ABSTRACT
Future sustainable energy systems will need efficient, clean, low-cost, renewable energy sources, as well as market structures that motivate sustainable behaviors on the part of households and businesses. "Smart grid" components can help consumers manage their consumption only if pricing policies are in place that motivate consumers to install and use these new tools in ways that maximize utilization of renewable energy sources while minimizing dependence on non-renewable energy. Serious market breakdowns, such as the California energy crisis in 2000, have made policy makers wary of setting up new retail energy markets. We present the design of an open, competitive simulation approach that will produce robust research results on the structure and operation of retail power markets as well as on automating market interaction by means of competitively tested and bench-marked electronic agents. These results will yield policy guidance that can significantly reduce the risk of instituting competitive energy markets at the retail level, thereby applying economic motivation to the problem of adjusting our energy production and consumption patterns to the requirements of a sustainable future.
- Ahlert, K.-H., and Block, C. Assessing the impact of price forecast errors on the economics of distributed storage systems. In 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS-43) (Hawaii, USA, 2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amin, M., and Wollenberg, B. Toward a smart grid: Power delivery for the 21st century. IEEE Power & Energy Magazine 3, 5 (2005), 34--41.Google Scholar
- Blaabjerg, F., Teodorescu, R., Liserre, M., and Timbus, A. Overview of control and grid synchronization for distributed power generation systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 53, 5 (2006), 1398--1409.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Block, C., Bomarius, F., Bretschneider, P., Briegel, F., Burger, N., Fey, B., Frey, H., Hartmann, J., Kern, C., Plail, B., Praehauser, G., Schetters, L., Schoepf, F., Schumann, D., Schwammberger, F., Terzidis, O., Thiemann, R., van Dinther, C., von Sengbusch, K., Weidlich, A., and Weinhardt, C. Internet der Energie - IKT für Energiemärkte der Zukunft. Bdi-drucksache nr. 418, Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V. (BDI), 12 2008.Google Scholar
- Block, C., Collins, J., Ketter, W., and Weinhardt, C. A multi-agent energy trading competition. Tech. Rep. ERS-2009-054-LIS, RSM Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Borenstein, S., Bushnell, J. B., and Wolak, F. A. Measuring market inefficiencies in California's restructured wholesale electricity market. The American Economic Review 92, 5 (2002), 1376--1405.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Collins, J., Arunachalam, R., Sadeh, N., Ericsson, J., Finne, N., and Janson, S. The supply chain management game for the 2006 trading agent competition. Tech. Rep. CMU-ISRI-05-132, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, November 2005.Google Scholar
- Technology options for the near and long term. Tech. rep., U. S. Department of Energy Climate Change Technology Program, September 2006.Google Scholar
- EEX. Introduction to exchange trading at EEX on Xetra and Eurex. Tech. rep., European Energy Exchange AG, January 2008.Google Scholar
- Hammerstrom, D. J., Ambrosio, R., Brous, J., Carlon, T. A., Chassin, D. P., DeSteese, J. G., Guttromson, R. T., Horst, G. R., Järvegren, O. M., Kajfasz, R., Katipamula, S., Kiesling, L., Le, N. T., Michie, P., Oliver, T. V., Pratt, R. G., Thompson, S., and Yao, M. Pacific northwest gridwise testbed demonstration projects: The Olympic Peninsula project. Final report, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, October 2007.Google Scholar
- Hatziargyriou, N., Asano, H., Iravani, R., and Marnay, C. Microgrids: An overview of ongoing research, development, and demonstration projects. Berkeley Lab Publications LBNL-62937, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, July 2007.Google Scholar
- Hirsch, C., Hillemacher, L., Block, C., Schuller, A., and Moest, D. Simulation studies within the MEREGIO field experiment. IT - Information Technology forthcoming (2010).Google Scholar
- Jonker, C. M., and Treur, J. An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation. In International joint conference on artificial intelligence (2001), pp. 1195--1201. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jordan, P. R., Cassell, B., Callender, L. F., and Wellman, M. P. The ad auctions game for the 2009 trading agent competition. Tech. rep., University of Michigan, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, 2009.Google Scholar
- Jordan, P. R., Kiekintveld, C., and Wellman, M. P. Empirical game-theoretic analysis of the TAC supply chain game. In Proc. of the Sixth Int'l Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (May 2007), pp. 1188--1195. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joskow, P., and Kahn, E. A quantitative analysis of pricing behavior in California's wholesale electricity market during summer 2000. NBER Working Paper Series 8157, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2001.Google Scholar
- Ketter, W., Collins, J., Gini, M., Gupta, A., and Schrater, P. Detecting and forecasting economic regimes in multi-agent automated exchanges. Decision Support Systems 47, 4 (2009), 307--318. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kiekintveld, C., Miller, J., Jordan, P. R., Callender, L. F., and Wellman, M. P. Forecasting market prices in a supply chain game. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 8, 2 (2009), 63--77. Special Section: Supply Chain Trading Agent Research. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meeus, L., and Belmans, R. Is the prevailing wholesale market design in Europe and North America comparable? In Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2007. IEEE (2007), pp. 1--5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miller, J., Page, S., and LeBaron, B. Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Niu, J., Cai, K., Parsons, S., Gerding, E., and McBurney, P. Characterizing effective auction mechanisms: Insights from the 2007 TAC market design competition. In Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems-Volume 2 (2008), International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 1079--1086. Google ScholarDigital Library
- North, M., Conzelmann, G., Koritarov, V., Macal, C., Thimmapuram, P., and Veselka, T. E-laboratories: agent-based modeling of electricity markets. In 2002 American Power Conference (2002), pp. 1--19.Google Scholar
- Pardoe, D., and Stone, P. Adapting in agent-based markets: A study from tac scm. In Proc. of the Sixth Int'l Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (May 2007), pp. 677--679. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sanchez, I. Short-term prediction of wind energy production. International Journal of Forecasting 22, 1 (January 2006), 43--56.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Siddiqui, A., Bartholomew, E., and Marnay, C. Empirical analysis of the spot market implications of price-elastic demand. Berkeley Lab Publications LBNL-56141, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, July 2004.Google Scholar
- Sodomka, E., Collins, J., and Gini, M. Efficient statistical methods for evaluating trading agent performance. In Proc. of the Twenty-Second National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2007), pp. 770--775. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Spees, K., and Lave, L. Impacts of responsive load in PJM: Load shifting and real time pricing. The Energy Journal 29, 2 (2008), 101--122.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sueyoshi, T., and Tadiparthi, G. An agent-based decision support system for wholesale electricity market. Decision Support Systems 44, 2 (2008), 425--446. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sun, J., and Tesfatsion, L. Dynamic testing of wholesale power market designs: An open-source agent-based framework. Computational Economics 30, 3 (2007), 291--327. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tesfatsion, L. Agent-based computational economics: Growing economies from the bottom up. Artificial Life 8, 1 (2002), 55--82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Varga, L. Z., Jennings, N. R., and Cockburn, D. Integrating intelligent systems into a cooperating community for electricity distribution management. Int. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications 7, 4 (1994), 563--579.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Veit, D., Weidlich, A., and Krafft, J. A. An agent-based analysis of the german electricity market with transmission capacity constraints. Energy Policy 37, 10 (2009), 4132--4144.Google ScholarCross Ref
- von Dollen, D. Report to NIST on the smart grid interoperability standards roadmap. Tech. Rep. SB1341-09-CN-0031, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), June 2009.Google Scholar
- Wellman, M. P., Greenwald, A., and Stone, P. Autonomous Bidding Agents. MIT Press, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhou, Z., Chan, W., and Chow, J. Agent-based simulation of electricity markets: a survey of tools. Artificial Intelligence Review 28, 4 (2007), 305--342. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Competitive One-to-One Promotions
One-to-one promotions are possible when consumers are individually addressable and firms know something about each customer's preferences. We explore the competitive effects of one-to-one promotions in a model with two competing firms where the firms ...
Competitive Behavior-Based Price Discrimination for Software Upgrades
The introduction of product upgrades in a competitive environment is commonly observed in the software industry. When introducing a new product, a software vendor may employ behavior-based price discrimination (BBPD) by offering a discount over its ...
Modeling Competitive Marketing Strategies: The Impact of Marketing-Mix Relationships and Industry Structure
This paper empirically analyzes the formulation of competitive marketing strategies consisting of product quality levels, promotional expenditures and prices. Using a simultaneous-equation model, we examine the use of prices and promotional spending as ...
Comments