skip to main content
10.1145/2380552.2380608acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiteConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The geographic information science and technology and information technology bodies of knowledge: an ontological alignment

Published:11 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a philosophical discussion of ontological alignments between the fields of Geographic Information Science and Technology (GIS & T) and Information Technology (IT) based on existing bodies of knowledge (BOKs). We argue that tighter integration of concepts from GIS & T into IT curriculum can provide three specific opportunities for IT education - enhanced spatial thinking, new interdisciplinary and innovative application areas, and student employment opportunities. We also discuss specific ideas for curricular integration based on the alignments and provide a list of free and open source GIS & T software, data and learning resources for IT educators interested in incorporating GIS & T concepts and technologies into their teaching.

References

  1. Dibiase, D., DeMers, M., Johnson, A., Kemp, K., Luck, A. T., Plewe, B. and Wentz, E. Geographic information science and technology body of knowledge. 0892912677, Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mark, D. Geographic information science: Defining the field. Foundations of geographic information science (2000), 3--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. DiBiase, D., Corbin, T., Fox, T., Francica, J., Green, K., Jackson, J., Jeffress, G., Jones, B. and Mennis, J. The new geospatial technology competency model: Bringing workforce needs into focus. URISA Journal, 22, 2 (2010), 55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lunt, B. M., Ekstrom, J., Gorka, S., Hislop, G., Kamali, R., Lawson, E., LeBlanc, R., Miller, J. and Reichgelt, H. Information Technology 2008: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Technology. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) IEEE Computer Society, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sowa, J. F. Signs, Processes, and Language Games: Foundations for Ontology. http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/signproc.htm, last retrieved: 1 June 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bechhofer, S., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D., Patel-Schneider, P. and Stein, L. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/, last retrieved: 21 May 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cruz, I. F., Antonelli, F. P. and Stroe, C. AgreementMaker: efficient matching for large real-world schemas and ontologies. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2, 2 (2009), 1586--1589. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Pavel, S. and Euzenat, J. Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 99 (2011), 1--1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Robinson, A., Chen, J., Lengerich, E., Meyer, H. and MacEachren, A. Combining usability techniques to design geovisualization tools for epidemiology. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 32, 4 (2005), 243--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. National Research Council Learning to Think Spatially: GIS as a Support System in the K-12 cirriculum. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. National Research Council Successful Response Starts With a Map: Improving Geospatial Support for Disaster Management. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvard Humanitarian Initiative. Disaster Relief 2.0: The Future of Information Sharing in Humanitarian Emergencies. Washington, D.C. and Berkshire, UK, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. National Sciene Board. Preparing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators: Identifying and Developing our Nation's Human Capital. National Sciene Foundation, Washington, DC, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Bouchard, B. and Tomaszewski, B. Automated GLIDE Number Resource Consolidation for Rapid Disaster Location Identification. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the International Association For The Study Of Information Systems For Crisis Response And Management (ISCRAM) (Vancouver, Canada), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gewin, V. Mapping opportunities. Nature, 427, 6972 (2004), 376--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Bureau of Labor Statistics Surveying and Mapping Technicians. http://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/surveying-and-mapping-technicians.htm, last retrieved: 24 May 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The geographic information science and technology and information technology bodies of knowledge: an ontological alignment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGITE '12: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Information technology education
        October 2012
        266 pages
        ISBN:9781450314640
        DOI:10.1145/2380552

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 October 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate176of429submissions,41%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader