skip to main content
10.1145/2383276.2383330acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompsystechConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adaptive e-learning system based on accumulative digital activities in revised Bloom's taxonomy

Published:22 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Adaptive e-learning systems enhance efficiency in education by providing personalized e-course content (e.g., learning materials and activities) that changes with respect to learners' needs and achievements. An adaptive approach is presented in this paper, which is based upon accumulative digital activities and which is ordered according to pre-established demarcations of cognitive skills with components of the dimension of knowledge within Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Utilizing the adaptive approach allows for a dynamic selection of different assignments for these activities in accordance with learners' resultant scores that are established after working on previous assignments. This type of selection ensures that individualized curricular content is determined by the level of knowledge of each learner and educational objectives. In order to be implemented the adaptive approach creates workflow that describes logical and meaningful connections between assignments of the digital activities. The implementation of the approach is made within the Moodle e-learning system by means of Bonita software in order to provide workflow modelling.

References

  1. Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition, New York Longman (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloom, B. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Published by Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA Copyright (c) 1984 by Pearson Education (1956).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brusilovsky, P. Adaptive and Intelligent Technologies for Web-based Education. In C. Rollinger and C. Peylo (eds.) Kunstliche Intelligenz (4), Special Issue on Intelligent Systems and Teleteaching, 19--25, (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brusilovsky, P., Nijhavan, H., A Framework for Adaptive E-learning Based on Distributed Re-usable Learning Activities, Driscoll, M. and Reeves, T. C. (eds.) Proc. of World Conference on E-Learning, E-Learn 2002, (Montreal, Canada, October 15--19, 2002), AACE, 154--161Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Churches, A. Bloom's Digital Taxonomy. http://edorigami.wikispaces.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Conole, G., Fill, K. A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities, JIME Special Issue: Advances in Learning Design, Aug. 2005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Graf S., B. List: An evaluation of Open Source E-Learning Platforms Stressing Adaptation Issues, Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05), July 2005, Taiwan, IEEE Press, pp. 163--165. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kostadinova, H., G. Totkov, Adaptive e-learning systems design: an approach based on digital activities according to bloom's taxonomy "Application of Information and Communication Technologies in Economy and Education", 2-3. 12, 2011, UNWE, Sofia, 458--465Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Raykova, M, Hr. Kostadinova, G. Totkov, Adaptive Test System Based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy, CompSysTech'11, 16--17 June 2011, Vienna, Austria. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Paramythis, A., S. Loidl-Reisinger, Adaptive Learning Environments and eLearning Standards, Electronic Journal on E-learning, Volume 2, Issue 1, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Shute, V., B. Towle, Adaptive E-learning. Educational Psychologist Volume: 38, Issue: 2, Publisher: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 10, Pages: 105--114 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Blackboard Learn Platform http://www.blackboard.com/Platforms/Learn/Products/Blackboard-Learn/Teaching-and-Learning/Feature-Showcase.aspx, accessed on 11 April 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. BPMN 2.0, http://www.bpmn.org/, accessed on 11 April 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Bonita Open Solution, http://www.bonitasoft.com/, accessed on 11 April 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Moodle Activities. http://docs.moodle.org/20/en/Module_security, accessed 11 April 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Moodle Web Services, http://docs.moodle.org/dev/Web_services, accessed on 11 April 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Adaptive e-learning system based on accumulative digital activities in revised Bloom's taxonomy

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CompSysTech '12: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies
          June 2012
          440 pages
          ISBN:9781450311939
          DOI:10.1145/2383276

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 June 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate241of492submissions,49%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader