skip to main content
10.1145/2378104.2378132acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Some clues to the determinants of feedback behaviour

Published:03 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We report the results of an experiment designed to investigate the determinants of feedback behaviour in electronic markets. Ratings driven by disconfirmed expectations should in principle reduce the asymmetric information problems of these markets. However, some other motives may influence the decisions of the sellers. In particular, empirical evidence suggests that the economic surplus obtained from the transaction may have some bearing on the way sellers are rated. Our design was meant to test whether and to what extent disconfirmed expectations and/or the transaction surplus play a role in determining the feedback behaviour of buyers in e-marketplaces. The results indicate that both factors affect the ratings, the latter having the stronger effect. One possible empirical implication could be that when an online purchase is a good deal a seller will typically get away with (moderately) exaggerated descriptions of the good on sale, obtaining a positive rating from the buyers.

References

  1. Anderson, E. W., M. W. Sullivan. 1993. The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science 12, 2 (Spring, 1993) 125--143. DOI=10.1287/mksc.12.2.125Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Colucci, D., Salotti, S., Valori, V. 2011. Good Bargains and Reputable Sellers: An Experimental Investigation of Electronic Feedback Systems. DiMaD Working Papers, 2011--04 (March 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dellarocas, C. 2003. The Digitalization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms. Management Science 49, 10 (Oct. 2003) 1407--1424. DOI=10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dellarocas, C., C. Wood. 2008. The Sound of Silence in Online Feedback: Estimating Trading Risks in the Presence of Reporting Bias. Management Science 54, 3 (May 2008) 460--476. DOI=10.1287/mnsc.1070.0747 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fischbacher, U. 2007. z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic Experiments. Experimental Economics 10, 2 (June 2007) 171--178. DOI= 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gavish, B., C. L. Tucci. 2008. Reducing internet auction fraud. Communications of the ACM 51, 5 (May 2008) 89--97. DOI= 10.1145/1342327.1342343 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Houser, D., J. Wooders. 2006. Reputation in Auctions: Theory, and Evidence from eBay. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 15, 2 (Summer 2006) 353--369. DOI=10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00103.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Inman, J. J., J. S. Dyer, J. J. Jianmin. 1997. A generalized utility model of disappointment and regret effects on post-choice valuation. Marketing Science 16(2), 97--111. DOI= 10.1287/mksc.16.2.97Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jin, G. Z., A. Kato. 2006. Price, Quality, and Reputation: Evidence from an Online Field Experiment. The RAND Journal of Economics 37, 4 (December 2006) 983--1004. DOI= 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00067.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lucking-Reiley, D., D. Bryan, N. Prasad, D. Reeves. 2007. Pennies from eBay: The Determinants of Price in Online Auctions. Journal of Industrial Economics 55, 2 (June 2007) 223--233. DOI= 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00309.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Yang, J., X. Hu, H. Zhang. 2007. Effects of a Reputation Feedback System on an Online Consumer-to-Consumer Auction Market. Decision Support Systems 44 93--105. DOI= 10.1016/j.dss.2007.03.005 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Zhang, J. 2006. The Roles of Players and Reputation: Evidence from eBay Online Auctions. Decision Support Systems 42 1800--1818. DOI=10.1016/j.dss.2006.03.008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Some clues to the determinants of feedback behaviour

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICEC '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electronic Commerce
        August 2011
        261 pages
        ISBN:9781450314282
        DOI:10.1145/2378104

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 August 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate150of244submissions,61%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader