skip to main content
research-article

Beyond Recommendations: Local Review Web Sites and Their Impact

Published:01 December 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Online review Web sites have enabled new interactions between companies and their customers. In this article we draw on interviews with users, reviewers, and establishments to explore how local review Web sites can change interactions around local places. Review Web sites such as Yelp and Tripadvisor allow customers to “previsit” establishments and areas of a city before an actual visit. The collection of a large numbers of user-generated reviews has also created a new genre of writing, with reviewers gaining considerable pleasure from passing on word of mouth and influencing others’ choices. Reviews also offer a new channel of communication between establishments, customers, and competitors. We discuss how review Web sites can be designed to cater for a broader range of interactions around reviews beyond a focus on recommendations.

References

  1. Arnould, E. and Thompson, C. 2005. Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. J. Consum. Resear. 31, 868--882.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Blank, G. 2007. Critics, Ratings, and Society: The Sociology of Reviews. Rowman & Littlefield.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, B. and Chalmers, M. 2003. Tourism and mobile technology. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. K. Kuutti, E .H. Karsten, G. Fitzpatrick, P. Dourish, and K. Schmidt Eds., Klewer Academic Press, 335--355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brown, B., Geelhoed, E., and Sellen, A. 2001. Music sharing as a computer supported collaborative application. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer, 179--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chevalier, J. and Mayzlin, D. 2006. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Market. Resear. 43, 345--354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Clark, T. 2007. Don’t fear Starbucks: Why the franchise actually helps mom and pop coffeehouses. Slate Washington Post, Seatle.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cosley, D., Lam, S. K., Albert, I., Konstan, J. A., and Riedl, J. 2003. Is seeing believing?: How recommender system interfaces affect users’ opinions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 642713, 585--592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cotter, M. and Snyder, W. 1998. How guide books affect restaurant behavior. J. Restaurant Foodservice Market. 3, 69--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. David, S. and Pinch, T. 2006. Six degrees of reputation: The use and abuse of online review and recommendation systems. First Monday 11, 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Dodge, M. and Kitchin, R. 2004. Flying through code/space: The real virtuality of air travel. Environ. Plann. A 36, 195--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dourish, P. and Bell, G. 2007. The infrastructure of experience and the experience of infrastructure: Meaning and structure in everyday encounters with space. Environ. Plann. B 34, 414.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Flandrin, J. L. 1989. Distinction through taste. In A History of Private Life, R. Chartier and A. Goldhammer Eds., 265--308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ge, M., Delgado-Battenfeld, C., and Jannach, D. 2010. Beyond accuracy: Evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems ACM, 257--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gigante, D. 2005. Taste: A Literary History. Yale Univ Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., and Riedl, J. 2000. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 241--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jakob, N., Weber, S. H., Muller, M. C., and Gurevych, I. 2009. Beyond the stars: exploiting free-text user reviews to improve the accuracy of movie recommendations. In Proceedings of the 1st International CIKM Workshop on Topic-Sentiment Analysis for Mass Opinion. ACM, 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jeacle, I. and Carter, C. 2011. In Tripadvisor we trust: Rankings, calculative regimes and abstract systems. Account. Organiz. Soc. 36, 293--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kollock, P. 1999. The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In Communities in Cyberspace, M. Smith and P. Kollock Eds., Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kozinets, R. 2009. Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kozinets, R.V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A., and Wilner, S. 2010. Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. J. Market. 74, 71--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Kraut, R. E. and Resnick, P. 2012. Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Krestel, R. and Dokoohaki, N. 2011. Diversifying product review rankings: Getting the full picture. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology. IEEE, 138--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lampe, C., Ellison, N., and Steinfield, C. 2006. A face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. In Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 167--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Lefebvre, H. 1974. The Production of Space. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Leino, J. and Raiha, K.-J. 2007. Case amazon: Ratings and reviews as part of recommendations. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 137--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Levitt, S. 2005. Opinion: Why do people post reviews on Amazon? New York Times.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Linden, G., Conover, M., and Robertson, J. 2009. The Netflix prize, computer science outreach, and Japanese mobile phones. Comm. ACM 52, 8--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. McCarthy, C. 2009. Yelp’s CEO: No, we’re not the Mafia. CNET News. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10170895-36.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, B. N., Albert, I., Lam, S. K., Konstan, J. A., and Riedl, J. 2003. MovieLens unplugged: Experiences with an occasionally connected recommender system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’03). ACM, 263--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Mitchell, W. 1996. City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn. The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Moghaddam, S., Jamali, M., and Ester, M. 2011. Review recommendation: Personalized prediction of the quality of online reviews. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’11). ACM, 2249--2252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Moyer, M. 2010. Manipulation of the crowd: How trustworthy are online ratings? Scientific Amer. 303.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mudambi, S. M. and Schuff, D. 2010. What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Q. 34, 185--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Nardi, B., Schiano, D., Gumbercht, M., and Swartz, L. 2004. Why we blog. Comm. ACM 47, 41--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. O’Connor, P. 2008. User-generated content and travel: A case study on Tripadvisor.com. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2008, 47--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Mahony, M. P. and Smyth, B. 2009. Learning to recommend helpful hotel reviews. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 305--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Pattison, K. 2010. Talking to the chief of Yelp, the site that businesses love to hate. New York Times(3/24/10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Rader, E. and Wash, R. 2008. Influences on tag choices in del.icio.us. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 239--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Rashid, A. M., Ling, K., Tassone, R. D., Resnick, P., Kraut, R., and Riedl, J. 2006. Motivating participation by displaying the value of contribution. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 955--958. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., and Riedl, J. 1994. GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 175--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Richards, K. 2009. Yelp and the business of extortion 2.0. Easy Bay Express(2/18/09).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Schau, H., Muòiz Jr., A., and Arnould, E. 2009. How brand community practices create value. J. Market. 73, 30--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Shaw, S. A. 2005. Turning the Tables: Restaurants from the Inside Out. William Morrow Cookbooks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Spang, R. L. 2000. The Invention of the Restaurant: Paris and Modern Gastronomic Culture. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Sweney, M. 2011. Tripadvisor faces ASA investigation after review complaints. The Guardian, Manchester, England (9/2/11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Tripadvisor. 2012. About us. http://www.tripadvisor.com/pages/about_us.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang, Z. 2010. Anonymity, social image, and the competition for volunteers: A case study of the online market for reviews. BE J. Econ. Anal. Policy 10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Yelp. 2010a. Yelp’s Review Filter Explained. Yelp Official Blog. March 2010. http://officialblog.yelp.com/2010/03/yelpreview-filter-explained.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Yelp. 2010b. Announcing steps to avoid confusion and increase transparency. Yelp Official Blog (4/10). http://officialblog.yelp.com/2010/04/announcing-steps-to-avoid-confusion-increase-transparency.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Yelp. 2012. About us. http://www.yelp.com/about.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Zagat. 2009. New York City Restaurants. Zagat Survey, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhan, J., Loh, H. T., and Liu, Y. 2009. Gather customer concerns from online product reviews-A text summarization approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 2107--2115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Beyond Recommendations: Local Review Web Sites and Their Impact

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
        ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 19, Issue 4
        December 2012
        236 pages
        ISSN:1073-0516
        EISSN:1557-7325
        DOI:10.1145/2395131
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 December 2012
        • Revised: 1 August 2012
        • Accepted: 1 August 2012
        • Received: 1 February 2012
        Published in tochi Volume 19, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader