skip to main content
10.1145/2378104.2378124acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social support mechanism in micro-blogosphere

Published:03 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the advance of Internet, online social networks could be seen as a large expert group exclusively belongs to online users. The social appraisal support involves the feedback about friends' opinions which represent the opportunities for sales. In this paper, a mechanism composed with social network analysis (SNA), intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is proposed to achieve social appraisal support for online users within micro-blogosphere. The proposed mechanism can successfully summarize the collective opinions from online social network and further speed up the decision process in support users' purchasing behaviors.

References

  1. Atanassov, K. T. 1986. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bangalore, Analysis on the General Profile of Users on Plurk.com. InRev Systems. Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/bexdeep/plurk-analysis-4136802 Accessed in February 20, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H, Wang T. G. 2006. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42, 3, 1872--1888. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chou, S. Y., Chang Y. H., and Shen, C. Y. 2008. A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes. European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 132--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. De, S. K., Biswas, R., and Roy, A. R. 2000. Some operations on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 477--484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ferlander, S. 2007. The importance of different forms of social capital for health. Acta Sociologica, 50, 115--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 6, 1360--1380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hinde, C. J., Patching, R. S., and McCoy, S. A. 2008. Semantic transfer and contradictory evidence in intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In Proceedings of 2008 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Hong Kong, 2095--2102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. House, J. S. 1981. Work Stress and Social Support. Reading, Mass: Addison-WesleyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu, Y. C. 2008. Classification performance evaluation of single-layer perceptron with Choquet integral-based TOPSIS. Applied Intelligence, 29, 3, 204--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., and Chowdury, A. 2009. Twitter Power: Tweets as Electronic Word of Mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 11, 2169--2188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. JAVA, A., Song, X., Finin, T., and Tseng, B. 2007. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis (WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 56--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kilduff, M. 1992. The friendship network as a decision-making resource: Dispositional moderators of social influences on organizational choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1, 168--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Krackhardt, D., and Porter, L. W. 1985. When Friends Leave: A Structural Analysis of the Relationship between Turnover and Stayers' Attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 2, 242--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kuo, M. S., Tzeng, G. H., and Huang, W. C. 2007. Group decision-making based on concepts of ideal and anti-ideal points in a fuzzy environment. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45, 3--4, 324--339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Li, D. F. 2007. Compromise ratio method for fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 7, 3, 807--817. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Li, Y. M., Kao, C. P. 2009. TREPPS: A Trust-based Recommender System for Peer Production Services. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 2, 3263--3277. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Liu, H. W., and Wang, G. J. 2007. Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. European Journal of Operational Research, 179, 220--233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. McFedries, P. 2007. Technically speaking: All a-twitter. IEEE Spectrum, 44, 10, 84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mu, X. W., Chen Y., Qu, L. L., and Li, T. Y. 2009. A new User Profile Model based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy set for personalized information analysis and sharing. In proceedings of 2009 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, Moscow, 64--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Szmidt, E., and Kacprzyk, J. 2000. Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 114, 505--518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ye, J. 2009. Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method based on a novel accuracy function under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 6899--6902. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Yeh, C. H., and Chang, Y. H. 2009. Modeling subjective evaluation for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 194, 464--473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Zhai J., Chen Y., Wang Q., and Lv M. 2008. Fuzzy ontology models using intuitionistic fuzzy set for knowledge sharing on the semantic web. In proceedings of 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, Xian, 465--469.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhao, D., and Rosson, M. B. 2009. How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work (GROUP '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 243--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Social support mechanism in micro-blogosphere

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICEC '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electronic Commerce
        August 2011
        261 pages
        ISBN:9781450314282
        DOI:10.1145/2378104

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 August 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate150of244submissions,61%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader