skip to main content
10.1145/2389686.2389705acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multilevel business process modeling: motivation, approach, design issues, and applications

Published: 02 November 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Conceptual models organize the data as well as the processes from a business domain using a human-readable, yet formal representation language. For static data models, various modeling approaches have been proposed to represent complex multilevel abstraction hierarchies. For process models, though, current modeling approaches do not provide a flexible and powerful formalism for representing complex multilevel abstraction hierarchies. In this paper, we motivate the need for multilevel business process models, present our initial approach, and sketch future research in this area.

References

[1]
C. Atkinson and T. Kühne. The essence of multilevel metamodeling. In Proc. UML '01, volume 2185 of LNCS, pages 19--33. 2001.
[2]
T. Basten and W. van der Aalst. Inheritance of behavior. J. of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 47(2):47--145, 2001.
[3]
M. Dahchour, A. Pirotte, and E. Zimányi. Materialization and its metaclass implementation. IEEE TKDE, 14(5):1078--1094, 2002.
[4]
A. Fleischmann and C. Stary. Whom to talk to? A stakeholder perspective on business process development. Universal Access in the Information Society, 11:125--150, 2012.
[5]
C. Gonzalez-Perez and B. Henderson-Sellers. A powertype-based metamodelling framework. Software & System Modeling, 5(1):72--90, 2006.
[6]
R. Hull. Artifact-centric business process models: Brief survey of research results and challenges. In Proc. OTM '08, volume 5332 of LNCS, pages 1152--1163. 2008.
[7]
R. Hull, E. Damaggio, R. De Masellis, F. Fournier, M. Gupta, F. T. Heath, S. Hobson, M. H. Linehan, S. Maradugu, A. Nigam, P. N. Sukaviriya, and R. Vaculín. Business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles: Managing artifact interactions with conditions and events. In Proc. DEBS '11, pages 51--62, 2011.
[8]
M. Jeusfeld, M. Jarke, and J. Mylopoulos. Metamodeling for method engineering. MIT Press, 2009.
[9]
G. Kappel and M. Schrefl. Object/behavior diagrams. In Proc. ICDE '91, pages 530--539, 1991.
[10]
R. Liu, F. Y. Wu, F. Pinel, and Z. Shan. A two-tier data-centric framework for flexible business process management. In Proc. AMCIS '12, 2012.
[11]
B. Neumayr, K. Grün, and M. Schrefl. Multi-level domain modeling with m-objects and m-relationships. In Proc. APCCM '09, pages 107--116, 2009.
[12]
B. Neumayr, M. Schrefl, and B. Thalheim. Hetero-homogeneous hierarchies in data warehouses. In Proc. APCCM '10, pages 61--70, 2010.
[13]
B. Neumayr, M. Schrefl, and B. Thalheim. Modeling techniques for multi-level abstraction. In The Evolution of Conceptual Modeling, volume 6520 of LNCS, pages 68--92. 2011.
[14]
A. Nigam and N. S. Caswell. Business artifacts: An approach to operational specification. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3):428--445, 2003.
[15]
Object Management Group. OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Superstructure, version 2.4.1, 2011.
[16]
J. Odell. Advanced object-oriented analysis and design using UML, chapter Power types, pages 23--32. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[17]
A. Pirotte, E. Zimányi, D. Massart, and T. Yakusheva. Materialization: A powerful and ubiquitous abstraction pattern. In Proc. VLDB '94, pages 630--641, 1994.
[18]
G. Redding, M. Dumas, A. ter Hofstede, and A. Iordachescu. A flexible, object-centric approach for business process modelling. Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 4(3):191--201, 2010.
[19]
M. Reichert, S. Rinderle-Ma, and P. Dadam. Flexibility in process-aware information systems. In Proc. ToPNoC II, volume 5460 of LNCS, pages 115--135. 2009.
[20]
S. Rinderle, M. Reichert, and P. Dadam. Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems - a survey. DKE, 50(1):9--34, 2004.
[21]
M. Schrefl and M. Stumptner. Behavior-consistent specialization of object life cycles. ACM ToSEM, 11(1):92--148, 2002.
[22]
C. Schütz. Extending data warehouses with hetero-homogeneous dimension hierarchies and cubes: A proof-of-concept prototype in Oracle. Master's thesis, JKU, Linz, Austria, 2010.
[23]
C. Schütz, L. Delcambre, and M. Schrefl. Multilevel business artifacts. In Proc. DAB '12, 2012. To appear. https://sites.google.com/site/dabworkshop2012/.
[24]
S. Smirnov, H. Reijers, and M. Weske. A semantic approach for business process model abstraction. In Proc. CAiSE '11, volume 6741 of LNCS, pages 497--511. 2011.
[25]
M. Stumptner and M. Schrefl. Behavior consistent inheritance in UML. In Proc. ER 2000, volume 1920 of LNCS, pages 451--530. 2000.
[26]
W. van der Aalst. The application of Petri Nets to workflow management. J. of Circuits, Systems, and Computers, 8(1):21--66, 1998.
[27]
W. van der Aalst, M. Weske, and D. Grünbauer. Case handling: A new paradigm for business process support. DKE, 53(2):129--162, 2005.
[28]
B. Weber, M. Reichert, and S. Rinderle-Ma. Change patterns and change support features - enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems. DKE, 66(3):438--466, 2008.
[29]
M. Weidlich, J. Mendling, and M. Weske. A foundational approach for managing process variability. In Proc. CAiSE '11, volume 6741 of LNCS, pages 267--282. 2011.
[30]
S. Yongchareon, C. Liu, and X. Zhao. A framework for behavior-consistent specialization of artifact-centric business processes. In Proc. BPM '12, volume 7481 of LNCS, pages 285--301. 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)A Systematic Review of Metamodelling in Software EngineeringRecent Advances in Intelligent Systems and Smart Applications10.1007/978-3-030-47411-9_1(3-27)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
PIKM '12: Proceedings of the 5th Ph.D. workshop on Information and knowledge
November 2012
108 pages
ISBN:9781450317191
DOI:10.1145/2389686
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 November 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. artifact-centric process modeling
  2. conceptual modeling
  3. metamodeling
  4. multilevel abstraction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CIKM'12
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 25 of 62 submissions, 40%

Upcoming Conference

CIKM '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)A Systematic Review of Metamodelling in Software EngineeringRecent Advances in Intelligent Systems and Smart Applications10.1007/978-3-030-47411-9_1(3-27)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media