ABSTRACT
Financial time series data exhibits long memory phenomena, where certain behaviours in the market have a persistent influence on the market over time. It has been suggested that imitation of successful trader strategies by other less successful traders is an important factor in contributing to this persistence. We test this explanation by using an existing adaptive agent-based model and we find that the robustness of the model is directly related to the dynamics of learning; models in which learning converges to a stationary steady state fail to produce realistic time series data. In contrast, models in which learning leads to dynamic strategy switching behaviour in the steady state are able to reproduce the long memory phenomena. We demonstrate that a model which incorporates contrarian trading strategies results in more dynamic behaviour in steady state, and hence is able to produce more realistic results. We also demonstrate that a non-learning contrarian model that performs dynamic strategy switching produces long memory phenomena and therefore that learning is not necessary. Models that can be validated against properties of empirical high frequency financial data should allow exploration of the robustness and reliability qualities of market mechanism modifications.
- J. Bouchaud, Y. Gefen, M. Potters and M. Wyart. Fluctuations and response in financial markets: the subtle nature of "random" price changes. Quantitative Finance, 4(2):176--190, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Cont. Empirical Properties of Asset Returns: stylized Facts and Statistical Issues. Quantitative Finance, 1:223--236, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Conrad, and G. Kaul. An Anatomy of Trading Strategies. The Review of Financial Studies, 11(3):489--519, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Z. Ding, C. W. J. Granger, and R. F. Engle. A Long Memory Property of Stock Market Returns and a New Model. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1:83--106, 1993.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. F. Engle and A. J. Patton. What Good is a Volatility Model? Quantitative Finance, 1:237--245, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. D. Farmer and D. Foley. The Economy Needs Agent-Based Modelling. Nature 460, 685--686, 2009.Google Scholar
- O. Hermsen. Does Basel II destabilize financial markets? An agent-based financial market perspective. The European Physical Journal B 73(1):29--40, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Hommes. Coordination of Expectations in Asset Pricing Experiments. Review of Financial Studies 18(3):955--980, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. G. Lamoureux and W. D. Lastrapes. Heteroskedasticity in Stock Return Data:Volume Versus GARCH Effects. Journal of Finance, 45(1):221--229, 1990.Google Scholar
- B. LeBaron and R. Yamamoto. Long-memory in an Order-Driven Market. Physica A, 383:85--89, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. LeBaron and R. Yamamoto. The Impact of Imitation on Long-Memory in an Order Driven Market. Eastern Economic Journal, 34:504--517, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Lillo, S. Mike, and J. D. Farmer. The long memory of the efficient market. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 8(3), 2004.Google Scholar
- F. Lillo, S. Mike, and J. D. Farmer. Theory for Long Memory in Supply and Demand. Physical Review E, 7106:287--297, 2005.Google Scholar
- A. W. Lo. Long-Term Memory in Stock Market Prices. Econometrica, 59:1279--1314, 1991.Google Scholar
- A. W. Lo. Reconciling Efficient Markets with Behavioral Finance: The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis. Journal of Investment Consulting, 7(2):21--44, 2005.Google Scholar
- I. Lobato and C. Velasco. Long Memory in Stock-Market Trading Volume. Business and Economic Statistics, 18(4):410--426, 2000.Google Scholar
- K. Mannaro, M. Marchesi, and A. Setzu. Using an artificial financial market for assessing the impact of Tobin-like transaction taxes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67(2):445--462, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. N. Mantegna and E. H. Stanley. Stock Market Dynamics and Turbulence: Parallel Analysis of Fluctuation Phenomena. Physica A, 239(1--3):255--266, 1997.Google Scholar
- R. N. Mantegna and E. H. Stanley. Scaling Behavior in the Dynamics of an Economic Index. Nature, 376:46--49, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Pagan. The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Journal of Empirical Finance, 3(1):15--102, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Preis, W. Paul and J. Schneider. Fluctuation patterns in high-frequency financial asset returns. Europhysics Letters, 82 68005, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Rayner, S. Phelps and N. Constantinou. Testing Adaptive Expectations Models of a Continuous Double Auction Against Empirical Facts. Trading Agent Design and Analysis Workshop (IJCAI-11). (forthcoming) July 2011.Google Scholar
- F. Westerhoff Central bank intervention and feedback traders. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 13(5):419--427, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Learning is neither sufficient nor necessary: a dynamic agent-based model of long memory in financial markets
Recommendations
Necessary and sufficient conditions for learning with correction queries
We investigate the newly introduced model of learning with correction queries in the context of query learning. We present necessary and sufficient conditions for a class of languages to be inferable within this setting. We also offer a complete picture ...
Is Competitive Advantage a Necessary and Sufficient Antecedent of Superior Financial Performance?: Evidence From the Maritime Shipping Industry
Although the concept and the sources of competitive advantage have been extensively researched, literature still offers limited answers to the questions why, in some cases, there is overperformance despite the absence of competitive advantage and ...
Comments