Ricardo Cruz Mendoza
ABSTRACT
When we talk about movement-based systems we can assume that their users move. Particularly, in rehabilitation systems, patients have to perform exercises to re-train particular bodily skills through bodily activity. Many examples of those systems exist, but how we interact with them may differ, in some cases the patient performs the bodily activity through virtual environments (virtual reality), in other cases the activity could be mixed (mixed reality) or yet in another cases the activity could be through tangible interfaces, but in all of these cases, interfaces to perform bodily activity beyond mouse and keyboard are needed. Frequently interfaces use videogames to mediate the interaction between activities in the real world and activities in the virtual world; it is for this reason that we need to address questions of player experience and game design in movement-based rehabilitation systems. This paper proposes a view that takes into account aspects of user experience in the context of movement-based rehabilitation systems, focusing on concepts like immersion and flow.
- S Pasch, M., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., Van Dijk, B., & Nijholt, A. (2009). Immersion in Movement-Based Interaction. Engineering, 9, 169--180. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/149580/.Google Scholar
- Jacob, R. K. J. What you look is what you get: Eye movement-based interaction techniques, In: Procedings CHI 1990, pp. 11--18 (1990). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mueller, F., Agamanolis, S., Picard, R.: Exertion Interfaces: Sports over a Distance for Social Bonding and Fun. In: Proceedings CHI 2003, pp. 561--568 (2003). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pridmore T., D. Hilton, J. Green, R. Eastgate and S. Cobb (2004). Mixed reality environments in stroke rehabilitation: interfaces across the real/virtual divide. Proc. 5th Intl Conf. Disability, Virtual-Reality & Assoc. Tech., Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Milgram, Paul; H. Takemura, A. Utsumi, F. Kishino (1994). Augmented Reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Proceedings of Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies. pp. 2351--34. Retrieved 2007-03-15.Google Scholar
- Robertson G. G., Card S. K., and Mackinlay J. D., Non-immersive virtual reality. Computer 26, 81--83. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Armeo Boom, (2012), retrieved from: http://www.hocoma.com/en/products/armeo/armeoboom/features-functions/Google Scholar
- P. Milgram and A. F. Kishino, Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E77-D (12), pp. 1321--1329, (1994).Google Scholar
- Michael Baran, Nicole Lehrer, Diana Siwiak, Yinpeng Chen, Margaret Duff, Todd Ingalls, and Thanassis Rikakis. (2011), Design of a home-based adaptive mixed reality rehabilitation system for stroke survivors. 33rd Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- J. W. Krakauer, (2006), Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation, Curr Opin Neurol, vol. 19, pp. 84--90.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. (1997): Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms, Proc. CHI'97, ACM Press, pp. 234--241 Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Leitner, M. Tomitsch, T. Költringer, K. Kappel, T. Greshenig, Designing tangible tabletop interfaces for patients in rehabilitation, in Conference & Workshop on Assistive Technologies for People with Vision & Hearing Impairments: Assistive Technology for All Ages (CVHI (2007), M. A. Hersh, Ed. Spain Aug. 2007.Google Scholar
- Hornecker, Eva (2009). Tangible Interaction. Retrieved 25 June 2012 from http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/tangible_interaction.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Milgram, Paul; H. Takemura, A. Utsumi, F. Kishino (1994). Augmented Reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Proceedings of Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies. pp. 2351--34. Retrieved 2007-03-15.Google Scholar
- Dourish, P., Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction2001: The MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Romero, P., & Calvillo-Gáámez, E. H. (2011). Towards an embodied view of flow. Second International Workshop on User Models for Motivational Systems (UMMS 2011) (pp. 100--105). Girona, SpainGoogle Scholar
- Hornecker, Eva and Buur, Jacob (2006): Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems2006. pp. 437--446. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. and J. Nakamura, Effortless Attention in Everyday Life: A Systematic Phenomenology, in Effortless Attention, B. Bruya, Editor 2010, The MIT Press: Boston.Google Scholar
- B. J. Schmeichel and R. F. Baumeister. Effortful attention control. In B. Bruya, editor, Effortless Attention: A New Perspective in the Cognitive Science of Attention and Action, pages 29--50. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott R. Klemmer, Bjorn Hartmann, and Leila Takayama. 2006. How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems (DIS '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 140--149. DOI=10.1145/1142405.1142429 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1142405.1142429 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Merleau-Ponty, M., Phenomenology of Perception1962, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Van den Hoogen W, Ijsselsteijn W, De Kort Y. Yes Wii can! Using digital games as a rehabilitation platform after stroke---The role of social support. Virtual Rehabil Int Conf. 2009; 195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICVR.2009.5174233Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hornecker, Eva and Buur, Jacob (2006): Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems2006. pp. 437--446. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bailenson, J. N. (2006). Transformed Social Interaction in Collaborative Virtual Environments. In Messaris, P. and Humphreys, L. (Ed.) Digital Media: Transformations in Human Communication. 255--264. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Larssen, A. T., et al., Introduction to the special issue on movement-based interaction. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 2007. 11(8): p. 607--608. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kneebone, I., Baker, J., & O'Malley, H. (2010). Screening for depression after stroke: developing protocols for the occupational therapist. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(2), 71--75. doi:10.4276/030802210X12658062793843Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- A user experience view for rehabilitation systems
Recommendations
Augmented Reality Games for Upper-Limb Stroke Rehabilitation
VS-GAMES '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Second International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious ApplicationsStroke is the number one cause of severe physical disability in the UK. Recent studies have shown that technologies such as virtual reality and imaging can provide an engaging and motivating tool for physical rehabilitation. In this paper we summarize ...
Effects on User Experience in an Edutainment Virtual Environment: Comparison Between CAVE and HMD
ECCE '17: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive ErgonomicsThe user experience in immersive virtual environment can be broadly defined by the feeling of presence and immersion in a virtual environment. The propensity of feeling "there" and "enveloped by" in the virtual environment seems to be essential in ...
Simulator sickness in virtual display gaming: a comparison of stereoscopic and non-stereoscopic situations
MobileHCI '06: Proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and servicesIn this paper we compare simulator sickness symptoms produced by racing game in three different conditions. In the first experiment the participants played the Need for Speed car racing game with an ordinary 17" display and in the second and third ...
Comments