skip to main content
10.1145/2378104.2378105acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design of a multiagent-based e-marketplace to secure service trading on the internet

Published:03 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Electronic marketplaces are not always easily regulated using traditional legal systems. As a result, suitable dispute prevention and resolution mechanisms for electronic marketplaces are of interest to design. In this paper, we design a multiagent-based e-marketplace where participants represented by autonomous software agents may be egocentric, strategic and even malicious. Our marketplace focuses on trading arbitrable and replicatable services, such as computational resources and data storage, over the Internet. We propose a novel dispute prevention and resolution mechanism that is theoretically proven to be able to induce good conduct for marketplace participants. Our marketplace also features cost-effectiveness, robustness and budget balance.

References

  1. I. Ashlagi, D. Monderer, and M. Tennenholtz. Mediators in position auctions. Games and Economic Behavior, 67(1):2--21, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. Ba and P. A. Pavlou. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS quarterly, 26(3):243--268, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Ba, A. B. Whinston, and H. Zhang. Building trust in online auction markets through an economic incentive mechanism. Decision Support Systems, 35(3):273--286, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Bakos and C. Dellarocas. Cooperation without enforcement? a comparative analysis of litigation and online reputation as quality assurance mechanisms. In Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, pages 127--142, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. K.-Y. Chen, T. Hogg, and N. Wozny. Experimental study of market reputation mechanisms. In J. S. Breese, J. Feigenbaum, and M. I. Seltzer, editors, ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pages 234--235. ACM, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Dash, S. Ramchurn, and N. Jennings. Trust-based mechanism design. In Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. IEEE Computer Society, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Daskalopulu, T. Dimitrakos, and T. Maibaum. Evidence-based electronic contract performance monitoring. Group decision and negotiation, 11(6):469--485, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Dellarocas. The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10):1407--1424, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. Guttman, A. Moukas, and P. Maes. Agent-mediated electronic commerce: A survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 13(02):147--159, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. The Insight Research Corporation. Grid Computing: A vertical Market Perspective 2006--2011, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Jøsang, R. Ismail, and C. Boyd. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems, 43(2):618--644, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Kollock. The production of trust in online markets. Advances in group processes, 16(1):99--123, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Q. Li and K. M. Martin. A secure marketplace for online services that induces good conduct. In Short Paper Proceedings of the IFIP WG 11.11 International Conference on Trust Management, 2010. ISSN:2079--2263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Z. Milosevic, A. Jøsang, T. Dimitrakos, and M. A. Patton. Discretionary enforcement of electronic contracts. In Proc. of the Sixth International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland, pages 39--50, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Monderer and M. Tennenholtz. Strong mediated equilibrium. Artificial Intelligence, 173(1):180--195, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Osborne. An Introduction to Game Theory. Oxford University Press, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. P. Resnick and R. Zeckhauser. Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay's reputation system. In M. R. Baye, editor, The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce, volume 11 of Advances in Applied Microeconomics, pages 127--157. Elsevier Science, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Zhang and R. Cohen. Design of a mechanism for promoting honesty in e-marketplaces. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 1495--1500. AAAI Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Zhou. Non-repudiation in Electronic Commerce. Artech House, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Design of a multiagent-based e-marketplace to secure service trading on the internet

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICEC '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electronic Commerce
        August 2011
        261 pages
        ISBN:9781450314282
        DOI:10.1145/2378104

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 August 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate150of244submissions,61%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader