skip to main content
10.1145/2382456.2382504acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Crafting great user experiences

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

As a user of products and technology, one often experiences a wide range of emotions: happiness, frustration, gratitude, irritation, excitement, and apathy amongst others. Yet, as designers and deliverers of these tools and services, the human factor is often neglected with dire consequences. Deadlines and budgets become more important than analyzing the needs and behaviors of the user, unlinking the resource from its consumer. This degrades the perception of the offering and can be irreversible (and potentially fatal) to the reputation of software companies, IT departments, and hardware manufacturers. Despite the failings of many companies that have neglected the human element - companies that lacked empathy for their users - products continue to be delivered that are unintuitive, over designed, or inefficient. A great product or offering considers the user's experience (UX) when interacting with the service. The product is efficient and intuitive, while being transparent in presentation. UX is generally associated with software, but experiences are designed outside of computing as well. An often-polarizing example is customer service; customers remember great customer service experiences as much as they remember poor experiences. Technology often enhances the user experience, but the experience itself is not confined to interactions with specific tools. Training IT help desk staff on how to interact with customers may not be something traditionally thought of as a UX initiative, but this is one small part of the experience that is designed for individuals having issues with their devices. At Santa Clara Law, the Law Technology and Academic Computing (LTAC) group has improved efficiency, customer satisfaction, and saved time by considering UX principles early and often. Decisions once made with dangerous assumptions on the user's behalf are now considered with comprehensive data collected from a variety of different sources. Listening to what users are saying also helps LTAC adapt to the users' changing needs and continually enhance offerings

References

  1. NIELSEN NORMAN GROUP. 2012. User Experience: Our Definition http://www.nngroup.com/about/userexperience.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. WATSON, BEN. 2011. The ROI of User Experience http://socialmediatoday.com/bitpakkit/267487/roi-uxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Crafting great user experiences

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGUCCS '12: Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services
        October 2012
        262 pages
        ISBN:9781450314947
        DOI:10.1145/2382456

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 October 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate123of170submissions,72%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader