skip to main content
10.1145/2389176.2389210acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tagging Wikipedia: collaboratively creating a category system

Published:27 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Category systems have traditionally been created by small committees of people who had authority over the system they were designing. With the rise of large-scale social media systems, category schemes are being created by groups with differing perspectives, values, and expectations for how categories will be used. Prior studies of social tagging and folksonomy focused on the application and evolution of the collective category scheme, but struggled to uncover some of the collective rationale undergirding the decision-making processes in those schemes. In this paper, we qualitatively analyze the early discussions among editors of Wikipedia about the design and creation of its category system. We highlight three themes that dominated the discussion: hierarchy, scope and navigation, and relate these themes to their more formal roots in the information science literature. We distill out four styles of collaboration with regard to category systems that apply broadly to social tagging and other folksonomies. We conclude the paper with implications for collaborative tools and category systems as applied to large-scale collaborative systems.

References

  1. Aitchison, J., Gilchrist, A., and Bawden, D. "Section F structure and relationships." In Thesaurus Construction and Use: A Practical Manual. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers (2000): 49--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Farooq, U., Kannampallil, T. G., Song, Y., Ganoe, C., Carroll, J. M. and Giels, C. L. Evaluating Tagging Behavior in Social Bookmarking Systems: Metrics and Design Heuristics. In Proceedings of the ACM 2007 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, ACM Press (2007), 351--360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Feinberg, M. Expressive bibliography: personal collections in public space. Knowledge Organization 38 (2) (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Forte, A., and Bruckman, A. Scaling Consensus: Increasing Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Golder, S. A. and Huberman, B. A. The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. Journal of Information Science, 32 (2). 198--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Holloway, T., Bozicevic, M. and Börner, K. Analyzing and visualizing the semantic coverage of Wikipedia and its authors. Complexity, 12 (2007), 30--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kriplean, T., I. Beschastnikh, and D. W. McDonald. Articulations of wikiwork: uncovering valued work in wikipedia through barnstars. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM Press (2008), 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kittur, A., Chi, E. and B. Suh. What's in Wikipedia?: mapping topics and conflict using socially annotated category structure. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press (2009), 1509--1512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lee, H. L. and Olson, H. A. Hierarchical navigation: An exploration of Yahoo! directories. Knowledge Organization, 32 (1) (2005), 10--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Millen, D. R., Feinberg, J. and Kerr, B., Dogear: Social Bookmarking in the Enterprise. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press (2006), 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Muchnik, L., Itzhack, R., Solomon, S. and Louzoun, Yoram. Self-emergence of knowledge trees: Extraction of the Wikipedia hierarchies. Physical Review E 76, 1 (2007), 016106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sen, S., Lam, S. K. T., Rashid, A. M., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Osterhouse, J., Harper, F. M. and Riedl, J., tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM Press (2006), 181--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Spinellis, D. and Louridas, P. The collaborative organization of knowledge. Communications of the ACM 51(8), (August 2008), 68--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Svenonius, Elaine. 2000. The intellectual foundation of information organization. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Voss, J. Collaborative Thesaurus Tagging the Wikipedia Way, (2006) http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0-604036. Accessed Jan 21, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Tagging Wikipedia: collaboratively creating a category system

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            GROUP '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
            October 2012
            342 pages
            ISBN:9781450314862
            DOI:10.1145/2389176

            Copyright © 2012 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 27 October 2012

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader