skip to main content
10.1145/2390876.2390886acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automatic orchestration of video streams to enhance group communication

Published:29 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Unlike legacy video-conferencing, which connects two nodes each equipped with a camera, recent systems facilitating for video-mediated group communication deal simultaneously with a large number of video streams. This highlights the need for orchestration,, i.e. the intelligent selection of the most adequate camera views to be displayed on each screen. In this paper we present the initial results of a study that evaluates the effects of orchestration on communication within a specific context; that of two remote groups playing a collaborative board game. The results of the experiment indicate that automatic orchestration can provide improvements similar to the ones achieved when live video mixing is performed by human editors.

References

  1. R. Ballagas, J. J. Kaye, M. Ames, J. Go, and H. Raffle. Family communication: phone conversations with children. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC '09, pages 321--324, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. B. Bavelas, N. Chovil, D. A. Lawrie, and A. Wade. Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15(4):469--489, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. K. Chandy, O. Etzion, and R. von Ammon. The event processing manifesto. In K. M. Chandy, O. Etzion, and R. von Ammon, editors, Event Processing, number 10201 in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Falelakis, R. Kaiser, W. Weiss, and M. Ursu. Reasoning for video-mediated group communication. In Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo, July 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Garrod and M. J. Pickering. Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1):8--11, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Groen, M. Ursu, S. Michalakopoulos, M. Falelakis, and E. Gasparis. Improving video-mediated communication with orchestration. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5):1575--1579, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jboss drools http://www.jboss.org/drools.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Kaiser, W. Weiss, M. Falelakis, S. Michalakopoulos, and M. F. Ursu. A rule-based virtual director enhancing group communication. In IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo, July 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Korchagin, P. Motlicek, S. Duffner, and H. Bourlard. Just-in-time multimodal association and fusion from home entertainment. In Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo, July 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Lavee, E. Rivlin, and M. Rudzsky. Understanding video events: a survey of methods for automatic interpretation of semantic occurrences in video. IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cyber Part C, 39(5):489--504, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Polycom eagleeye director http://www.polycom.com/eagle-eye-director.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H. Sacks, E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4):696--735, 12 1974.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. C. Tang, C. Wei, and R. Kawal. Social telepresence bakeoff: Skype group video calling, google+ hangouts, and microsoft avatar kinect. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion, CSCW '12, pages 37--40, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Williams, M. F. Ursu, J. Meenowa, P. Cesar, I. Kegel, and K. Bergström. Video mediated social interaction between groups: System requirements and technology challenges. Telematics and Informatics, Nov. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Automatic orchestration of video streams to enhance group communication

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAM '12: Proceedings of the 2012 international workshop on Socially-aware multimedia
      October 2012
      68 pages
      ISBN:9781450315869
      DOI:10.1145/2390876

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SAM '12 Paper Acceptance Rate9of12submissions,75%Overall Acceptance Rate36of59submissions,61%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICSE 2025

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader