Kent Sullivan
- 1.Dumas, J. S. and Redish, J. C. (1993). A Practical Guide to Usability Testing (pp. 324-325). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc. Google ScholarCross Ref
- 3.Usability Sciences Corporation. (1994). Windows 3.1 and Windows 95 Quantification of Learning Time & Productivity. (Available from http://www.microsoft. com/windows/product/usability.htm.)Google Scholar
- 4.Whiteside, J. L., Bennett, J, & Holtzblatt, K. (1988). Usability Engineering: Our Experience and Evolution. In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 791-817). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, B. V.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 5.Wiklund, M. E. (1994). Usability in Practice: How Companies Develop User-Friendly Products. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The Windows 95 user interface: a case study in usability engineering
Recommendations
Usability improvements in Lotus cc:Mail for Windows
CHI '96: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsBuilding a user-derived interface
Many human-computer interfaces are designed with the assumption that the user must adapt to the system, that users must be trained and their behavior altered to fit a given interface. The research presented here proceeds from the alternative assumption: ...
Usability of user interfaces: from monomodal to multimodal
BCS-HCI '07: Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI...but not as we know it - Volume 2This workshop is aimed at reviewing and comparing existing Usability Evaluation Methods (UEMs) which are applicable to monomodal and multimodal applications, whether they are web-oriented or not. It addresses the problem on how to assess the usability ...
Comments