skip to main content
10.1145/2380718.2380741acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fairness on the web: alternatives to the power law

Published:22 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents several measures of fairness and inequality based on the degree distribution in networks, as alternatives to the well-established power-law exponent. Networks such as social networks, communication networks and the World Wide Web itself are often characterized by their unequal distribution of edges: Few nodes are attached to many edges, while many nodes are attached to only few edges. The inequality of such network structures is typically measured using the power-law exponent, stating that the number of nodes with a given degree is proportional to that degree taken to a certain exponent. However, this approach has several weaknesses, such as its narrow applicability and expensive computational complexity. Beyond the fact that power laws are by far not a universal phenomenon on the Web, the power-law exponent has the surprising property of being negatively correlated with the usual notion of inequality, making it unintuitive as a fairness measure. As alternatives, we propose several measures based on the Lorenz curve, which is used in economics but rarely in networks study, and on the information-theoretical concept of entropy. We show in experiments on a large collection of online networks that these measures do not suffer under the drawbacks of the power-law exponent.

References

  1. Albert, R., and Barabási, A.-L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 1 (2002), 47--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barabási, A.-L., and Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 5439 (1999), 509--512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bi, Z., Faloutsos, C., and Korn, F. The 'DGX' distribution for mining massive, skewed data. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2001), 17--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bollacker, K., Lawrence, S., and Giles, C. L. CiteSeer: An autonomous Web agent for automatic retrieval and identification of interesting publications. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents (1998), 116--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bollobás, B. Modern Graph Theory. Springer, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Celma, Ò. Music recommendation datasets for research. http://www.dtic.upf.edu/~ocelma/MusicRecommendationDataset/lastfm-1K.html, May 2010. Version 1.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., and Newman, M. E. J. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51, 4 (2009), 661--703. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kunegis, J., Lommatzsch, A., and Bauckhage, C. The Slashdot Zoo: Mining a social network with negative edges. In Proc. Int. World Wide Web Conf. (2009), 741--750. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lewis, D. D., Yang, Y., Rose, T. G., and Li, F. RCV1: A new benchmark collection for text categorization research. J. Machine Learning Research 5 (2004), 361--397. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lima-Mendez, G., and van Helden, J. The powerful law of the power law and other myths in network biology. Molecular BioSystems 5, 12 (2009), 1482--1493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Manning, C. D., and Schütze, H. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Massa, P., and Avesani, P. Controversial users demand local trust metrics: an experimental study on epinions.com community. In Proc. American Association for Artificial Intelligence Conf. (2005), 121--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Newman, M. E. J. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary Phys. 46, 5 (2006), 323--351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pareto, V. Manuale di economia politica con una introduzione alla scienza sociale (Manual of Political Economy). Milano: Societa Editrice Libraria, 1919.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Viswanath, B., Mislove, A., Cha, M., and Gummadi, K. P. On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook. In Proc. Workshop on Online Social Networks (2009), 37--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Wang, B., Tang, H., Guo, C., and Xiu, Z. Entropy optimization of scale-free networks robustness to random failures. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 363, 2 (2006), 591--596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Wu, J., Tan, Y.-J., Deng, H.-Z., and Zhu, D.-Z. A new measure of heterogeneity of complex networks based on degree sequence. In Unifying Themes in Complex Systems. 2010, 66--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Fairness on the web: alternatives to the power law

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WebSci '12: Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference
      June 2012
      531 pages
      ISBN:9781450312288
      DOI:10.1145/2380718

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      Websci '24
      16th ACM Web Science Conference
      May 21 - 24, 2024
      Stuttgart , Germany

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader