine ConsciousnessProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581296(1-19)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)“Oh, happy day!” Examining the role of AI-powered voice assistants as a positive technology in the formation of brand loyaltyJournal of Research in Interactive Marketing10.1108/JRIM-10-2022-032817:5(794-812)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Review of the theory, principles, and design requirements of human-centric Internet of Things (IoT)Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing10.1007/s12652-023-04539-314:3(2827-2859)Online publication date: 4-Feb-2023
    • (2022)Can the Internet of Things Persuade Me? An Investigation Into Power Dynamics in Human-Internet of Things InteractionFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2022.88311013Online publication date: 28-Jun-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media