skip to main content
10.1145/2387191.2387211acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Optimal and resilient routing for many-to-one topologies in event triggered wireless sensor networks

Published:21 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Existing research initiatives for monitoring changes in the Earth's surface evince the great value of new opportunities for monitoring networks to be deployed in volatile regions prone to movement. Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) for monitoring such volatile regions need routing protocols that can tolerate unpredictable changes akin to that found in ad hoc networks, and, due to the stringent resource constraints of WSNs, routing protocols should also be light-weight and efficient. To satisfy these requirements, one of the most capable and widely assimilated protocols is the Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing protocol, which offers low routing, processing, and memory overhead. The ad hoc and on-demand routing capabilities of AODV can efficiently maintain and reconnect unicast routes following incidents such as node demise and environmental changes that can obstruct, break, and fragment the routes. AODV, however, was not originally designed for WSNs in which numerous sensors typically send data to an associated base station or gateway node. It is this unique requirement in WSNs for efficient discovery of a many-to-one routing topology that is addressed in this work by proposing an incremental enhancement to AODV called Base Station Advertisements (BSA). The proposed hybrid protocol, AODV-BSA, offers efficient discovery of a near-optimal many-to-one routing topology by broadcasting a BSA at the network layer to discover near-optimal unicast routes from each sensor to its associated base station (BS). The many-to-one topology is then maintained via the ad hoc and on-demand capabilities of AODV, which provides robust maintenance by efficiently mending breaks and concatenating new extensions to routes in response to node demise and route fragmentation.

References

  1. I. F. Akyildiz and X. Wang. Wireless Mesh Networks. John Wiley Publishing Company, ISBN 978-0--470-03256--5, February 2009. pp107--108Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. G. Barrenetxea, B. Beferull-Lozano, M. Vetterli. Lattice networks: capacity limits, optimal routing, and queueing behavior. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol.14, no.3, pp.492--505, June 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. P. Dallas, C. A. Leckie, and K. Ramamohanarao. Analysis and Enhancement of On-demand Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the 3rd ACM PM2HW2N, (Oct. 2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D.P. Dallas, C.A. Leckie, K. Ramamohanarao. Hop-Count Monitoring: Detecting Sinkhole Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. 15th IEEE ICON, (Nov. 2007), 176--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. I. Downard. Simulating Sensor Networks in NS-2. Technical Report NRL/FR/5522-04--10073 (May 2004) Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.; (accessed May 14, 2012) http://tang.itd.nrl.navy.mil/pubs/docs/nrlsensorsim04.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. European Association of Remote Sensing Companies. (2011). Project to deploy seismic monitoring system {Online}. Available: EARSC Web site: http://earsc.org/news/project-to-deploy-seismic-monitoring-systemGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. European Seafloor Observatory NETwork (ESONET) and the European Multidisciplinary Seafloor Observation (EMSO). (2011). Objective {Online}. Available: ESONET/EMSO Web site: http://visobservatories.webs.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Fehnker, R. J. van Glabbeek, P. Höfner, A. K. Mciver, Portmann, M., and Tan, W.L. Modelling and Analysis of AODV in UPPAAL. In Proc. of the 1st WRiPE (Oct, 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. E. Garfield. Multiple Independent Discovery & Creativity in Science. In Essays of an Information Scientist, (Nov. 1980) Vol:4, p.660--665, 1979--80Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. H. Huijsing, M. Steyaert, and A. Van Roermund. Analog circuit design: sensor & actuator interface electronics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2005 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee. IEEE Std 802.15.4--2006 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.15.4--2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Information Sciences Institute. The Network Simulator: NS-2. University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA; http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/ (accessed April 14, 2012)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. P. Johnson, D. Sarioz, A. Bar-Noy, T. Brown, D. Verma, Chai Wah Wu; , More is More: The Benefits of Denser Sensor Deployment, INFOCOM 2009, IEEE , vol., no., pp.379--387, (April 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Li and Y. Liu. Underground coal mine monitoring with wireless sensor networks. In ACM Transactions on Sensor Networds, 5, 2, Article 10 (March 2009), 29 pages. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1498915.1498916 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. A. Longley, M. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, D. W. Rhind, Geographic Information Systems and Science. John Wiley & Sons, inc., Hoboken, N.J., 2011. pp164--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Maróti. Directed Flood-Routing Framework for WSNs. In Proc. of the Fifth ACM/IFIP/USENIX Int'l. Conf. on Middleware 78 (Oct, 2004), 99--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Microstrain. G-Link 2.4 GHz Wireless Accelerometer Node. Technical Product Overview (2006); http://www.aesensors.nl/pdf/Microstrain/2400_g-link_datasheet.pdf (accessed May 14, 2012)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. T. Mukherjee, S. K. S. Gupta, and G. Varsamopoulos. Analytical model for optimizing periodic route maintenance in proactive routing for manets. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Symposium on MSWiM (Oct. 2007), 201--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. B. Pasztor, L. Mottola, C. Mascolo, G. Picco, S. Ellwood, and D. Macdonald. Selective reprogramming of mobile sensor networks through social community detection. Wireless Sensor Networks, '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. E. Perkins, E. M. Belding-Royer, and S. Das. Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing. RFC 3561, IETF Network Working Group, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. A. Pirzada, M. Portmann, and J. Indulska. Hybrid Mesh Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector Routing Protocol. In Proc. of the 13th Australasian Computer Science Conference (ACSC'07), v.29, p49--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. Srinivas, G. Zussmanm, and E. Modiano. Construction and Maintenance of Wireless Mobile Backbone Networks. In IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 17, no. 1, 239--252 (Feb. 2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Texas Instruments. CC2520 datasheet: Second generation 2.4 gHz IEEE 802.15.4/Zigbee RF Transciever. (Dec. 2007); http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cc2520.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. R. Timo and L. Hanlen. MANETs: Routing Overhead and Reliability. In Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular technology Conference, Melbourne, Australia, May 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. U.S. Geological Survey. (2011). Land Remote Sensing Program {Online}. Available: USGS Web site: http://remotesensing.usgs.gov (accessed May 14, 2012)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. C. Waldmann, M. Diepenbroek, L. Thomsen, A. Boetius, O. Pfannkuche, and M. Klages. The German contribution to ESONET - Integrating activities for setting up an interoperable ocean observation system in Europe. Oceans 2007 - EUROPE, VOLS 1--3, pp. 738--741, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. T. Yang, L. Barolli, M. Ikeda, G. De Marco, F. Xhafa, R. Miho. Performance Evaluation of a Wireless Sensor Network Considering Mobile Event. CISIS '09, (Mar. 2009), pp. 1169--1174. DOI:10.1109/CISIS.2009.105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. F. Zeiger, N. Kraemer, and K. Schilling. Commanding Mobile Robots via Wireless Ad-hoc Networks - A Comparison of Four Ad-hoc Routing Protocol Implementations. In ICRA, 2008, 590--595.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. H. Zhang, A. Arora, Y. Choi, M. G. Gouda. Reliable Bursty Convergecast in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Computer Communications, v.30 n.13, (Sep. 2007), 2560--2576. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Optimal and resilient routing for many-to-one topologies in event triggered wireless sensor networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PM2HW2N '12: Proceedings of the 7th ACM workshop on Performance monitoring and measurement of heterogeneous wireless and wired networks
      October 2012
      206 pages
      ISBN:9781450316262
      DOI:10.1145/2387191

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate74of226submissions,33%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader