skip to main content
10.1145/2388676.2388749acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Multi-modal interfaces for control of assistive robotic devices

Published:22 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an outline of dissertation research activities which aim to advance the use of non-traditional, multimodal interfaces in assistive robotic devices. The data modalities which are of particular interest in the work are perception of the environment using 3D scanning and computer vision, estimation of the user point of gaze, and perception of user intent during interaction with objects of interest. The main goal of this research is to explore the hypothesis that the combination of these data modalities can be used to provide intuitive and effective means of control over existing robotic platforms, such as wheelchairs and manipulators, to users with severe physical impairments.

References

  1. G. Galatas, C. McMurrough, G. L. Mariottini, and F. Makedon. eyeDog. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments - PETRA '11, volume 10, New York, New York, USA, 2011. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Li, J. Babcock, and D. J. Parkhurst. openEyes: a low-cost head-mounted eye-tracking solution. In Proceedings of the 2006 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications - ETRA '06, page 95, New York, New York, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Z. Lieberman, C. Sugrue, T. Watson, J. Powderly, E. Roth, and T. Quan. The EyeWriter, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Mcmurrough, A. Papangelis, and A. Boisselle. A Survey of Assistive Devices for Cerebral Palsy Patients. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments - PETRA '12, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. McMurrough, J. Rich, V. Metsis, A. Nguyen, and F. Makedon. Low-cost Head Position Tracking for Gaze Point Estimation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments - PETRA '12, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. D. McMurrough, V. Metsis, J. Rich, and F. Makedon. An eye tracking dataset for point of gaze detection. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications - ETRA '12, page 305, New York, New York, USA, 2012. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. D. McMurrough, J. Rich, C. Conly, V. Athitsos, and F. Makedon. Multi-Modal Object of Interest Detection Using Eye Gaze and RGB-D Cameras. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Milner and M. Goodale. The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2nd edition, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. V. Pasian, F. Corno, I. Signorile, and L. Farinetti. The Impact of Gaze Controlled Technology on Quality of Life. In Gaze Interaction and Applications of Eye Tracking: Advances in Assistive Technologies, chapter 6, pages 48--54. IGI Global, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. F. Pirri, M. Pizzoli, and A. Rudi. A general method for the point of regard estimation in 3D space. In CVPR 2011, pages 921--928. IEEE, June 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. San Agustin, H. Skovsgaard, J. P. Hansen, and D. W. Hansen. Low-cost gaze interaction: ready to deliver the promises. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI EA '09, page 4453, New York, New York, USA, 2009. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. K. Takemura, Y. Kohashi, T. Suenaga, J. Takamatsu, and T. Ogasawara. Estimating 3D point-of-regard and visualizing gaze trajectories under natural head movements. In Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications - ETRA '10, volume 1, page 157, New York, New York, USA, 2010. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Winfield and D. Parkhurst. Starburst: A hybrid algorithm for video-based eye tracking combining feature-based and model-based approaches. In 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Workshops, volume 3, pages 79--79. IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multi-modal interfaces for control of assistive robotic devices

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ICMI '12: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction
            October 2012
            636 pages
            ISBN:9781450314671
            DOI:10.1145/2388676

            Copyright © 2012 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 22 October 2012

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • poster

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader