skip to main content
10.1145/2389176.2389185acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Collaborative reflection at work: supporting informal learning at a healthcare workplace

Published:27 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Reflection is a common means to improve work: Every day, people think back to past work and - oftentimes in a group - try to find out whether they can improve it or whether they can derive better practices from it. However, especially collaborative reflection is neglected in research and design and consequently, there are hardly any insights on how it takes place in the practice of daily work and how tools can support it. To shed light on these questions, this paper presents a case that has been analyzed in a hospital as part of a series of studies on collaborative reflection in practice. Focusing this case and backing it with the other studies, the paper presents peculiarities and needs of collaborative reflection in healthcare workplaces as well as a more general formalization of collaborative reflection characteristics. Based on these results, an application to support physicians in their reflection was prototyped and tested. The presented results primarily apply to healthcare workplaces, but also cover general findings for the support of collaborative reflection.

References

  1. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. A. 1996. Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D. 1985. Reflection: turning experience into learning. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Daudelin, W. 1996. Learning from experience through reflection. Organizational Dynamics. 24, 3 (1996), 36--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Dyke, M. 2006. The role of the "Other" in reflection, knowledge formation and action in a late modernity. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 25, (Mar. 2006), 105--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Efimova, L. 2004. Discovering the iceberg of knowledge work: A weblog case. Proceedings of The Fifth European Conference on Organisational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities (OKLC 2004), April 2-3, 2004 (Apr. 2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer, G. and Herrmann, T. 2011. Socio-Technical Systems: A Meta-Design Perspective. International Journal for Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development. 3, 1 (2011), 1--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fleck, R. and Fitzpatrick, G. Supporting Collaborative Reflection with Passive Image Capture. IN SUPPLEMENTARY PROCEEDINGS OF COOP'06. 41--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fleck, R. and Fitzpatrick, G. 2009. Teachers' and tutors' social reflection around SenseCam images. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 67, 12 (2009), 1024--1036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Forneris, S. G. and Peden-McAlpine, C. J. 2006. Contextual Learning: A Reflective Learning Intervention for Nursing Education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 3, 1 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gustafsson, C. and Fagerberg, I. 2004. Reflection, the way to professional development? Journal of Clinical Nursing. 13, 3 (2004), 271--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Høyrup, S. 2004. Reflection as a core process in organisational learning. Journal of Workplace Learning. 16, 8 (Dec. 2004), 442--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Järvinen, A. and Poikela, E. 2001. Modelling reflective and contextual learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learn-ing. 13, 7/8 (Dec. 2001), 282--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Knipfer, K., Prilla, M., Cress, U. and Herrmann, T. 2011. Computer Support for Collaborative Reflection on Captured Teamwork Data. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (2011), 938--939.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kolb, D. 1984. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Loo, R. and Thorpe, K. 2002. Using reflective learning journals to improve individual and team performance. Team Performance Management. 8, 5 (2002), 134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mamede, S. and Schmidt, H. G. 2005. Correlates of reflective practice in medicine. Advances in health sciences education. 10, 4 (2005), 327--337.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mann, K., Gordon, J. and MacLeod, A. 2009. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 14, 4 (2009), 595--621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Prilla, M., Herrmann, T. and Degeling, M. 2012. Collaborative Reflection for Learning at the Healthcare Workplace. CSCL@Work: Case Studies of Collaborative Learning at Work. S. Goggins, I. Jahnke, and V. Wulf, eds. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Prilla, M., Knipfer, K., Degeling, M., Cress, U. and Herrmann, T. 2011. Computer Support for Collaborative Reflection on Captured Teamwork Data. Proceedings of 1st European Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Learning Networks (ARNets11) at EC-TEL 2011 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Schön, D. A. 1983. The reflective practitioner. Basic books New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Scott, S. G. 2010. Enhancing Reflection Skills Through Learning Portfolios: An Empirical Test. Journal of Management Education. 34, 3 (Jun. 2010), 430--457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tang, C. and Carpendale, S. 2009. Supporting nurses' information flow by integrating paper and digital charting. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 09) (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Teekman, B. 2000. Exploring reflective thinking in nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 31, 5 (2000), 1125--1135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Woerkom, M. van and Croon, M. 2008. Operationalising critically reflective work behaviour. Personnel Review. 37, 3 (2008), 317--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Yip, K. 2006. Self-reflection in reflective practice: A note of caution. British Journal of Social Work. (2006), 777--788.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Collaborative reflection at work: supporting informal learning at a healthcare workplace

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GROUP '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
        October 2012
        342 pages
        ISBN:9781450314862
        DOI:10.1145/2389176

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 October 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader